Derivation of periosteal and endosteal contours taken from transversal long bone cross-sections limits the accuracy of calculated biomechanical properties. Although several techniques are available for deriving both contours, the effect of these techniques on accuracy of calculated cross-sectional properties in non-adults is unknown. We examine a sample of 86 non-adult femora from birth to 12 years of age to estimate the effect of error in deriving periosteal and endosteal contours on cross-sectional properties. Midshaft cross-sections were taken from microCT scans and contours were derived using manual, fully automatic, spline, and ellipse techniques. Agreement between techniques was assessed against manually traced periosteal and endosteal contours using percent prediction error (%PE), reduced major axis analysis, and limits of agreement. The %PEs were highest in the medullary area and lowest in the total area. Mean %PEs were sufficiently below the 5% level of acceptable error, except for medullary areas, but individual values can greatly exceed this 5% boundary given the high standard deviation of %PE means and wide minimum-maximum range of %PEs. Automatic processing produces greater errors than does combination with manual, spline, and ellipse processing. Although periosteal contour is estimated with stronger agreement compared with endosteal contour, error in deriving periosteal contour has a substantially greater effect on calculated section moduli than does error in deriving endosteal contours. We observed no size effect on the resulting bias. Nevertheless, cross-sectional properties in a younger age category may be estimated with greater error compared with in an older age category. We conclude that non-adult midshaft cross-sectional properties can be derived from microCT scans of femoral diaphyses with mean error of < 5% and that derivation of endosteal contour can be simplified by the ellipse technique because fully automatic derivation of endosteal contour may increase the resulting error, especially in small samples.

Central European Institute of Technology Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republic

Faculty of Science Charles University Prague 2 Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

AlQahtani S, Hector M, Liversidge H (2014) Accuracy of dental age estimation charts: Schour and Massler, Ubelaker and the London Atlas. Am J Phys Anthropol 154, 70–78. PubMed

Biewener AA (1992) Biomechanics‐Structures and Systems: A Practical Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327, 307–310. PubMed

Bohonak AJ (2002) RMA: Software for Reduced Major Axis Regression (v. 1.14). San Diego: San Diego State University.

Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, et al. (2010) Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro‐computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 25, 1468–1486. PubMed

Di Vincenzo F, Rodriguez L, Carretero JM, et al. (2015) The massive fossil humerus from the Oldowan horizon of Gombore I, Melka Kunture (Ethiopia, >1.39 Ma). Quat Sci Rev 122, 207–221.

Gosman JH, Hubbell ZR, Shaw CN, et al. (2013) Development of cortical bone geometry in the human femoral and tibial diaphysis. Anat Rec 296, 774–787. PubMed

Hsieh J (2003) Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Huiskes R (1982) On the modeling of long bones in structural analyses. J Biomech 15, 65–69. PubMed

Kimura T (1971) Cross‐section of human lower leg bones viewed from strength of materials . J Anthropol Soc Nip 79, 323–336.

Knussmann R (1988) Anthropologie, Handbuch der vergleichenden Biologie des Menschen (Band I). New York: Gustav Fisher Verlag.

Lovejoy CO, Trinkaus E (1980) Strength and robusticity of the Neandertal tibia. Am J Phys Anthropol 53, 465–470.

Macháček J (2010) The Rise of Medieval Towns and States in East Central Europe: Early Medieval Centres as Social and Economic Systems. Leiden: Brill.

Martin RB, Bur DB, Sharkey NA (1998) Skeletal Tissue Mechanics. New York: Springer Verlag.

Ohman JC (1993) Computer software for estimating cross‐sectional geometric properties of long bones with concentric and eccentric elliptical models. J Hum Evol 25, 217–227.

O'Neill MC, Ruff CB (2004) Estimating human long bone cross‐sectional geometric properties: a comparison of noninvasive methods. J Hum Evol 47, 221–235. PubMed

Poláček L (2008) Great Moravia, the power centre at Mikulčice and the issue of the socio‐economic structure In: Studien zum Burgwall von Mikulčice VIII (eds Velemínský P, Poláček L.), pp. 11–44. Brno: Archeologický ústav.

