Adjusted comparison of daratumumab monotherapy versus real-world historical control data from the Czech Republic in heavily pretreated and highly refractory multiple myeloma patients
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- Klíčová slova
- Czech Republic, daratumumab, matching adjusted indirect comparison, multiple myeloma, treatment outcomes,
- MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom farmakoterapie MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití MeSH
- protinádorové látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Názvy látek
- daratumumab MeSH Prohlížeč
- monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- protinádorové látky MeSH
OBJECTIVES: We conducted an adjusted comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for daratumumab monotherapy versus standard of care, as observed in a real-world historical cohort of heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients from Czech Republic. METHODS: Using longitudinal chart data from the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG) of the Czech Myeloma Group, patient-level data from the RMG was pooled with pivotal daratumumab monotherapy studies (GEN501 and SIRIUS; 16 mg/kg). RESULTS: From the RMG database, we identified 972 treatment lines in 463 patients previously treated with both a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug. Treatment initiation dates for RMG patients were between March 2006 and March 2015. The most frequently used treatment regimens were lenalidomide-based regimens (33.4%), chemotherapy (18.1%), bortezomib-based regimens (13.6%), thalidomide-based regimens (8.0%), and bortezomib plus thalidomide (5.3%). Few patients were treated with carfilzomib-based regimens (2.5%) and pomalidomide-based regimens (2.4%). Median observed PFS for daratumumab and the RMG cohort was 4.0 and 5.8 months (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.39), respectively, and unadjusted median OS was 20.1 and 11.9 months (unadjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.78), respectively. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made using patient-level data. The adjusted HRs (95% CI) for PFS and OS for daratumumab versus the RMG cohort were 0.79 (0.56-1.12; p = .192) and 0.33 (0.21-0.52; p < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted comparisons between trial data and historical cohorts can provide useful insights to clinicians and reimbursement decision makers on relative treatment efficacies in the absence of head-to-head comparison studies for daratumumab monotherapy.
g Department of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine Pelhrimov Hospital Pelhřimov Czech Republic
h Department of Clinical Hematology Hospital Ceske Budejovice České Budějovice Czech Republic
i Department of Hematology General Hospital Liberec Liberec Czech Republic
j Department of Clinical Hematology Silesian Hospital Opava Opava Czech Republic
Janssen Health Economics and Market Access EMEA Statistics and Modelling Beerse Belgium
k Department of Hematology Hospital Novy Jicin Nový Jičín Czech Republic
l Department of Clinical Hematology General Hospital Havirov Havířov Czech Republic
o Janssen Health Economics and Market Access EMEA Athens Greece
p Janssen Cilag s r o Smíchov Anděl Czech Republic
q Janssen Health Economics and Market Access EMEA High Wycombe UK
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org