Immune-inflammatory response after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation in a long-term perspective
Language English Country Japan Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
30315494
DOI
10.1007/s00380-018-1281-7
PII: 10.1007/s00380-018-1281-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Bioresorbable vascular scaffold, Immune–inflammatory reaction, Myocardial infarction, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Thrombosis,
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Cytokines metabolism MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Everolimus pharmacology MeSH
- Immunosuppressive Agents pharmacology MeSH
- ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction diagnosis immunology surgery MeSH
- Coronary Angiography MeSH
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention instrumentation methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Immunity, Innate * MeSH
- Prosthesis Design MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Drug-Eluting Stents * MeSH
- Tissue Scaffolds * MeSH
- Absorbable Implants * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cytokines MeSH
- Everolimus MeSH
- Immunosuppressive Agents MeSH
A higher rate of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) thrombosis has been observed after device implantation compared to implantation of permanent metallic stents in recently published studies. The mechanism of BVS thrombosis is currently under debate. To assess whether the immune-inflammatory response after BVS implantation is a potential trigger of BVS thrombosis. The PRAGUE-19 study was an academic study that enrolled consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with the intention to implant a BVS. A laboratory sub-study included 49 patients with an implanted BVS (of which 38 underwent the complete 2-year follow-up) and 52 patients having an implanted permanent metallic stent as the control group (of which 30 underwent the complete 2-year follow-up). Samples for inflammatory markers [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)] were taken before BVS or stent implantation, on days 1 and 2 after device implantation and at 1 month and 2 years for a clinical control. The primary combined clinical endpoint of the sub-study (death, reinfarction or target vessel revascularization) occurred in 4.08% of the BVS group and 7.69% of the control group (p = 0.442) during the 2-year follow-up period, with overall mortality of 2.04% in the BVS group and 1.92% in the control group (p = 0.966). Definite BVS thrombosis occurred in one patient in the subacute phase; there was no late or very late thrombosis. Two definite stent thromboses were observed in the control group: one in the subacute phase and the other in the late phase. Baseline inflammatory marker levels did not differ between the groups. Lower levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP were observed in the BVS group compared to the control group (12.02 ± 5.94 vs. 15.21 ± 5.33 pg/ml; p < 0.01; 3952.9 ± 1704.75 ng/ml vs. 4507.49 ± 1190.01 ng/ml; p = 0.037, respectively) on days 1 and 2 (12.01 ± 6.31 vs. 13.85 ± 6.01 pg/ml; p = 0.089; 4447.92 ± 1325.31 ng/ml vs. 4637.03 ± 1290.99 ng/ml; p = 0.255, respectively). No differences in IL-6 or hs-CRP were observed after 1 month or 2 years in the clinical control. Levels of TNF-α did not differ between the groups in the early period after BVS or metallic stent implantation, nor during follow-up. The immune-inflammatory response is lower during the early phase after BVS implantation compared to that after metallic stent implantation, but the responses did not differ in the long term.
See more in PubMed
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Jun;31(7):1460-5 PubMed
Coron Artery Dis. 2005 Dec;16(8):505-9 PubMed
Eur Heart J. 1993 Jul;14(7):915-9 PubMed
Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):667-78 PubMed
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1203-12 PubMed
J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Apr;27(2):142-54 PubMed
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr;2(4):291-9 PubMed
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):12-24 PubMed
Eur Heart J. 1996 Sep;17(9):1345-9 PubMed
Clin Cardiol. 2001 Nov;24(11):701-4 PubMed
Mediators Inflamm. 2011;2011:565238 PubMed
JAMA. 2005 May 4;293(17):2126-30 PubMed
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Nov 1;86(9):913-8 PubMed
Lancet. 2016 Mar 26;387(10025):1277-89 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1030-9 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 11;340(6):448-54 PubMed
Heart Vessels. 2016 Jun;31(6):841-5 PubMed
BMJ. 1996 Apr 27;312(7038):1061-5 PubMed
Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):937-48 PubMed
Circulation. 2010 Jul 6;122(1):52-61 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):998-1008 PubMed
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007 Jul;27(7):1500-10 PubMed
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):64-71 PubMed
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1267-74 PubMed
Eur Heart J. 2014 Mar;35(12):787-94 PubMed
Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1440-55; discussion 1455 PubMed
Circulation. 2012 Mar 6;125(9):1110-21 PubMed
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 21;120(2):212-20 PubMed
Eur Heart J. 2015 Aug 21;36(32):2147-59 PubMed