Long-term prognosis of young breast cancer patients (≤40 years) who did not receive adjuvant systemic treatment: protocol for the PARADIGM initiative cohort study
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
29138205
PubMed Central
PMC5695414
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017842
PII: bmjopen-2017-017842
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- breast tumours, epidemiology, histopathology,
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- exprese genu MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prsu genetika metabolismus patologie chirurgie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- receptor erbB-2 metabolismus MeSH
- receptory pro estrogeny metabolismus MeSH
- receptory progesteronu metabolismus MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- výzkumný projekt * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- ERBB2 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- receptor erbB-2 MeSH
- receptory pro estrogeny MeSH
- receptory progesteronu MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Currently used tools for breast cancer prognostication and prediction may not adequately reflect a young patient's prognosis or likely treatment benefit because they were not adequately validated in young patients. Since breast cancers diagnosed at a young age are considered prognostically unfavourable, many treatment guidelines recommend adjuvant systemic treatment for all young patients. Patients cured by locoregional treatment alone are, therefore, overtreated. Lack of prognosticators for young breast cancer patients represents an unmet medical need and has led to the initiation of the PAtients with bReAst cancer DIaGnosed preMenopausally (PARADIGM) initiative. Our aim is to reduce overtreatment of women diagnosed with breast cancer aged ≤40 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All young, adjuvant systemic treatment naive breast cancer patients, who had no prior malignancy and were diagnosed between 1989 and 2000, were identified using the population based Netherlands Cancer Registry (n=3525). Archival tumour tissues were retrieved through linkage with the Dutch nationwide pathology registry. Tissue slides will be digitalised and placed on an online image database platform for clinicopathological revision by an international team of breast pathologists. Immunohistochemical subtype will be assessed using tissue microarrays. Tumour RNA will be isolated and subjected to next-generation sequencing. Differences in gene expression found between patients with a favourable and those with a less favourable prognosis will be used to establish a prognostic classifier, using the triple negative patients as proof of principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Observational data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and left over archival patient material are used. Therefore, the Dutch law on Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) is not applicable. The PARADIGM study received a 'non-WMO' declaration from the Medical Ethics Committee of the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, waiving individual patient consent. All data and material used are stored in a coded way. Study results will be presented at international (breast cancer) conferences and published in peer-reviewed, open-access journals.
Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO IRCCS Candiolo Piemonte Italy
Department of Epidemiology Maastricht University Maastricht Limburg Netherlands
Department of Medical Sciences University of Torino Torino Italy
Department of Pathology Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen Gelderland Netherlands
Department of Pathology Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra Pamplona Spain
Department of Pathology ErasmusMC Cancer Institute Rotterdam Zuid Holland Netherlands
Department of Pathology Gelre Ziekenhuizen Apeldoorn Gelderland Netherlands
Department of Pathology IsalaKlinieken Zwolle Zwolle Overijssel Netherlands
Department of Pathology Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum Leiden Zuid Holland Netherlands
Department of Pathology Rion University Hospital University of Patras Medical School Patras Greece
Department of Pathology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands
Department of Research Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization Utrecht Utrecht UK
Departmentof Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Catholic Universityof Leuven Leuven Belgium
Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands
Division of Molecular Pathology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam Noord Holland Netherlands
Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Charles University Prague Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Institute of Surgical Pathology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
Medical Image Analysis Group Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Eindhoven Noord Brabant Netherlands
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Engelhardt EG, Garvelink MM, de Haes JH, et al. . Predicting and communicating the risk of recurrence and death in women with early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review of risk prediction models. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:238–50. 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3417 PubMed DOI
