BACKGROUND: Managing medical professionals is challenging because professionals tend to adhere to a set of professional norms and enjoy autonomy from supervision. The aim of this paper is to study the interplay of physicians' professional identity, their organizational identity, and the role of professional autonomy in these processes of social identification. METHODS: We test hypotheses generated according to social identity theory using a survey of physicians working in public hospitals in Italy in 2013. RESULTS: Higher degrees of organizational and economic professional autonomy are correlated with higher organizational identification. Identification with the profession is positively correlated with identification with the organization. CONCLUSIONS: Although the generalizability of our results is limited, this study suggests that organizations should support the organizational and economic autonomy of their physicians to project an organizational identity that preserves the continuity of a doctor's self-concept and that is evaluated as positive by doctors. As a result, organizations will be able to foster organizational identification, which is potentially capable of inducing pro-social organizational behavior.

Bocconi University Via Roentgen 1 20136 Milan Italy

Charles University U Kříže 8 661 Praha 5 Jinonice Prague Czech Republic

University Parthenope of Naples Via Generale Parisi 13 80132 Naples Italy

See more in PubMed

Wilensky HL. The professionalization of everyone? Am J Sociol. 1964;70:137. doi: 10.1086/223790. DOI

Etzioni A. The semi-professions and their organization: teachers, nurses, social workers. New York: Free Press; 1969.

Mintzberg H. Structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1979.

Abernethy MA, Stoelwinder JU. The role of professional control in the management of complex organizations. Acc Organ Soc. 1995;20:1–17. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(94)E0017-O. DOI

Exworthy M. The Iron cage and the gaze: interpreting medical control in the English health system. Professions Professionalism. 2015;5. 10.7577/pp.944.

McDonald R. Beyond binaries: reflections and a suggestion on the subject of medical professional satisfaction. Professions Professionalism. 2015;5. 10.7577/pp.958.

Numerato D, Salvatore D, Fattore G. The impact of management on medical professionalism: a review. Sociol Health Illness. 2012;34(4):626–644. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01393.x. PubMed DOI

Muzio D, Brock DM, Suddaby R. Professions and institutional change: towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. J Manag Stud. 2013;50:699–721. doi: 10.1111/joms.12030. DOI

Byrkjeflot H, Jespersen PK. Three conceptualizations of hybrid management in hospitals. Int J Public Sector Manag. 2014;27:441–458. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-12-2012-0162. DOI

Sartirana M, Prenestini A, Lega F. Medical management: hostage to its own history? The case of Italian clinical directors. Int J Public Sector Manag. 2014;27:417–429. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-06-2012-0070. DOI

Kuhlmann E, Burau V, Correia T, Lewandowski R, Lionis C, Noordegraaf M, Repullo J. “A manager in the minds of doctors:” a comparison of new modes of control in European hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:246. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-246. PubMed DOI PMC

Ashforth BE, Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad Manag Rev. 1989;14:20–39. doi: 10.2307/258189. DOI

Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Soc Psychol Intergroup Relat. 1979;33(47):74.

Elston MA. The politics of professional power: medicine in a changing health service. Sociol Health Serv. 1991:58–88.

Caricati L, Guberti M, Borgognoni P, Prandi C, Spaggiari I, Vezzani E, Iemmi M. The role of professional and team commitment in nurse–physician collaboration: a dual identity model perspective. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(5):464–468. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1016603. PubMed DOI

Caricati Luca, Mancini Tiziana, Sollami Alfonso, Bianconcini Monica, Guidi Cinzia, Prandi Carmen, Silvano Rosa, Taffurelli Chiara, Artioli Giovanna. The role of professional and team commitments in nurse-physician collaboration. Journal of Nursing Management. 2015;24(2):E192–E200. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12323. PubMed DOI

Schulz Rockwell, Harrison Stephen. Physician autonomy in the Federal Republic of Germany, Great Britain and The United States. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 1986;1(5):335–355. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740010504. PubMed DOI

Kronebusch K, Schlesinger M, Thomas T. Managed care regulation in the states: the impact on physicians’ practices and clinical autonomy. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34:219–259. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2008-045. PubMed DOI

Baker LC, Cantor JC. Physician satisfaction under managed care. Health Aff. 1993;12:258–270. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.258. PubMed DOI

Harrison S, Ahmad WIU. Medical autonomy and the UK state 1975 to 2025. Sociology. 2000;34:129–146. doi: 10.1177/S0038038500000092. DOI

Marjoribanks T, Lewis JM. Reform and autonomy: perceptions of the Australian general practice community. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:2229–2239. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00239-3. PubMed DOI

