Root:shoot ratio in developing seedlings: How seedlings change their allocation in response to seed mass and ambient nutrient supply

. 2018 Jul ; 8 (14) : 7143-7150. [epub] 20180622

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid30073073

Root:shoot (R:S) biomass partitioning is one of the keys to the plants' ability to compensate for limiting resources in the environment and thus to survive and succeed in competition. In adult plants, it can vary in response to many factors, such as nutrient availability in the soil or reserves in the roots from the previous season. The question remains whether, at the interspecific level, reserves in seeds can affect seedlings' R:S ratio in a similar way. Proper allocation to resource-acquiring organs is enormously important for seedlings and is likely to determine their survival and further success. Therefore, we investigated the effect of seed mass on seedling R:S biomass partitioning and its interaction with nutrient supply in the substrate. We measured seedling biomass partitioning under two different nutrient treatments after 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks for seventeen species differing in seed mass and covering. We used phylogenetically informed analysis to determine the independent influence of seed mass on seedling biomass partitioning. We found consistently lower R:S ratios in seedlings with higher seed mass. Expectedly, R:S was also lower with higher substrate nutrient supply, but substrate nutrient supply had a bigger effect on R:S ratio for species with higher seed mass. These findings point to the importance of seed reserves for the usage of soil resources. Generally, R:S ratio decreased over time and, similarly to the effect of substrate nutrients, R:S ratio decreased faster for large-seeded species. We show that the seed mass determines the allocation patterns into new resource-acquiring organs during seedling development. Large-seeded species are more flexible in soil nutrient use. It is likely that faster development of shoots provides large-seeded species with the key advantage in asymmetric above-ground competition, and that this could constitute one of the selective factors for optimum seed mass.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bloom, A. (1985). Resource limitation in plants–An economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 16, 363–392. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.16.1.363 DOI

Bonifas, K. D. , & Lindquist, J. L. (2006). Predicting biomass partitioning to root versus shoot in corn and velvet leaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Science, 54, 133–137. 10.1614/WS-05-079R1.1 DOI

Cahill, J. F. Jr , & Casper, B. B. (2000). Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and belowground competition: field evidence for symmetric competition belowground. Oikos, 90, 311–320. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900211.x DOI

Cambui, C. A. , Svennerstam, H. , Gruffman, L. , & Ganeteg, U. (2011). Patterns of plant biomass partitioning depend on nitrogen source. PLOS ONE, 6(4), e19211 10.1371/journal.pone.0019211 PubMed DOI PMC

Canham, C. D. , Kobe, R. K. , Latty, E. F. , & Chazdon, R. L. (1999). Interspecific and intraspecific variation in tree seedling survival: Effects of allocation to roots versus carbohydrate reserves. Oecologia, 121, 1–11. 10.1007/s004420050900 PubMed DOI

Chapin, S. , Schultye, E. D. , & Mooney, H. A. (1990). The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 21, 423–447.

Deleens, E. , Gregory, N. , & Bourdu, R. (1984). Transition between seed reserve use and photosynthetic supply during development of maize seedlings. Plant Science Letters, 37, 35–39. 10.1016/0304-4211(84)90199-8 DOI

DeMalach, N. , Zaady, E. , Weiner, J. , & Kadmon, R. (2016). Size asymmetry of resource competition and the structure of plant communities. Journal of Ecology, 104, 899–910. 10.1111/1365-2745.12557 DOI

Dijkstra, F. A. , & Cheng, W. (2007). Interactions between soil and tree roots accelerate long‐term soil carbon decomposition. Ecology Letters, 10, 1046–1053. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01095.x PubMed DOI

Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F. , de Sant´Ana, C. E. R. , & Bini, L. M. (1998). An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution, 52, 1247–1262. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02006.x PubMed DOI

Dray, S. , & Dufour, A. B. (2007). The ade4 package: implementing the dualitz diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software, 22(4), 1–20. 10.18637/jss.v022.i04 DOI

Durka, W. , & Michalski, S. G. (2012). Daphne: A dated phylogeny of a large European flora for phylogenetically informed ecological analyses. Ecology, 93, 2297–2297. 10.1890/12-0743.1 DOI

Espeleta, J. F. , & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Fine root demography and morphology in response to soil resources availability among xeric and mesic sandhill tree species. Functional Ecology, 16, 113–121. 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00590.x DOI

Gedroc, J. J. , McConnaughay, K. D. M. , & Coleman, J. S. (1996). Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: Optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Functional Ecology, 10, 44 10.2307/2390260 DOI

Glimskär, A. , & Ericsson, T. (1999). Relative nitrogen limitation at steady‐state nutririon as a determinant of plasticity in five grassland plant species. Annals of Botany, 84, 413–420.

