Redefining Knee Balance in a Medially Stabilized Prosthesis: An In-Vitro Study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené arabské emiráty Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
29290852
PubMed Central
PMC5721310
DOI
10.2174/1874325001711011165
PII: TOORTHJ-11-1165
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cadaveric study, Ligament balancing, Ligament release, Medially stabilized knee, Prosthetic design, Total knee arthroplasty,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: To date, there is still no consensus on what soft tissues must be preserved and what structures can be safely released during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a medially stabilized implant. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of a progressive selective release of the medial and lateral soft tissues in a knee implanted with a medially stabilized prosthesis. METHOD: Six cadaveric fresh-frozen full leg specimens were tested. In each case, kinematic pattern and mediolateral laxity were measured in three stages: firstly, prior to implantation; secondly, after the implantation of the trial components, but before any soft tissue release; and thirdly, progressively as soft tissue was released with the trial implant in place. The incremental impact of each selective release on knee balance was then analyzed. RESULTS: In all cases sagittal stability was not affected by the progressive release of the lateral soft tissue envelope. It was possible to perform progressive lateral release provided the anterior one-third of the iliotibial band (ITB) remained intact. Progressive medial release could be performed on the medial side provided the anterior fibers of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) remained intact. CONCLUSION: The medially conforming implant remains stable provided the anterior fibers of sMCL and the anterior fibers of the ITB remain intact. The implant's sagittal stability is mainly dependent on its medial ball-in-socket design.
AZ Maria Middelares Buitenring Sint Denijs 30 9000 Gent Belgium
Charles University 1st Orthopaedic Clinic Faculty of Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Clinique Générale Annecy 4 Chemin de la Tour la Reine 74000 Annecy France
University Hospital Balgrist Forchstrasse 340 8008 Zürich Switzerland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Freeman M.A., Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J. Biomech. 2005;38(2):197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.006. PubMed DOI
Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Colwell C.E., Jr, Ranawat C.S., Scott R.D., Thornhill T.S., Lapp M.A. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998;(356):47–57. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00009. PubMed DOI
Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Stiehl J.B., Walker S.A., Dennis K.N. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: The effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J. Arthroplasty. 1998;13(7):748–752. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90025-0. PubMed DOI
Heesterbeek P.J., Haffner N., Wymenga A.B., Stifter J., Ritschl P. Patient-related factors influence stiffness of the soft tissue complex during intraoperative gap balancing in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3694-5. PubMed DOI
Aunan E., Kibsgård T.J., Diep L.M., Röhrl S.M. Intraoperative ligament laxity influences functional outcome 1 year after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015;23(6):1684–1692. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3108-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Babazadeh S., Stoney J.D., Lim K., Choong P.F. The relevance of ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: How important is it? A systematic review of the literature. Orthop. Rev. (Pavia) 2009;1(2):e26. doi: 10.4081/or.2009.e26. PubMed DOI PMC
Heesterbeek P.J., Verdonschot N., Wymenga A.B. In vivo knee laxity in flexion and extension: A radiographic study in 30 older healthy subjects. Knee. 2008;15(1):45–49. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.09.007. PubMed DOI
Athwal K.K., Hunt N.C., Davies A.J., Deehan D.J., Amis A.A. Clinical biomechanics of instability related to total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 2014;29(2):119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.004. PubMed DOI
Chang M.J., Lim H., Lee N.R., Moon Y.W. Diagnosis, causes and treatments of instability following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Relat. Res. 2014;26(2):61–67. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.2.61. PubMed DOI PMC
Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., Shastri S., Jacoby S.M. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2002;404(404):7–13. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00003. PubMed DOI
Abdel M.P., Haas S.B. The unstable knee: Wobble and buckle. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11) Suppl. A:112–114. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34325. PubMed DOI
Schmidt R., Ogden S., Blaha J.D., Alexander A., Fitch D.A., Barnes C.L. Midterm clinical and radiographic results of the medial pivot total knee system. Int. Orthop. 2014;38(12):2495–2498. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2444-5. PubMed DOI
Bae D.K., Cho S.D., Im S.K., Song S.J. Comparison of midterm clinical and radiographic results between total knee arthroplasties using medial pivot and posterior-stabilized prosthesis-a matched pair analysis. J. Arthroplasty. 2015;31(2):419–24. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.038.. PubMed DOI
Shimmin A., Martinez-Martos S., Owens J., Iorgulescu A.D., Banks S. Fluoroscopic motion study confirming the stability of a medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2015;22(6):522–526. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.011. PubMed DOI
Hossain F., Patel S., Rhee S.J., Haddad F.S. Knee arthroplasty with a medially conforming ball-and-socket tibiofemoral articulation provides better function. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011;469(1):55–63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1493-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Scott G., Imam M.A., Eifert A., Freeman M.A., Pinskerova V., Field R.E., Skinner J., Banks S.A. Can a total knee arthroplasty be both rotationally unconstrained and anteroposteriorly stabilised? A pulsed fluoroscopic investigation. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5(3):80–86. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.53.2000621. PubMed DOI PMC
Daines B.K., Dennis D.A. Gap balancing vs. measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 2014;6(1):1–8. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.1. PubMed DOI PMC
Insall J.N. Technique of total knee replacement. AAOS Inst Course Lect. 1981;30:224. PubMed
Laskin R.S. Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 1995;10(5):657–660. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80211-6. PubMed DOI
Tokuhara Y., Kadoya Y., Nakagawa S., Kobayashi A., Takaoka K. The flexion gap in normal knees. An MRI study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004;86(8):1133–1136. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B8.15246. PubMed DOI
Roth J.D., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Native knee laxities at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion and their relationship to the goal of the gap-balancing alignment method of total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2015;97(20):1678–1684. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01256. PubMed DOI
Bellemans J., Vandenneucker H., Van Lauwe J., Victor J. A new surgical technique for medial collateral ligament balancing: Multiple needle puncturing. J. Arthroplasty. 2010;25(7):1151–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.007. PubMed DOI