Komagataella phaffii (syn. Pichia pastoris) is one of the most commonly used host systems for recombinant protein expression. Achieving targeted genetic modifications had been hindered by low frequencies of homologous recombination (HR). Recently, a CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system has been implemented for P. pastoris enabling gene knockouts based on indels (insertion, deletions) via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) at near 100% efficiency. However, specifically integrating homologous donor cassettes via HR for replacement studies had proven difficult resulting at most in ∼20% correct integration using CRISPR/Cas9. Here, we demonstrate the CRISPR/Cas9 mediated integration of markerless donor cassettes at efficiencies approaching 100% using a ku70 deletion strain. The Ku70p is involved in NHEJ repair and lack of the protein appears to favor repair via HR near exclusively. While the absolute number of transformants in the Δku70 strain is reduced, virtually all surviving transformants showed correct integration. In the wildtype strain, markerless donor cassette integration was also improved up to 25-fold by placing an autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) on the donor cassette. Alternative strategies for improving donor cassette integration using a Cas9 nickase variant or reducing off targeting associated toxicity using a high fidelity Cas9 variant were so far not successful in our hands in P. pastoris. Furthermore we provide Cas9/gRNA expression plasmids with a Geneticin resistance marker which proved to be versatile tools for marker recycling. The reported CRSIPR-Cas9 tools can be applied for modifying existing production strains and also pave the way for markerless whole genome modification studies in P. pastoris.

Bisy e U Wetzawinkel Hofstätten Raab Austria

Department of Biotechnology University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Molecular Biotechnology Graz University of Technology Graz Austria

See more in PubMed

Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR‐Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32:347–355. PubMed PMC

Wang H, La Russa M, Qi LS. CRISPR/Cas9 in genome editing and beyond. Ann Rev Biochem. 2016; 85:227–264. PubMed

Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR‐Cas9. Science. 2014; 346:1258096. PubMed

Xue W, Chen S, Yin H, et al. CRISPR‐mediated direct mutation of cancer genes in the mouse liver. Nature. 2014; 514:380–384. PubMed PMC

Matano M, Date S, Shimokawa M, et al. Modeling colorectal cancer using CRISPR‐Cas9‐mediated engineering of human intestinal organoids. Nat Med. 2015; 21:256–262. PubMed

Wu Y, Liang D, Wang Y, et al. Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR‐Cas9. Cell Stem Cell. 2013; 13:659–662. PubMed

Baltimore D, Berg P, Botchan M, et al. Biotechnology. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science 2015; 348:36–38. PubMed PMC

Roointan A, Morowvat MH. Road to the future of systems biotechnology: CRISPR‐Cas‐mediated metabolic engineering for recombinant protein production. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2016; 32:74–91. PubMed

Krappmann S. CRISPR‐Cas9, the new kid on the block of fungal molecular biology. Med Mycol. 2017;55:16–23. PubMed

Shen C‐C, Sung L‐Y, Lin S‐Y, Lin M‐W, Hu Y‐C. Enhancing protein production yield from chinese hamster ovary cells by CRISPR interference. ACS Synth Biol. 2017; 6:1509–1519. PubMed

Park G, Ouyang S, Borkovich KA. High‐throughput construction of genetically modified fungi In: Schmoll M, Dattenböck C, editors. Gene Expression systems in fungi: advancements and applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016:pp 241–252.

Weninger A, Killinger M, Vogl T. Key methods for synthetic biology: genome engineering and DNA assembly In: Glieder A, Kubicek CP, Mattanovich D, Wiltschi B, Sauer M, editors. Synthetic biology. Vol 8 Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016:pp 101–141.

Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas‐based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2013; 31:397–405. PubMed PMC

Kim H, Kim J‐S. A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases. Nat Rev Genet. 2014; 15:321–334. PubMed

Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual‐RNA‐guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012; 337:816–821. PubMed PMC

Ma D, Liu F. Genome editing and its applications in model organisms. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015; 13:336–344. PubMed PMC

Kumar V, Jain M. The CRISPR‐Cas system for plant genome editing: advances and opportunities. J Exp Bot. 2015; 66:47–57. PubMed

Kleinstiver BP, Pattanayak V, Prew MS, et al. High‐fidelity CRISPR‐Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome‐wide off‐target effects. Nature. 2016; 529:490. PubMed PMC

Slaymaker IM, Gao LY, Zetsche B, Scott DA, Yan WX, Zhang F. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science. 2016; 351:84–88. PubMed PMC

Bill RM. Playing catch‐up with Escherichia coli: using yeast to increase success rates in recombinant protein production experiments. Front Microbiol. 2014; 5:85. PubMed PMC

Cregg JM, Cereghino JL, Shi J, Higgins DR. Recombinant protein expression in Pichia pastoris . Mol Biotechnol. 2000; 16:23–52. PubMed

Ahmad M, Hirz M, Pichler H, Schwab H. Protein expression in Pichia pastoris: recent achievements and perspectives for heterologous protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98:5301–5317. PubMed PMC

Näätsaari L, Mistlberger B, Ruth C, Hajek T, Hartner FS, Glieder A. Deletion of the Pichia pastoris KU70 homologue facilitates platform strain generation for gene expression and synthetic biology. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7:e39720. PubMed PMC

Smih F, Rouet P, Romanienko PJ, Jasin M. Double‐strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23:5012–5019. PubMed PMC

