Axial motor clues to identify atypical parkinsonism: A multicentre European cohort study
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
29910157
DOI
10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.015
PII: S1353-8020(18)30274-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Atypical parkinsonian disorders, Multiple system atrophy, Parkinson's disease, Parkinsonian type, Postural instability and gait disability, Progressive supranuclear palsy,
- MeSH
- Diagnosis, Differential MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Gait Disorders, Neurologic diagnosis epidemiology physiopathology MeSH
- Parkinson Disease diagnosis epidemiology physiopathology MeSH
- Parkinsonian Disorders diagnosis epidemiology physiopathology MeSH
- Postural Balance physiology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe epidemiology MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Differentiating Parkinson's disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian disorders (APD) such as Multiple System Atrophy, parkinsonian type (MSA-p) or Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP-RS) can be challenging. Early signs of postural Instability and gait disability (PIGD) are considered clues that may signal presence of APD. However, it remains unknown which PIGD test - or combination of tests - can best distinguish PD from APD. We evaluated the discriminative value of several widely-used PIGD tests, and aimed to develop a short PIGD evaluation that can discriminate parkinsonian disorders. METHODS: In this multicentre cohort study patients were recruited by 11 European MSA Study sites. Patients were diagnosed using standardized criteria. Postural instability and gait disability was evaluated using interviews and several clinical tests. RESULTS: Nineteen PD, 21 MSA-p and 25 PSP-RS patients were recruited. PIGD was more common in APD compared to PD. There was no significant difference in axial symptoms between PSP-RS and MSA-p, except for self-reported falls (more frequent in PSP-RS patients). The test with the greatest discriminative power to distinguish APD from PD was the ability to perform tandem gait (AUC 0.83; 95% CI 71-94; p < 0.001), followed by the retropulsion test (AUC 0.8; 95% CI 0.69-0.91; p < 0.001) and timed-up-and-go test (TUG) (AUC 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.9; p = 0.001). The combination of these three tests yielded highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that simple "bedside" PIGD tests - particularly the combination of tandem gait performance, TUG and retropulsion test - can discriminate APD from PD.
Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Salerno Italy
Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Neurology Medical University Innsbruck Austria
Department of Neurology Parkinson Centre Milano Italy
Department of Neurology Rabin Medical Centre Petach Tiqva Israel
Department of Neurology University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Institute of Neurology Clinical Centre of Serbia Belgrade Serbia
Neurological Institute Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre Tel Aviv Israel
References provided by Crossref.org