Hickson DJ, Hinings CR, Lee CA, Schneck RE, Pennings JM. A strategic contingencies’ theory of Intraorganizational power. Adm Sci Q. 1971;16:216–229. doi: 10.2307/2391831. DOI

Noordegraaf M, Risky business How professionals and professional fields (must) Deal with organizational issues. Organ Stud. 2011;32:1349–1371. doi: 10.1177/0170840611416748. DOI

Connor PE. Decision-making participation patterns: the role of organizational context. Acad Manag J. 1992;35:218–232. doi: 10.2307/256480. PubMed DOI

Mael F, Ashforth BE. Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav. 1992;13:103–123. doi: 10.1002/job.4030130202. DOI

van Knippenberg D. Work motivation and performance: a social identity perspective. Appl Psychol. 2000;49:357–371. doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00020. DOI

Tajfel H . Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Oxford: Academic Press; 1978.

Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV. Organizational images and member identification. Adm Sci Q. 1994;39:239–263. doi: 10.2307/2393235. DOI

O’Neill JL, Gaither CA. Investigating the relationship between the practice of pharmaceutical care, construed external image, organizational identification, and job turnover intention of community pharmacists. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2007;3:438–463. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.10.006. PubMed DOI

Riketta M. Organizational identification: a meta-analysis. J Vocat Behav. 2005;66:358–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005. DOI

van Dick R, Grojean MW, Christ O, Wieseke J. Identity and the extra mile: relationships between organizational identification and organizational citizenship behaviour. Br J Manag. 2006;17:283–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00520.x. DOI

Hekman DR, Bigley GA, Steensma HK, Hereford JF. Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees. Acad Manag J. 2009;52:506–526. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41330897. PubMed DOI

Johnson MD, Morgeson FP, Ilgen DR, Meyer CJ, Lloyd JW. Multiple professional identities: examining differences in identification across work-related targets. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91:498–506. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.498. PubMed DOI

Hekman DR, Steensma HK, Bigley GA, Hereford JF. Effects of organizational and professional identification on the relationship between administrators’ social influence and professional employees’ adoption of new work behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94:1325–1335. doi: 10.1037/a0015315. PubMed DOI

Morgeson FP, Delaney-Klinger K, Hemingway MA. The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(2):399–406. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.399. PubMed DOI

Rousseau Denise M. Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1998;19(3):217–233. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<217::AID-JOB931>3.0.CO;2-N. DOI

Bergami M, Bagozzi RP. Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. Br J Soc Psychol. 2000;39:555–577. doi: 10.1348/014466600164633. PubMed DOI

Edwards MR. Organizational identification: a conceptual and operational review. Int J Manag Rev. 2005;7:207–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00114.x. DOI

Kilic M, Arslan M, Leblebici DN, Aydin MD, Oktem MK. Managerial control vs professional autonomy: an empirical study on perceptions and expectations of physicians at teaching hospitals in Turkey. J Med Syst. 2008;32:157–165. doi: 10.1007/s10916-007-9118-4. PubMed DOI

Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol. 1982;13:290–312. doi: 10.2307/270723. DOI

Abbott A. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor: University of Chicago Press; 1988.

Freidson E. Professionalism: the third logic: University of Chicago Press; 2001.

Gross E, Etzioni A. Organizations in society. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1985.

Hotho S. Professional identity – product of structure, product of choice: linking changing professional identity and changing professions. J Organ Chang Manag. 2008;21:721–742. doi: 10.1108/09534810810915745. DOI

Knippenberg D, Schie ECM. Foci and correlates of organizational identification. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2000;73:137–147. doi: 10.1348/096317900166949. DOI

Riketta M, Dick RV. Foci of attachment in organizations: a meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. J Vocat Behav. 2005;67:490–510. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.06.001. DOI

Stets JE, Harrod MM. Verification across multiple identities: the role of status. Soc Psychol Q. 2004;67:155–171. doi: 10.1177/019027250406700203. DOI

Alvesson M, Willmott H. Identity regulation as organizational control: producing the appropriate individual. J Manag Stud. 2002;39:619–644. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00305. DOI

Palmer A, Koenig-Lewis N, Jones LEM. The effects of residents' social identity and involvement on their advocacy of incoming tourism. Tour Manag. 2013;38:142–151. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.02.019. DOI

Stokburger-Sauer NE. The relevance of visitors’ nation brand embeddedness and personality congruence for nation brand identification, visit intentions and advocacy. Tour Manag. 2011;32:1282–1289. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.004. DOI