The elusive relationship between the mental domain and the physical brain, known as the mind-body problem, is still a hot topic of discussion among philosophers and neuroscientists. Rather than solving this problem, our pilot study addresses the question as to whether personality features could influence intuitions of the mind-body problem, or more precisely, whether it is possible to identify a person's intuitive inclinations toward dualism or materialism and their inclinations toward reduction of the mind to the brain. For the purposes of this pilot study, we developed a questionnaire, which employed several theories of analytic philosophy of the mind, in order to determine which category the participants would belong to. These main categories were dualism, non-reductive materialism and reductive materialism. To test whether personality features affect preferences for these categories, the participants were investigated by Cloninger's Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). We found significant differences in the self-transcendence dimension of the TCI between participants who were evaluated as dualists and those who were assessed as reductive materialists. Our data show that the personality dimension of self-transcendence correlates with intuitive inclination toward reductive materialism or dualism. In addition, our results suggest that ideas, theories, and hypothetical solutions of the mind-body problem and possibly even conclusions, acceptance, and disputations of thought experiments of philosophy of the mind can be biased by personality traits. This fact should be taken into account in future discussions of the philosophy of the mind and may also be important for empirical research and an empirical understanding of the mind.

3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia

National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Armstrong D. M. (1968). A Materialist Theory of the Mind. Abingdon: Routledge.

Balestri M., Calati R., Serretti A., De Ronchi D. (2014). Genetic modulation of personality traits: a systematic review of the literature. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 29 1–15. 10.1097/YIC.0b013e328364590b PubMed DOI

Barušs I. (1990). The Personal Nature of Notions of Consciousness: A Theoretical and Empirical Examination of the Role of the Personal in the Understanding of Consciousness. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Barušs I. (2008). Beliefs about consciousness and reality clarification of the confusion concerning consciousness. J. Conscious. Stud. 15 277–292.

Chalmers D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cloninger C. R. (1986). A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatr. Dev. 3 167–226. PubMed

Cloninger C. R. (2009). Evolution of human brain functions: the functional structure of human consciousness. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 43 994–1006. 10.1080/00048670903270506 PubMed DOI

Cloninger C. R., Bayon C., Svrakic D. M. (1998). Measurement of temperament and character in mood disorders: a model of fundamental states as personality types. J. Affect. Disord. 51 21–32. 10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00153-0 PubMed DOI

Cloninger C. R., Przybeck T. R., Svrakic D. M. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A Guide to its Development and Use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University.

Cloninger C. R., Svrakic D. M., Bayon C., Przybeck T. R. (1999). “Psychopathology as variants of personality,” in Personality and Psychopathology ed. Cloninger C. R. (Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; ), 33–65.

Cloninger C. R., Svrakic D. M., Przybeck T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 50 975–990. 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008 PubMed DOI

Cloninger C. R., Przybeck T. R., Svrakic D. M. (1991). The tridimensional personality questionnaire: U.S. normative data. Psychol. Rep. 69 1047–1057. 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.3.1047 PubMed DOI

Coan R. W. (1979). Psychologists: Personal and Theoretical Pathways. New York, NY: Irvington.

Costa P. T., McCrae R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Model (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odesa, FL; Psychological Assesment Center.

Davidson D. (2001). Mental Events. In Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd Edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 207–225. 10.1093/0199246270.003.0011 DOI

De Fruyt F., Van De Wiele L., Van Heeringen C. (2000). Cloninger’s psychobiological model of temperament and character and the five-factor model of personality. Pers. Individ. Dif. 29 441–452. 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00204-4 DOI

Dennett D. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Dennett D. (2003). Explaining the “magic” of consciousness. J. Cult. Evol. Psychol. 1 7–19. 10.1556/JCEP.1.2003.1.2 DOI

Descartes R. (1641). “Meditations on first philosophy,” in The Philosophical Writings of René Descartes Vol. II, eds Cottingham J., Stoothoff R., Murdoch D. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; ), 1–62.

Eley D., Laurence C., Cloninger C. R., Walters L. (2015). Who attracts whom to rural general practice? Variation in temperament and character profiles of GP registrars across different vocational training pathways. Rural Remote Health 15:3426. PubMed

Eysenck H. J., Eysenck S. B. G. (1975). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Eysenck H. J., Eysenck S. B. G. (1991). Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Farmer R. F., Goldberg L. R. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the revised temperament and character Inventory (TCI-R) and the TCI-140. Psychol. Assess. 20 281–291. 10.1037/a0012934 PubMed DOI PMC

Feigl H. (1958). The “Mental”and the “Physical,” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2 Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 370–497

Fodor J. (1974). Special sciences (or: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese 28 97–115. 10.1007/BF00485230 DOI

Fodor J. (1998). “Review of Steven Pinker’s how the mind works, and Henry Plotkin’s evolution in mind,” in Critical Condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind, ed. Fodor J. A. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; ).

