Genotypic variability enhances the reproducibility of an ecological study
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
29335575
DOI
10.1038/s41559-017-0434-x
PII: 10.1038/s41559-017-0434-x
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Brachypodium genetics growth & development MeSH
- Genotype * MeSH
- Medicago truncatula genetics growth & development MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Research Design * statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Environment MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
Many scientific disciplines are currently experiencing a 'reproducibility crisis' because numerous scientific findings cannot be repeated consistently. A novel but controversial hypothesis postulates that stringent levels of environmental and biotic standardization in experimental studies reduce reproducibility by amplifying the impacts of laboratory-specific environmental factors not accounted for in study designs. A corollary to this hypothesis is that a deliberate introduction of controlled systematic variability (CSV) in experimental designs may lead to increased reproducibility. To test this hypothesis, we had 14 European laboratories run a simple microcosm experiment using grass (Brachypodium distachyon L.) monocultures and grass and legume (Medicago truncatula Gaertn.) mixtures. Each laboratory introduced environmental and genotypic CSV within and among replicated microcosms established in either growth chambers (with stringent control of environmental conditions) or glasshouses (with more variable environmental conditions). The introduction of genotypic CSV led to 18% lower among-laboratory variability in growth chambers, indicating increased reproducibility, but had no significant effect in glasshouses where reproducibility was generally lower. Environmental CSV had little effect on reproducibility. Although there are multiple causes for the 'reproducibility crisis', deliberately including genetic variability may be a simple solution for increasing the reproducibility of ecological studies performed under stringently controlled environmental conditions.
Department of Agricultural Forest and Food Sciences University of Turin Grugliasco Italy
Department of Geobotany Faculty of Biology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
Department of Soil and Water Systems University of Idaho Moscow ID USA
Ecotron Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Campus Baillarguet Montferrier sur Lez France
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Czech Republic
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle Jena Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Harvard Forest Harvard University Petersham MA USA
Institut de l'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris Sorbonne Universités Paris France
Institute of Agricultural Sciences ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland
Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig Germany
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Postfach 100164 Jena Germany
School of Agriculture Policy and Development University of Reading Reading UK
Senckenberg Biodiversität und Klima Forschungszentrum Frankfurt Germany
Swiss Federal Research Institute Zürcherstrasse 111 Birmensdorf Switzerland
References provided by Crossref.org