JavaScript is NOT enabled !

Raposo MA, Stopiglia R, Brito GRR, Bockmann FA, Kirwan GM, Gayon J, Dubois A. What really hampers taxonomy and conservation? A riposte to Garnett and Christidis (2017). Zootaxa, 2017;4317(1), pp.179–184.

Holstein N. and Luebert F., 2017. Taxonomy: stable taxon boundaries. Nature, 548(7666), pp.158–158. PubMed

Cotterill FP., Groves CP., Taylor PJ., 2017. Taxonomy: refine rather than stabilize. Nature, 547(7662), pp.162–162. PubMed

Jackson MD, Scherz MD, Zona S. 2017. Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies: a rebuttal to Garnett and Christidis (2017) PeerJ Preprints 5:e3060v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3060v1 DOI

Hollingsworth PM, 2017. Taxonomy: avoid extra bureaucracy. Nature, 546(7660), pp.600–600. PubMed

Lambertz M., 2017. Taxonomy: retain scientific autonomy. Nature, 546(7660), pp.600–600. PubMed

Funk VA, Herendeen P, Knapp S., 2017. Taxonomy: naming algae, fungi, plants. Nature, 546(7660), pp.599–599. PubMed

Hey J, Waples RS, Arnold ML, Butlin RK, Harrison RG. Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18(11):597–603. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.014 DOI

Thiele K, Yeates D. Tension arises from duality at the heart of taxonomy. Nature. 2002;419(6905):337 doi: 10.1038/419337a PubMed DOI

Thomson S. Management implications of poor alpha taxonomy. Aust. Wildl. Mgmt Soc. Newsl. 1997. March;14–16.

Sangster G, Luksenburg JA. Declining rates of species described per taxonomist: slowdown of progress or a side-effect of improved quality in taxonomy? Syst Biol. 2014;64(1):144–151. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu069 PubMed DOI

Chapman AD. Numbers of living species in Australia and the World. 2nd ed. Canberra: Australian Biological Resources Study; 2009.

Kaiser H, Crother BI, Kelly CMR, Luiselli L, O’Shea M, Ota H, et al. Best practices: in the 21st century, taxonomic decisions in herpetology are acceptable only when supported by a body of evidence and published via peer-review. Herpetol Rev. 2013;44(1):8–23.

Rhodin AGJ, Kaiser H, van Dijk PP, Wüster W, O’Shea M, Archer M, et al. Comment on Spracklandus Hoser, 2009 (Reptilia, Serpentes, ELAPIDAE): request for confirmation of availability of the generic name and for the nomenclatural validation of the journal in which it was published. Bull Zool Nomencl. 2015;72(1):65–78. doi: 10.21805/bzn.v72i1.a12 DOI

De Queiroz K. 2007. Species Concepts and Species Delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56 (6): 879–886, https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701701083 doi: 10.1080/10635150701701083 PubMed DOI

Mayden R. L. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem In Claridge M. F., Dawah H. A. & Wilson M. R. (eds.), Species: The units of diversity,. Chapman & Hall; pp. 381–423

Wheeler QD, Meier R. 2000. Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: a debate. Columbia University Press, New York

Zachos FE. 2016. Species concepts in biology Historical development, theoretical foundations and practical relevance. Springer, Cham

Evans DM, Che-Castaldo JP, Crouse D, Davis FW, Epanchin-Niell R, Flather CH, et al. Species recovery in the United States: increasing the effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act. Issues in Ecology. 2016;20:1–28.

Morrison WR, Lohr JL, Duchen P, Wilches R, Trujillo D, Mair M, Renner SS. The impact of taxonomic change on conservation: Does it kill, can it save, or is it just irrelevant?. Biol Conserv. 2009;142(12):3201–3206. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.019 DOI

Gippoliti S, Cotterill FPD, Zinner D, Groves CP. Impacts of taxonomic inertia for the conservation of African ungulate diversity: an overview. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. doi: 10.1111/brv.12335 PubMed DOI

CITES. Standard nomenclature. Resolution Conf. 12.11 (Rev. CoP17). [Cited 11 May 2017]. Available from: https://cites.org/eng/res/12/12-11R17.php.

Hazevoet CJ. Conservation and species lists: taxonomic neglect promotes the extinction of endemic birds, as exemplified by taxa from eastern Atlantic islands. Bird Conserv Int. 1996;6(2):181–196. doi: 10.1017/S0959270900003063 DOI

Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM. 2013. Outdated taxonomy blocks conservation. Nature, 495: 314 doi: 10.1038/495314e PubMed DOI

Costello MJ, May RM, Stork NE 2013. Response to Comments on “Can we name Earth’s species before they go extinct?” Science 341, 237. PubMed

Donegan T, Quevedo A, Verhelst JC, Cortés-Herrera O, Ellery T, Salaman P. Revision of the status of bird species occurring or reported in Colombia 2015, with discussion of BirdLife International’s new taxonomy. Conservación Colombiana. 2015;23:3–48.

Franz N, Gilbert E, Ludäscher B, Weakley A. Controlling the taxonomic variable: taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal. Research Ideas and Outcomes. 2016;2:e10610 doi: 10.3897/rio.2.e10610 DOI

Schuh RT. The Linnaean system and its 250-year persistence. Bot Rev. 2003;69(1):59–78. doi: 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0059:TLSAIY]2.0.CO;2 DOI

Pickett STA, Ostfeld RS, Shachak M, Likens GE (eds). The ecological basis of conservation Heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Dordrecht: Springer; 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6003-6 DOI

Newest 20 citations...

See more in
Medvik | PubMed

Phylogenomic and mitogenomic data can accelerate inventorying of tropical beetles during the current biodiversity crisis

eLife. 2021 Dec 20 ; 10 () : . [epub] 20211220

Elife
ISSN 2050-084X
Source

Borrow
RIS

Find record

In BMC

Taxonomy based on science is necessary for global conservation

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options