Axial motor clues to identify atypical parkinsonism: A multicentre European cohort study
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
29910157
DOI
10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.015
PII: S1353-8020(18)30274-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atypical parkinsonian disorders, Multiple system atrophy, Parkinson's disease, Parkinsonian type, Postural instability and gait disability, Progressive supranuclear palsy,
- MeSH
- diferenciální diagnóza MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- neurologické poruchy chůze diagnóza epidemiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- Parkinsonova nemoc diagnóza epidemiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- parkinsonské poruchy diagnóza epidemiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- posturální rovnováha fyziologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa epidemiologie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Differentiating Parkinson's disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian disorders (APD) such as Multiple System Atrophy, parkinsonian type (MSA-p) or Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP-RS) can be challenging. Early signs of postural Instability and gait disability (PIGD) are considered clues that may signal presence of APD. However, it remains unknown which PIGD test - or combination of tests - can best distinguish PD from APD. We evaluated the discriminative value of several widely-used PIGD tests, and aimed to develop a short PIGD evaluation that can discriminate parkinsonian disorders. METHODS: In this multicentre cohort study patients were recruited by 11 European MSA Study sites. Patients were diagnosed using standardized criteria. Postural instability and gait disability was evaluated using interviews and several clinical tests. RESULTS: Nineteen PD, 21 MSA-p and 25 PSP-RS patients were recruited. PIGD was more common in APD compared to PD. There was no significant difference in axial symptoms between PSP-RS and MSA-p, except for self-reported falls (more frequent in PSP-RS patients). The test with the greatest discriminative power to distinguish APD from PD was the ability to perform tandem gait (AUC 0.83; 95% CI 71-94; p < 0.001), followed by the retropulsion test (AUC 0.8; 95% CI 0.69-0.91; p < 0.001) and timed-up-and-go test (TUG) (AUC 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.9; p = 0.001). The combination of these three tests yielded highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that simple "bedside" PIGD tests - particularly the combination of tandem gait performance, TUG and retropulsion test - can discriminate APD from PD.
Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Salerno Italy
Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Neurology Medical University Innsbruck Austria
Department of Neurology Parkinson Centre Milano Italy
Department of Neurology Rabin Medical Centre Petach Tiqva Israel
Department of Neurology University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Institute of Neurology Clinical Centre of Serbia Belgrade Serbia
Neurological Institute Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre Tel Aviv Israel
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org