Gillespie N. A., Cloninger R., Heath C. A., Martin N. G. (2003). The genetic and environmental relationship between Cloninger’s dimension of temperament and character. Pers. Individ. Dif. 35 1931–1946. 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00042-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Gray H. M., Gray K., Wegner D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315 619–619. 10.1126/science.1134475 PubMed DOI

Haslam N., Kashima Y., Loughnan S., Shi J., Suitner C. (2008). Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures. Soc. Cogn. 26 248–258. 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.248 DOI

Huebner B. (2010). Commonsense concepts of phenomenal consciousness: does anyone care about functional zombies? Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 9 133–155. 10.1007/s11097-009-9126-6 DOI

Jackson F. (1982). Epiphenomenal qualia. Philos. Q. 32 127–136. 10.2307/2960077 PubMed DOI

Josefsson K., Jokela M., Cloninger R., Hintsanen M., Salo J., Hintsa T. (2013). Maturity and change in personality: developmental trends of temperament and character in adulthood. Dev. Psychopathol. 25. 713–727. 10.1017/S0954579413000126 PubMed DOI

Jung C. G. (1921/1971). Psychological types (Revision by R. F. C. Hull of translation by H. G. Bayes). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Knobe J. (2003). Intentional action in folk psychology: an experimental investigation. Philos. Psychol. 16 309–324. 10.1080/09515080307771 DOI

Knobe J. (2004). Intention, intentional action and moral considerations. Analysis 64 181–187. 10.1093/analys/64.2.181 PubMed DOI

Knobe J. (2007). Experimental philosophy and philosophical significance. Philos. Explor. 10 119–121. 10.1080/13869790701305905 DOI

Knobe J., Nichols S. (2008). An experimental philosophy manifesto. Exp. Philos. 1 3–14.

Knobe J., Prinz J. (2008). Intuitions about consciousness: experimental studies. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 7 67–83. 10.1007/s11097-007-9066-y DOI

Koženı J., Tišanská L. (1998). Formální vlastnosti dotazníku TCI testované na datech adolescentů. Cesk. Psychol. 1 75–83.

Leurquin-Sterk G., Van den Stock J., Crunelle C. L., de Laat B., Weerasekera A., Himmelreich U., et al. (2016). Positive association between limbic metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 availability and novelty-seeking temperament in humans: an 18F-FPEB PET Study. J. Nucl. Med. 57. 1746–1752. 10.2967/jnumed.116.176032 PubMed DOI

Levine J. (1983). Materialism and qualia: the explanatory gap. Pac. Philos. Q. 64 354–361. 10.1111/j.1468-0114.1983.tb00207.x PubMed DOI

MacDonald D. A., LeClair L., Holland C. J., Alter A., Friedman H. L. (1995). A survey of measures of transpersonal constructs. J. Transpersonal Psychol. 27 171–235.

Machery E., Stich S., Rose D., Chatterjee A., Karasawa K., Struchiner N., et al. (2015). Gettier across cultures. Nous 51 1–20. PubMed

Nagel T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philoso. Rev. 83 435–450. 10.2307/2183914 DOI

Naude J. H. (2009). Technological Singularity and transcendental monism: co-producers of sustainable alternative futures. J. Futures Stud. 13, 49–58.

Nichols S., Knobe J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: the cognitive science of folk intuitions. Nous 41 663–685. 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00666.x DOI

Preiss M., Kuchařová J., Novák T., Štěpánková H. (2007). The temperament and character inventory – revised (TCI-R): a psychometric characteristic of the czech version. Psychiatr Danub. 19 27–34. PubMed

Putnam H. (1960). “Minds and machines,” in Dimensions of Mind: A Symposium ed. Hook S. (New York, NY: University Presspp; ), 148–179.

Putnam H., Castaneda H.-N. (1967). “The mental life of some machines,” in Intentionality, Minds, and Perception, (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press; ), 177–200.

Robbins P., Jack A. I. (2006). The phenomenal stance. Philos. Stud. 127 59–85. 10.1007/s11098-005-1730-x DOI

Ryle G. (1949). The Concept OF Mind. London: Hutchinson.

Saarinen A., Rosenström T., Hintsanen M., Hakulinen C., Pulkki-Råback L., Lehtimäki T., et al. (2018). Longitudinal associations of temperament and character with paranoid ideation: a population-based study. Psychiatry Res. 261 137–142. 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.044 PubMed DOI

Searle J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behav. Brain Sci. 3 417–457. 10.1017/S0140525X00005756 DOI

Searle J. R. (1984). Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Smart J. J. (1959). Sensations and brain processes. Philos. Rev. 68 141–156. 10.2307/2182164 DOI

Taylor A., MacDonald D. A. (1999). Religion and the five factor model of personality: an exploratory investigation using a Canadian university sample. Pers. Individ. Dif. 27 1243–1259. 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00068-9 DOI

Tobacyk J. (2003). Psychological type as a basic meaning framework for the history of psychology. J. Psychol. Type 62 23–42.

Wright R. (2001). Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny (Vintage). New York City, NY: Pantheon Books.

Yang S., Sung J., Kim J., Song Y., Lee K., et al. (2015). Some personality traits converge gradually by long-term Partnership through the lifecourse - genetic and environmental structure of cloninger’s temperament and character dimensions. J. Psychiatr. Res. 63. 43–49. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.01.020 PubMed DOI

Zuckerman M., Cloninger C. R. (1996). Relationships between Cloninger’s, Zuckerman’s, and Eysenck’s dimensions of personality. Pers. Individ. Dif. 21 283–285. 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00042-6 PubMed DOI PMC