Prewitt J, Mendelsohn ML (1966) The analysis of cell images. Ann N Y Acad Sci 128, 1035–1053. PubMed

Ruff CB (2008) Biomechanical analysis of archaeological human skeletons In: Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton (eds Katzenberg MA, Saunders SR.), pp. 183–206. Hoboken: Wiley‐Liss Inc.

Ruff CB, Hayes WC (1983) Cross‐sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae: a biomechanical investigation. I. Method and general patterns of variation. Am J Phys Anthropol 60, 359–381. PubMed

Ruff CB, Holt B, Niskanen M, et al. (2015) Gradual decline in mobility with adoption of food production in Europe. PNAS 112, 7147–7152. PubMed PMC

Runestad JA, Ruff CB, Nieh JC, et al. (1993) Radiographic estimation of long bone cross‐sectional geometric properties. Am J Phys Anthropol 90, 207–213. PubMed

Schindelin J, Arganda‐Carreras I, Frise E, et al. (2012) Fiji: an open‐source platform for biological‐image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676–682. PubMed PMC

Skedros JG (2011) Interpreting load history in limb‐bone diaphyses: important considerations and their biomechanical foundations In: Bone Histology: An Anthropological Perspective (eds Crowder CM, Stout SD.), pp. 153–220. New York: CRC Press.

Sládek V, Macháček J (2017) At the End of Great Moravia: Skeletons from the Second Church Cemetery at Pohansko‐Břeclav (9th–10th Century A.D.). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series).

Sládek V, Makajevová E (2017) The assessment of preservation of a skeletal sample excavated from the Pohansko second church cemetery In: At the End of Great Moravia: Skeletons from the Second Church Cemetery at Pohansko‐Břeclav (9th–10th century A.D.) (eds Sládek V, Macháček J.), pp. 19–34. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series).

Sládek V, Ruff C, Berner M, et al. (2016) The impact of subsistence changes on humeral bilateral asymmetry in Terminal Pleistocene and Holocene Europe. J Hum Evol 92, 37–49. PubMed

Sládek V, Makajevová E, Berner M (2017) Dental and skeletal age‐at‐death for non‐adult and adult individuals from the Pohansko second church cemetery In: At the End of Great Moravia: Skeletons from the Second Church Cemetery at Pohansko‐Břeclav (9th–10th Century A.D.) (eds Sládek V, Macháček J.), pp. 35–50. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series).

Smith EL (2005) A Test of Ubelaker's Method of Estimating Subadult Age from the Dentition. Thesis. Indianapolis: University of Indianapolis.

Stloukal M, Hanáková H (1978) The length of long bones in ancient Slavonic populations with particular consideration to the questions of growth. Homo 29, 53–69.

Stock JT (2002) A test of two methods of radiographically deriving long bone cross‐sectional properties compared to direct sectioning of the diaphysis. Int J Osteoarchaeol 12, 335–342.

Sumner DR, Mockbee B, Morse K, et al. (1985) Computed tomography and automated image analysis of prehistoric femora. Am J Phys Anthropol 68, 225–232. PubMed

Sylvester AD, Garofalo E, Ruff C (2010) Technical note: an R program for automating bone cross‐section reconstruction. Am J Phys Anthropol 142, 665–669. PubMed

Takahashi H (1982) Geometrical properties of the femur shaft. Biomechanism 6, 17–25.

Trinkaus E, Ruff CB (1989) Diaphyseal cross‐sectional morphology and biomechanics of the Fond‐de‐Forêt 1 femur and the Spy 2 femur and tibia. Bull Soc R Belge Anthropol Prehist 100, 33–42.

Ubelaker DH (1989) Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. Washington, DC: Taraxacum.