Resource sharing is universal among connected ramets of clonal plants and is driven both by the developmental status of the ramets and the resource gradients. Above-ground competition forms spatial light gradients, but the role of resource sharing in such competition is unclear. We examined translocation of resources between mother and daughter ramets of Agrostis stolonifera under light heterogeneity throughout ramet ontogeny. We labelled ramets with 13C and 15N to estimate the bidirectional translocation of resources at three developmental stages of the daughters. In addition, we compared the final biomass of integrated and severed ramets in order to estimate the effect of integration on growth. Young developing daughters were supported by carbon, whereas nitrogen was only translocated towards daughters at the beginning of rooting, regardless of the light conditions. Shading of mothers was a major determinant of resource translocation between developed ramets, with carbon being preferentially moved to daughters from shaded mothers while nitrogen translocation was limited from daughters to shaded mothers. Surprisingly, the absolute amounts of translocated resources did not decline during development. Growth of daughters was enhanced by integration regardless of the shading. Overall, A. stolonifera maximizes the resource translocation pattern in order to enable it to spread from unfavourable habitats, rather than compensating for light heterogeneity among ramets.

Department of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Benátská Czech Republic

Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Vídenská Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Alpert P. 1991. Nitrogen sharing among ramets increases clonal growth in Fragaria chiloensis. Ecology 72, 69–80.

Alpert P. 1996. Nutrient sharing in natural clonal fragments of Fragaria chiloensis. Journal of Ecology 84, 395–406.

Alpert P, Holzapfel C, Benson J. 2002. Hormonal modification of resource sharing in the clonal plant Fragaria chiloensis. Functional Ecology 16, 191–197.

Alpert P, Mooney HA. 1986. Resource sharing among ramets in the clonal herb, Fragaria chiloensis. Oecologia 70, 227–233. PubMed

Alpert P, Warembourg FR, Roy J. 1991. Transport of carbon among connected ramets of Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae) at normal and high levels of CO2. American Journal of Botany 78, 1459–1466.

Birch C, Hutchings M. 1994. Exploitation of patchily distributed soil resources by the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea.Journal of Ecology 82, 653–664.

Březina S, Koubek T, Münzbergová Z, Herben T. 2006. Ecological benefits of integration of Calamagrostis epigejos ramets under field conditions. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 201, 461–467.

Chazdon R, Pearcy R. 1991. The importance of sunflecks for forest plants understory periods of radiation. BioScience 41, 760–766.

Chen JS, Li J, Zhang Y, Zong H, Lei NF. 2015. Clonal integration ameliorates the carbon accumulation capacity of a stoloniferous herb, Glechoma longituba, growing in heterogenous light conditions by facilitating nitrogen assimilation in the rhizosphere. Annals of Botany 115, 127–136. PubMed PMC

de Kroon H, Hara T, Kwant R. 1992. Size hierarchies of shoots and clones in clonal herb monocultures: do clonal and non-clonal plants compete differently?Oikos 63, 410.

D’Hertefeldt T, Jonsdottir IS. 1994. Effects of resource availability on integration and clonal growth in Maianthemum bifolium. Folia Geobotanica 29, 167–179.

Duchoslavová J, Jansa J. Data from: The direction of carbon and nitrogen fluxes between ramets changes during ontogeny under simulated competition for light. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.f6q5j PubMed DOI PMC

Friedman D, Alpert P. 1991. Reciprocal transport between ramets increases growth of Fragaria chiloensis when light and nitrogen occur in separate patches but only if patches are rich. Oecologia 86, 76–80. PubMed

Glover R, Drenovsky RE, Futrell CJ, Grewell BJ. 2015. Clonal integration in Ludwigia hexapetala under different light regimes. Aquatic Botany 122, 40–46.

Hartnett DC, Bazzaz FA. 1983. Physiological integration among intraclonal ramets in Solidago canadensis. Ecology 64, 779–788.

Kemball WD, Marshall C. 1995. Clonal integration between parent and branch stolons in white clover: a developmental study. New Phytologist 129, 513–521.

Kik C, Van Andel J, Van Delden W, Joenje W, Bijlsma R. 1990. Colonization and differentiation in the clonal perennial Agrostis stolonifera. Journal of Ecology 78, 949–961.

Kubát K, Hrouda L, Chrtek jun J, Kaplan Z, Kirschner J, Štěpánek J. 2002. Klíč ke květeně České republiky (Key to the flora of the Czech Republic). Praha: Academia.

Li W, Wang J. 2011. Influence of light and nitrate assimilation on the growth strategy in clonal weed Eichhornia crassipes. Aquatic Ecology 45, 1–9.

