Long-term occurrence of Trichuris species in wild ruminants in the Czech Republic

. 2018 Jun ; 117 (6) : 1699-1708. [epub] 20180502

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid29721657

Grantová podpora
QJ1510038 Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic
No. 20182005 Grant of Internal Grant Competition of Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague

Odkazy

PubMed 29721657
DOI 10.1007/s00436-018-5841-7
PII: 10.1007/s00436-018-5841-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

The aim of this study was to identify Trichuris species in wild ruminants from 32 localities in the Czech Republic using morphological and molecular methods (ITS1-5.8S RNA-ITS2 region polymorphisms). Trichurids were obtained from 176 wild ruminants (roe deer, sika deer, red deer, fallow deer and mouflons) that were culled between 2009 and 2017. Trichuris discolor is the predominant trichurid of all of the above-mentioned wild ruminants, whereas Trichuris ovis was identified less frequently in roe deer, fallow deer, sika deer and mouflons. Red deer were parasitised exclusively by T. discolor. Young hosts under 1 year of age were more intensively infected by trichurids than were adults (χ2 = 32.02, p = 0.00). Trichurid prevalence results obtained through coprological methods and those based on parasitological dissections differed significantly (χ2 = 16.26, p = 0.00). The regression analysis indicated that the eggs per gram (EPG) threshold (20 EPG) was exceeded only if the host was parasitised by more than 7 trichurid females. Full concordance between the positive results obtained by the coprological methods and those obtained via direct dissections was achieved when the number of trichurid females per host exceeded 51.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Wiad Parazytol. 2005;51(4):307-10 PubMed

Res Vet Sci. 1995 Jan;58(1):5-10 PubMed

Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 1988 Feb;130(2):77-103 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 1998 Jan 15;74(1):79-83 PubMed

Oecologia. 2011 Nov;167(3):635-46 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2003 Jan;89(1):75-6 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2015 Apr 15;209(1-2):133-7 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2012 May 25;186(3-4):350-63 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2013 Sep 1;196(1-2):136-42 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2016 Jul;115(7):2581-7 PubMed

Aust Vet J. 1994 Nov;71(11):361-4 PubMed

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007;119(19-20 Suppl 3):96-101 PubMed

J Parasitol. 1984 Oct;70(5):842-3 PubMed

Res Vet Sci. 2011 Aug;91(1):110-5 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2007 May 31;146(3-4):249-53 PubMed

N Z Vet J. 1986 Mar;34(3):36-7 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2013 Mar;112(3):955-60 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2011 Nov;109(5):1387-94 PubMed

Infect Genet Evol. 2012 Dec;12(8):1635-41 PubMed

Angew Parasitol. 1978 Nov;19(4):194-202 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 1999 Jul;84(1-2):113-23 PubMed

J Parasitol. 1971 Apr;57(2):302-10 PubMed

Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1977;24(1):35-40 PubMed

Parasitology. 1981 Aug;83(Pt 1):91-101 PubMed

Aust Vet J. 1976 Apr;52(4):181-3 PubMed

Trends Parasitol. 2010 Aug;26(8):376-81 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2017 Aug;116(8):2199-2210 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2011 Apr;108(4):1047-54 PubMed

Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1978;25(1):31-4 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...