Characterization of Respiratory Events in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Suprasternal Pressure Monitoring
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
29458696
PubMed Central
PMC5837837
DOI
10.5664/jcsm.6978
PII: jc-17-00358
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- apnea characterization, esophageal pressure, hypopnea characterization, obstructive sleep apnea, respiratory effort, respiratory inductance plethysmography, suprasternal pressure,
- MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mechanika dýchání * fyziologie MeSH
- monitorování fyziologických funkcí přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- obstrukční spánková apnoe patofyziologie MeSH
- pletysmografie metody MeSH
- polysomnografie MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- sternum MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
STUDY OBJECTIVES: In obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) esophageal pressure (Pes) is the gold standard for measurement of respiratory effort, and respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) is considered an accepted measurement technique. However, the use of RIP could lead to limited accuracy in certain cases and therefore suprasternal pressure (SSP) monitoring might improve the reliability of OSA diagnosis. We aimed to use SSP for the visual characterization of respiratory events in adults and compared results to those obtained by RIP from polysomnography (PSG). METHODS: In patients with OSA, a 1-night SSP recording using the PneaVoX sensor (Cidelec, Sainte-Gemmes-sur-Loire, France) was done. In parallel, PSG was performed according to American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria. A subgroup of patients agreed to have Pes measurement in addition. Characterizations of apneas as obstructive, central, and mixed as well as hypopneas as central and obstructive were done by visual evaluation of SSP, RIP, and Pes in random order by two independent scores (S1 and S2). The sensitivity and specificity of characterization by SSP compared to RIP and to Pes were calculated. RESULTS: Synchronous recordings of SSP and PSG were analyzed from n = 34 patients with OSA (AHI 34.1 ± 24.2 events/h); 9 of them had synchronized Pes monitoring as well. Interscorer agreement for apnea characterization as obstructive, central, and mixed based on SSP, RIP, and Pes were found, with R2 values from 0.91-0.99. The sensitivity of SSP in apnea characterization with reference to RIP (S1/S2) was 91.5%/92.3% for obstructive, 82.7%/76.2% for central, and 87.4%/79.9% for mixed. The sensitivity of SSP in apnea characterization with reference to Pes was (S1/S2) 93.1%/92.1% for obstructive, 80.8%/81.6% for central, and 91.7%/90.8% for mixed. Hypopnea was only classified for the nine patients with Pes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a good agreement in the detection of respiratory effort with the SSP signal using the PneaVoX sensor compared to the RIP belts signals as well as to the Pes signal. These findings were consistently found by two independent scorers. In summary, results suggest that SSP is a reliable signal for the classification of respiratory events and could be used as an additional tool for OSA characterization in clinical practice.
Interdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Heinzer R, Vat S, Marques-Vidal P, et al. Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the HypnoLaus study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(4):310–318. PubMed PMC
Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, Palta M, Hagen EW, Hla KM. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(9):1006–1014. PubMed PMC
Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo CE, et al. for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. Darien, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014. Version 2.1.
Carry PY, Baconnier P, Eberhard A, Cotte P, Benchetrit G. Evaluation of respiratory inductive plethysmography: accuracy for analysis of respiratory waveforms. Chest. 1997;111(4):910–915. PubMed
Boudewyns A, Willemen M, Wagemans M, De Cock W, Van de Heyning P, De Backer W. Assessment of respiratory effort by means of strain gauges and esophageal pressure swings: a comparative study. Sleep. 1997;20(2):168–170. PubMed
Luo YM, Tang J, Jolley C, et al. Distinguishing obstructive from central sleep apnea events: diaphragm electromyogram and esophageal pressure compared. Chest. 2009;135(5):1133–1141. PubMed
Berry RB, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb DJ, et al. Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(5):597–619. PubMed PMC
Cummiskey J, Williams TC, Krumpe PE, Guilleminault C. The detection and quantification of sleep apnea by tracheal sound recordings. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982;126(2):221–224. PubMed
Beckerman RC, Wegmann MJ, Waring WW. Tracheal breath sounds for detection of apnea in infants and children. Crit Care Med. 1982;10(6):363–366. PubMed
Nakano H, Hayashi M, Ohshima E, Nishikata N, Shinohara T. Validation of a new system of tracheal sound analysis for the diagnosis of sleep apneahypopnea syndrome. Sleep. 2004;27(5):951–957. PubMed
Yadollahi A, Giannouli E, Moussavi Z. Sleep apnea monitoring and diagnosis based on pulse oximetry and tracheal sound signals. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010;48(11):1087–1097. PubMed
Meslier N, Racineux JL. Use of Tracheal Sound Recordings to Monitor Airflow During Sleep. In: Peter JH, Podszus T, von Wichert P, editors. Sleep Related Disorders and Internal Diseases. Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1987.
Meslier N, Simon I, Kouatchet A, Ouksel H, Person C, Racineux JL. Validation of a suprasternal pressure transducer for apnea classification during sleep. Sleep. 2002;25(7):753–757. PubMed
Amaddeo A, Fernandez-Bolanos M, Olmo Arroyo J, Khirani S, Baffet G, Fauroux B. Validation of a suprasternal pressure sensor for sleep apnea classification in children. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016;12(12):1641–1647. PubMed PMC
Van Surell C, Lemaigre D, Leroy M, Foucher A, Hagenmuller MP, Raffestin B. Evaluation of an ambulatory device, CID 102, in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 1995;8(5):795–800. PubMed
Escourrou P, Meslier N, Raffestin B, et al. [Which clinical approach and which diagnostic procedures for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome?] Rev Mal Respir. 2010;27(Suppl 3):S115–S123. PubMed
Kushida CA, Giacomini A, Lee MK, Guilleminault C, Dement WC. Technical protocol for the use of esophageal manometry in the diagnosis of sleep-related breathing disorders. Sleep Med. 2002;3(2):163–173. PubMed
Chervin RD, Aldrich MS. Effects of esophageal pressure monitoring on sleep architecture. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156(3 Pt 1):881–885. PubMed
Chediak AD, Demirozu MC, Nay KN. Alpha EEG sleep produced by balloon catheterization of the esophagus. Sleep. 1990;13(4):369–370. PubMed
Stoohs RA, Blum HC, Knaack L, Butsch-von-der-Heydt B, Guilleminault C. Comparison of pleural pressure and transcutaneous diaphragmatic electromyogram in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep. 2005;28(3):321–329. PubMed
Rosenberg RS, Van Hout S. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine Inter-scorer Reliability program: respiratory events. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014;10(4):447–454. PubMed PMC
Ayappa I, Norman RG, Rapoport DM. Cardiogenic oscillations on the airflow signal during continuous positive airway pressure as a marker of central apnea. Chest. 1999;116(3):660–666. PubMed
Morrell MJ, Badr MS, Harms CA, Dempsey JA. The assessment of upper airway patency during apnea using cardiogenic oscillations in the airflow signal. Sleep. 1995;18(8):651–658. PubMed