Storici F, Durham CL, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. Chromosomal site‐specific double‐strand breaks are efficiently targeted for repair by oligonucleotides in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100:14994–14999. PubMed PMC

Caldecott KW. Single‐strand break repair and genetic disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9:619–631. PubMed

Jacobs JZ, Ciccaglione KM, Tournier V, Zaratiegui M. Implementation of the CRISPR‐Cas9 system in fission yeast. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:1–5. PubMed PMC

Horwitz AA, Walter JM, Schubert MG, et al. Efficient multiplexed integration of synergistic alleles and metabolic pathways in yeasts via CRISPR‐Cas. Cell Syst. 2015; 1:88–96. PubMed

Vyas VK, Barrasa MI, Fink GR. A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Sci Adv. 2015; 1:e1500248. PubMed PMC

Min K, Ichikawa Y, Woolford CA, Mitchell AP. Candida albicans gene deletion with a transient CRISPR‐Cas9 system. mSphere. 2015; 1:1–9. PubMed PMC

Enkler L, Richer D, Marchand AL, Ferrandon D, Jossinet F. Genome engineering in the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata using the CRISPR‐Cas9 system. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:35766. PubMed PMC

Weninger A, Hatzl A‐M, Schmid C, Vogl T, Glieder A. Combinatorial optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 expression enables precision genome engineering in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris . J Biotechnol. 2016; 235:139–149. PubMed

Cregg JM, Barringer KJ, Hessler AY, Madden KR. Pichia pastoris as a host system for transformations. Mol Cell Biol. 1985; 5:3376–3385. PubMed PMC

Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR‐Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014; 157:1262–1278. PubMed PMC

Ran FA, Hsu PD, Lin C, et al. Double nicking by RNA‐guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell. 2013; 154:1380–1389. PubMed PMC

Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013; 339:819–823. PubMed PMC

Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA‐guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31:827–832. PubMed PMC

Sturmberger L, Chappell T, Geier M, et al. Refined Pichia pastoris reference genome sequence. J Biotechnol. 2016; 235:121–131. PubMed PMC

Krainer FW, Gmeiner C, Neutsch L, et al. Knockout of an endogenous mannosyltransferase increases the homogeneity of glycoproteins produced in Pichia pastoris . Sci Rep. 2013; 3:3279. PubMed PMC

Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang R, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, Smith HO. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods. 2009; 6:343–345. PubMed

Weninger A, Glieder A, Vogl T. A toolbox of endogenous and heterologous nuclear localization sequences for the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris . Ah Kang H., ed. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015; 15:p.fov082. PubMed PMC

Vogl T, Sturmberger L, Kickenweiz T, et al. A toolbox of diverse promoters related to methanol utilization: functionally verified parts for heterologous pathway expression in Pichia pastoris . ACS Synth Biol. 2016; 5:172–186. PubMed

Lieber MR. NHEJ and its backup pathways in chromosomal translocations. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010; 17:393–395. PubMed PMC

Bétermier M, Bertrand P, Lopez BS. Is non‐homologous end‐joining really an inherently error‐prone process? PLoS Genetics 2014; 10:e1004086. PubMed PMC

Brunet E, Simsek D, Tomishima M, et al. Chromosomal translocations induced at specified loci in human stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106:10620–10625. PubMed PMC

Gao S, Tong Y, Wen Z, et al. Multiplex gene editing of the Yarrowia lipolytica genome using the CRISPR‐Cas9 system. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016; 43:1085–1093. PubMed

Schwartz CM, Shabbir‐Hussain M, Blenner M, Wheeldon I. Synthetic RNA polymerase III promoters facilitate high‐efficiency CRISPR‐Cas9‐mediated genome editing in Yarrowia lipolytica . ACS Synth Biol. 2016; 5:356–359. PubMed

Saffran WA, Greenberg RB, Thaler‐scheer MS, Jones MM. Single strand and double strand DNA damage‐induced reciprocal recombination in yeast. Dependence on nucleotide excision repair and RAD1 recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994; 22:2823–2829. PubMed PMC

Tsakraklides V, Brevnova E, Stephanopoulos G, Shaw AJ. Improved gene targeting through cell cycle synchronization. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:1–11. PubMed PMC

Anders C, Niewoehner O, Duerst A, Jinek M. Structural basis of PAM‐dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature. 2014; 513:569–573. PubMed PMC

Krainer FW, Dietzsch C, Hajek T, Herwig C, Spadiut O, Glieder A. Recombinant protein expression in Pichia pastoris strains with an engineered methanol utilization pathway. Microb Cell Fact. 2012; 11:22. PubMed PMC

Vogl T, Glieder A. Regulation of Pichia pastoris promoters and its consequences for protein production. New Biotechnol. 2013; 30:385–404. PubMed

Geier M, Brandner C, Strohmeier GA, Hall M, Hartner FS, Glieder A. Engineering Pichia pastoris for improved NADH regeneration: a novel chassis strain for whole‐cell catalysis. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2015; 11:1741–1748. PubMed PMC

Vogl T, Hartner FS, Glieder A. New opportunities by synthetic biology for biopharmaceutical production in Pichia pastoris . Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013; 24:1094–1101. PubMed PMC

Maruyama T, Dougan SK, Truttmann MC, Bilate AM, Ingram JR, Ploegh HL. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR‐Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining. Nat Biotech. 2015; 33:538–542. PubMed PMC

Engineering of the unfolded protein response pathway in Pichia pastoris: enhancing production of secreted recombinant proteins