Luo W, Zhao W, Zeng F, Liu B. 2014. Water but not photosynthates integration exists between mother and daughter ramets of a root-derived clonal shrub. Plant Ecology 216, 331–342.

Magda D, Warembourg FR, Labeyrie V. 1988. Physiological integration among ramets of Lathyrus sylvestris L. Oecologia 77, 255–260. PubMed

Marshall C. 1990. Source–sink relations of interconnected ramets. In: van Groenendael J, de Kroon H, eds. Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing, 23–41.

Pauliukonis N, Gough L. 2004. Effects of the loss of clonal integration on four sedges that differ in ramet aggregation. Plant Ecology 173, 1–15.

Peltzer DA. 2002. Does clonal integration improve competitive ability? A test using aspen (Populus tremuloides [Salicaceae]) invasion into prairie. American Journal of Botany 89, 494–499. PubMed

Pennings S, Callaway R. 2000. The advantages of clonal integration under different ecological conditions: a community-wide test. Ecology 81, 709–716.

Pinno BD, Wilson SD. 2014. Nitrogen translocation between clonal mother and daughter trees at a grassland–forest boundary. Plant Ecology 215, 347–354.

Pitelka LF, Ashmun JW. 1985. Physiology and integration of ramets in clonal plants. In: Jackson JBC, Buss LW, Cook RE, eds. Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. New Haven: Yale University Press, 399–435.

Qureshi FA, Spanner DC. 1973. Movement of [14C]sucrose along the stolon of Saxifraga sarmentosa. Planta 110, 145–152. PubMed

Roiloa SR, Rodríguez-Echeverría S, de la Peña E, Freitas H. 2010. Physiological integration increases the survival and growth of the clonal invader Carpobrotus edulis. Biological Invasions 12, 1815–1823.

Saitoh T, Seiwa K, Nishiwaki A. 2002. Importance of physiological integration of dwarf bamboo to persistence in forest understorey: a field experiment. Journal of Ecology 90, 78–85.

Saitoh T, Seiwa K, Nishiwaki A. 2006. Effects of resource heterogeneity on nitrogen translocation within clonal fragments of Sasa palmata: an isotopic (15N) assessment. Annals of Botany 98, 657–663. PubMed PMC

Sarukhan J, Harper JL. 1973. Studies on plant demography: Ranunculus repens L., R. bulbosus L. and R. acris L.: I. Population flux and survivorship. Journal of Ecology 61, 675–716.

Skálová H, Krahulec F, During HJ, Hadincová V, Pecháčková S, Herben T. 1999. Grassland canopy composition and spatial heterogeneity in the light quality. Plant Ecology 143, 129–139.

Song Y-B, Yu F-H, Keser LH, et al. . 2013. United we stand, divided we fall: a meta-analysis of experiments on clonal integration and its relationship to invasiveness. Oecologia 171, 317–327. PubMed

Stuefer J, During H, de Kroon H. 1994. High benefits of clonal integration in two stoloniferous species, in response to heterogeneous light environments. Journal of Ecology 82, 511–518.

Wang P, Alpert P, Yu FH. 2016. Clonal integration increases relative competitive ability in an invasive aquatic plant. American Journal of Botany 103, 2079–2086. PubMed

Weiner J. 1990. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5, 360–364. PubMed

Xiao K, Yu D, Wang L, Han Y. 2011. Physiological integration helps a clonal macrophyte spread into competitive environments and coexist with other species. Aquatic Botany 95, 249–253.

Xu CY, Schooler S, Van Klinken R. 2010. Effects of clonal integration and light availability on the growth and physiology of two invasive herbs. Journal of Ecology 98, 833–844.

Xu CY, Schooler SS, Van Klinken RD. 2012. Differential influence of clonal integration on morphological and growth responses to light in two invasive herbs. PloS ONE 7, e35873. PubMed PMC

You W, Fan S, Yu D, Xie D, Liu C. 2014. An invasive clonal plant benefits from clonal integration more than a co-occurring native plant in nutrient-patchy and competitive environments. PloS ONE 9, e97246. PubMed PMC

Yu FH, Wang N, Alpert P, He WM, Dong M. 2009. Physiological integration in an introduced, invasive plant increases its spread into experimental communities and modifies their structure. American Journal of Botany 96, 1983–1989. PubMed

Strategies of resource sharing in clonal plants: a conceptual model and an example of contrasting strategies in two closely related species

Rhizome trait scaling relationships are modulated by growth conditions and are linked to plant fitness

The direction of carbon and nitrogen fluxes between ramets in Agrostis stolonifera changes during ontogeny under simulated competition for light