Herben, T. , Klimešová, J. , & Chytrý, M. (2017). Effects of disturbance frequency and severity on plant traits: An assessment across a temperate flora. Functional Ecology, 32, 799–808. 10.1111/1365-2435.13011 DOI

Johnson, P. C. D. (2014). Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R 2 GLMM to random slopes models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 944–946. 10.1111/2041-210X.12225 PubMed DOI PMC

Jurena, P. N. , & Archer, S. (2003). Woody plant establishment and spatial heterogeneity in grasslands. Ecology, 84, 907–919. 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0907:WPEASH]2.0.CO;2 DOI

Karban, R. , & Thaler, J. S. (1999). Plant phase change and resistance to herbivory. Ecology, 80, 510–517. 10.2307/176629 DOI

Kleyer, M. , Bekker, R. M. , Knevel, I. C. , Bakker, J. P. , Thompson, K. , Sonnenschein, M. , … Peco, B. (2008). The LEDA Traitbase: A database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora. Journal of Ecology, 96, 1266–1274. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01430.x DOI

Kobe, R. K. , Iyer, M. , & Walters, M. B. (2010). Optimal partitioning theory revisited: Nonstructural carbohydrates dominate root mass responses to nitrogen. Ecology, 91, 166–179. 10.1890/09-0027.1 PubMed DOI

Lefcheck, J. S. (2016). piecewiseSEM : Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 573–579. 10.1111/2041-210X.12512 DOI

Legendre, P. (2014). lmodel2: Model II Regression. R package.

Leishman, M.R. , Wright, I.J. , Moles, A.T. , & Westoby, M. (2000). The evolutionary ecology of seed size. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, 2, 31–57.

Liu, S. , Siao, W. , & Wang, S. (2010). Changing sink demand of developing shoot affects transitory starch biosynthesis in embryonic tissues of germinating rice seeds. Seed Science Research, 20, 137–144. 10.1017/S0960258510000115 DOI

Lloret, F. , Casanovas, C. , & Peñuelas, J. (1999). Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root:shoot ratio, seed size and water and nitrogen use. Functional Ecology, 13, 210–216. 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00309.x DOI

Loescher, W. H. , McCamant, T. , & Keller, J. D. (1990). Carbohydrate reserves, translocation and storage in woody plant roots. HortScience, 25, 274–281.

Mccarthy, M. C. , & Enquist, B. J. (2007). Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Functional Ecology, 21, 713–720. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01276.x DOI

McConnaughay, K. D. M. , & Coleman, J. S. (1999). Biomass allocation in plants: Ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology, 80, 2581–2593. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2581:BAIPOO]2.0.CO;2 DOI

Mironchenko, A. , & Kozłowski, J. (2014). Optimal allocation patterns and optimal seed mass of a perennial plant. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 354, 12–24. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.03.023 PubMed DOI

Modi, A. T. , & Asanzi, N. M. (2008). Seed performance of maize in response to phosphorus application and growth temperature is related to phytate‐phosphorus occurrence. Crop Science, 48, 286–297. 10.2135/cropsci2007.06.0367 DOI

Morris, E. C. , & Myerscough, P. J. (1991). Self‐thinning and competition intensity over a gradient of nutrient availability. Journal of Ecology, 79, 903 10.2307/2261088 DOI

Nadeem, M. , Mollier, A. , Morel, C. , Shahid, M. , Aslam, M. , Zia‐ur‐Rehman, M. , … Pellerin, S. (2013). Maize seedling phosphorus nutrition: Allocation of remobilized seed phosphorus reserves and external phosphorus uptake to seedling roots and shoots during early growth stages. Plant and Soil, 371, 327–338. 10.1007/s11104-013-1689-x DOI

Parker, W. C. , Noland, T. L. , & Morneault, A. E. (2006). The effects of seed mass on germination, seedling emergence, and early seedling growth of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). New Forests, 32, 33–49. 10.1007/s11056-005-3391-1 DOI

Pinheiro, J. , Bates, D. , DebRoy, S. , & Sarkar, D. , R Development Core Team , (2016). Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models.

Poorter, H. (1989). Interspecific variation in relative growth rate: On ecological causes and physiological consequences (pp. 45–68). The Hague, the Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing.

Portsmuth, A. , & Niinemets, Ü. (2007). Structural and physiological plasticity in response to light and nutrients in five temperate deciduous woody species of contrasting shade tolerance. Functional Ecology, 21, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01208.x DOI

R Development Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Raynaud, X. , & Leadley, P. W. (2005). Symmetry of belowground competition in a spatially explicit model of nutrient competition. Ecological Modelling, 189, 447–453. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.008 DOI

Shipley, B. , & Meziane, D. (2002). The balanced‐growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Functional Ecology, 16, 326–331. 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00626.x DOI

Tilman, D. (1985). The resource‐ratio hypothesis of plant succession. American Naturalist, 125, 827–852. 10.1086/284382 DOI

Tilman, D. (1988). Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Walters, M. B. , & Reich, P. B. (2000). Seed size, nitrogen supply, and growth rate affect tree seedling survival in deep shade. Ecological Society of America, 81, 1887–1901.

Weiner, J. (1990). Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecology and Evolution, 5, 360–364. 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90095-U PubMed DOI

Westoby, M. , Falster, D. S. , Moles, A. T. , Vesk, P. A. , & Wright, I. J. (2002). Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 33, 125–159. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452 DOI

Westoby, M. , Leishman, M. , & Lord, J. (1996). Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B‐Biological Sciences, 351, 1309–1317. 10.1098/rstb.1996.0114 DOI

White, P. J. , & Veneklaas, E. J. (2012). Nature and nurture: the importance of seed phosphorus content. Plant and Soil, 357, 1–8. 10.1007/s11104-012-1128-4 DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...