Partridge AH, Hughes ME, Warner ET, et al. . Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:3308–14. 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8013 PubMed DOI
Azim HA, Michiels S, Bedard PL, et al. . Elucidating prognosis and biology of breast cancer arising in young women using gene expression profiling. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:1341–51. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2599 PubMed DOI
Anders CK, Hsu DS, Broadwater G, et al. . Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3324–30. 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2471 PubMed DOI
Bharat A, Aft RL, Gao F, et al. . Patient and tumor characteristics associated with increased mortality in young women (< or =40 years) with breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2009;100:248–51. 10.1002/jso.21268 PubMed DOI
El Saghir NS, Seoud M, Khalil MK, et al. . Effects of young age at presentation on survival in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2006;6:194 10.1186/1471-2407-6-194 PubMed DOI PMC
Cancello G, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, et al. . Prognosis and adjuvant treatment effects in selected breast cancer subtypes of very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2010;21:1974–81. 10.1093/annonc/mdq072 PubMed DOI
Colak D, Nofal A, Albakheet A, et al. . Age-specific gene expression signatures for breast tumors and cross-species conserved potential cancer progression markers in young women. PLoS One 2013;8:e63204 10.1371/journal.pone.0063204 PubMed DOI PMC
Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, et al. . Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol 2009;36:237–49. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.03.001 PubMed DOI PMC
Mook S, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJ, et al. . Calibration and discriminatory accuracy of prognosis calculation for breast cancer with the online Adjuvant! program: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:1070–6. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70254-2 PubMed DOI
Consensus conference. Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. JAMA 1985;254:3461–3. PubMed
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Senn HJ, et al. . Fifth International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer, St Gallen, March 1995. International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Eur J Cancer 1995;31A:1754–9. PubMed
Zujewski J, Liu ET. The 1998 St. Gallen’s Consensus Conference: an assessment. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1587–9. 10.1093/jnci/90.21.1587 PubMed DOI
Oncoline-Dutch breast cancer guideline. Hormonal therapy (breast cancer). https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/en/richtlijn/breast_cancer/adjuvant_systemic_therapy/hormonal_therapy.html (accessed 20 Nov 2016).
van der Sangen MJ, Voogd AC, van de Poll-Franse LV, et al. . [Breast cancer in young women: epidemiology and treatment dilemmas]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:2495–500. PubMed
Netherlands Cancer Registry - Breast cancer incidence. http://www.cijfersoverkanker.nl/selecties/dataset_2/img5866634cb90cf (accessed 30 Dec 2016).
van der Hage JA, Mieog JS, van de Velde CJ, et al. . Impact of established prognostic factors and molecular subtype in very young breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of four EORTC randomized controlled trials. Breast Cancer Res 2011;13:R68 10.1186/bcr2908 PubMed DOI PMC
Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. . Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:4429–34. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045 PubMed DOI
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G, et al. . Deep learning. Nature 2015;521:436–44. 10.1038/nature14539 PubMed DOI
Litjens G, Sánchez CI, Timofeeva N, et al. . Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis. Sci Rep 2016;6:26286 10.1038/srep26286 PubMed DOI PMC
PALGA. The nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands. http://www.palga.nl/en/ (accessed 22 Nov 2016). PubMed
tEPIS. Pathology imagemanagement and sharing. http://www.ctmm-trait.nl/trait-tools/tepis (accessed 9 Aug 2016).
TraIT OpenClinica - Open Source for Clinical Research. http://www.ctmm-trait.nl/trait-tools/OpenClinica (accessed 9 Aug 2016).
Hugh J, Hanson J, Cheang MC, et al. . Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1168–76. 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1024 PubMed DOI PMC
The Genomics Core Facility experiment database. http://gcfdb.nki.nl/ (accessed 22 Nov 2016).
Federa - Codes of Conduct. https://www.federa.org/codes-conduct (accessed 9 Aug 2016).
Al-Janabi S, van Slooten HJ, Visser M, et al. . Evaluation of mitotic activity index in breast cancer using whole slide digital images. PLoS One 2013;8:e82576 10.1371/journal.pone.0082576 PubMed DOI PMC
Shaw EC, Hanby AM, Wheeler K, et al. . Observer agreement comparing the use of virtual slides with glass slides in the pathology review component of the POSH breast cancer cohort study. J Clin Pathol 2012;65:403–8. 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200369 PubMed DOI