-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Centromere and telomere sequence alterations reflect the rapid genome evolution within the carnivorous plant genus Genlisea
TD. Tran, HX. Cao, G. Jovtchev, P. Neumann, P. Novák, M. Fojtová, GT. Vu, J. Macas, J. Fajkus, I. Schubert, J. Fuchs,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1991 do Před 1 rokem
Wiley Free Content
od 1997 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
26485466
DOI
10.1111/tpj.13058
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biologická evoluce * MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- centromera genetika MeSH
- chromozomy rostlin genetika MeSH
- druhová specificita MeSH
- genetická variace MeSH
- genom rostlinný genetika fyziologie MeSH
- Magnoliopsida genetika fyziologie MeSH
- molekulární sekvence - údaje MeSH
- sekvence nukleotidů MeSH
- telomery genetika MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Linear chromosomes of eukaryotic organisms invariably possess centromeres and telomeres to ensure proper chromosome segregation during nuclear divisions and to protect the chromosome ends from deterioration and fusion, respectively. While centromeric sequences may differ between species, with arrays of tandemly repeated sequences and retrotransposons being the most abundant sequence types in plant centromeres, telomeric sequences are usually highly conserved among plants and other organisms. The genome size of the carnivorous genus Genlisea (Lentibulariaceae) is highly variable. Here we study evolutionary sequence plasticity of these chromosomal domains at an intrageneric level. We show that Genlisea nigrocaulis (1C = 86 Mbp; 2n = 40) and G. hispidula (1C = 1550 Mbp; 2n = 40) differ as to their DNA composition at centromeres and telomeres. G. nigrocaulis and its close relative G. pygmaea revealed mainly 161 bp tandem repeats, while G. hispidula and its close relative G. subglabra displayed a combination of four retroelements at centromeric positions. G. nigrocaulis and G. pygmaea chromosome ends are characterized by the Arabidopsis-type telomeric repeats (TTTAGGG); G. hispidula and G. subglabra instead revealed two intermingled sequence variants (TTCAGG and TTTCAGG). These differences in centromeric and, surprisingly, also in telomeric DNA sequences, uncovered between groups with on average a > 9-fold genome size difference, emphasize the fast genome evolution within this genus. Such intrageneric evolutionary alteration of telomeric repeats with cytosine in the guanine-rich strand, not yet known for plants, might impact the epigenetic telomere chromatin modification.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17000937
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170117125433.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170103s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/tpj.13058 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/tpj.13058 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26485466
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Tran, Trung D $u Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), OT Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, D-06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Centromere and telomere sequence alterations reflect the rapid genome evolution within the carnivorous plant genus Genlisea / $c TD. Tran, HX. Cao, G. Jovtchev, P. Neumann, P. Novák, M. Fojtová, GT. Vu, J. Macas, J. Fajkus, I. Schubert, J. Fuchs,
- 520 9_
- $a Linear chromosomes of eukaryotic organisms invariably possess centromeres and telomeres to ensure proper chromosome segregation during nuclear divisions and to protect the chromosome ends from deterioration and fusion, respectively. While centromeric sequences may differ between species, with arrays of tandemly repeated sequences and retrotransposons being the most abundant sequence types in plant centromeres, telomeric sequences are usually highly conserved among plants and other organisms. The genome size of the carnivorous genus Genlisea (Lentibulariaceae) is highly variable. Here we study evolutionary sequence plasticity of these chromosomal domains at an intrageneric level. We show that Genlisea nigrocaulis (1C = 86 Mbp; 2n = 40) and G. hispidula (1C = 1550 Mbp; 2n = 40) differ as to their DNA composition at centromeres and telomeres. G. nigrocaulis and its close relative G. pygmaea revealed mainly 161 bp tandem repeats, while G. hispidula and its close relative G. subglabra displayed a combination of four retroelements at centromeric positions. G. nigrocaulis and G. pygmaea chromosome ends are characterized by the Arabidopsis-type telomeric repeats (TTTAGGG); G. hispidula and G. subglabra instead revealed two intermingled sequence variants (TTCAGG and TTTCAGG). These differences in centromeric and, surprisingly, also in telomeric DNA sequences, uncovered between groups with on average a > 9-fold genome size difference, emphasize the fast genome evolution within this genus. Such intrageneric evolutionary alteration of telomeric repeats with cytosine in the guanine-rich strand, not yet known for plants, might impact the epigenetic telomere chromatin modification.
- 650 _2
- $a Magnoliopsida $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D019684
- 650 _2
- $a sekvence nukleotidů $7 D001483
- 650 12
- $a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
- 650 _2
- $a centromera $x genetika $7 D002503
- 650 _2
- $a chromozomy rostlin $x genetika $7 D032461
- 650 _2
- $a genetická variace $7 D014644
- 650 _2
- $a genom rostlinný $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D018745
- 650 _2
- $a molekulární sekvence - údaje $7 D008969
- 650 _2
- $a druhová specificita $7 D013045
- 650 _2
- $a telomery $x genetika $7 D016615
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Cao, Hieu X $u Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), OT Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, D-06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Jovtchev, Gabriele $u Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), OT Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, D-06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Neumann, Pavel $u Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Branišovská 31/1160, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Novák, Petr $u Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Branišovská 31/1160, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fojtová, Miloslava $u Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC) and Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vu, Giang T H $u Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), OT Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, D-06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Macas, Jiří $u Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Branišovská 31/1160, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fajkus, Jiří $u Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC) and Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic. Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic v.v.i., Královopolská 135, 61265, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Schubert, Ingo $u Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), OT Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, D-06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany. Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC) and Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fuchs, Joerg $u Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), OT Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, D-06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003838 $t The Plant journal for cell and molecular biology $x 1365-313X $g Roč. 84, č. 6 (2015), s. 1087-99
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26485466 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170117125539 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1180077 $s 961504
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 84 $c 6 $d 1087-99 $e 20151130 $i 1365-313X $m Plant journal $n Plant J $x MED00003838
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170103