International consensus on quality standards for brain health-focused care in multiple sclerosis
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
30381987
PubMed Central
PMC6826858
DOI
10.1177/1352458518809326
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Delphi technique, Multiple sclerosis, benchmarking, consensus, quality improvement, standards,
- MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mozek * patologie MeSH
- neurologie normy MeSH
- roztroušená skleróza * diagnóza patologie terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Time matters in multiple sclerosis (MS). Irreversible neural damage and cell loss occur from disease onset. The MS community has endorsed a management strategy of prompt diagnosis, timely intervention and regular proactive monitoring of treatment effectiveness and disease activity to improve outcomes in people with MS. OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop internationally applicable quality standards for timely, brain health-focused MS care. METHODS: A panel of MS specialist neurologists participated in an iterative, online, modified Delphi process to define 'core', 'achievable' and 'aspirational' time frames reflecting minimum, good and high care standards, respectively. A multidisciplinary Reviewing Group (MS nurses, people with MS, allied healthcare professionals) provided insights ensuring recommendations reflected perspectives from multiple stakeholders. RESULTS: Twenty-one MS neurologists from 19 countries reached consensus on most core (25/27), achievable (25/27) and aspirational (22/27) time frames at the end of five rounds. Agreed standards cover six aspects of the care pathway: symptom onset, referral and diagnosis, treatment decisions, lifestyle, disease monitoring and managing new symptoms. CONCLUSION: These quality standards for core, achievable and aspirational care provide MS teams with a three-level framework for service evaluation, benchmarking and improvement. They have the potential to produce a profound change in the care of people with MS.
Clinic of Neurology Central Military Emergency University Hospital Bucharest Romania
Clinical Department of Neurology Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels Belgium
CRCSEP Neurologie Pasteur 2 Université Côte d'Azur Nice France
Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Department of Neurology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Department of Neurology Ain Shams University Cairo Egypt
Department of Neurology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway
Department of Neurology Karadeniz Technical University Trabzon Turkey
Department of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
Department of Neurology University of Colorado Denver CO USA
Glasgow MS Clinical Research Centre Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow UK
Instituto Mexicano de Neurociencias Hospital Angeles Lomas Mexico City Mexico
National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery ABC Medical Center Mexico City Mexico
NHS RightCare NHS England London UK
PharmaGenesis London London UK
Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry University of Plymouth Plymouth UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Tremlett H, Zhao Y, Joseph J, et al. Relapses in multiple sclerosis are age- and time-dependent. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 1368–1374. PubMed
Sumowski JF, Rocca MA, Leavitt VM, et al. Brain reserve and cognitive reserve in multiple sclerosis: What you’ve got and how you use it. Neurology 2013; 80: 2186–2193. PubMed PMC
Giovannoni G, Butzkueven H, Dhib-Jalbut S, et al. Brain health: Time matters in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2016; 9(Suppl. 1): S5–S48. PubMed
Kappos L, O’Connor P, Radue EW, et al. Long-term effects of fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: The randomized FREEDOMS extension trial. Neurology 2015; 84: 1582–1591. PubMed PMC
Kappos L, Traboulsee A, Constantinescu C, et al. Long-term subcutaneous interferon beta-1a therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology 2006; 67: 944–953. PubMed
Johnson KP, Ford CC, Lisak RP, et al. Neurologic consequence of delaying glatiramer acetate therapy for multiple sclerosis: 8-year data. Acta Neurol Scand 2005; 111: 42–47. PubMed
Rovaris M, Comi G, Rocca MA, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with glatiramer acetate: A multicentre, multinational extension of the European/Canadian double-blind, placebo-controlled, MRI-monitored trial. Mult Scler 2007; 13: 502–508. PubMed
Trojano M, Pellegrini F, Paolicelli D, et al. Real-life impact of early interferon beta therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2009; 66: 513–520. PubMed
O’Connor P, Goodman A, Kappos L, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of natalizumab redosing and treatment in the STRATA MS Study. Neurology 2014; 83: 78–86. PubMed PMC
Goodin DS, Reder AT, Ebers GC, et al. Survival in MS: A randomized cohort study 21 years after the start of the pivotal IFNβ-1b trial. Neurology 2012; 78: 1315–1322. PubMed PMC
Merkel B, Butzkueven H, Traboulsee AL, et al. Timing of high-efficacy therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Autoimmun Rev 2017; 16: 658–665. PubMed
D’Hooghe MB, Nagels G, Bissay V, et al. Modifiable factors influencing relapses and disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2010; 16: 773–785. PubMed
Pittas F, Ponsonby AL, van der Mei IA, et al. Smoking is associated with progressive disease course and increased progression in clinical disability in a prospective cohort of people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2009; 256: 577–585. PubMed
Ozcan ME, Ince B, Bingol A, et al. Association between smoking and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2014; 10: 1715–1719. PubMed PMC
Paz-Ballesteros WC, Monterrubio-Flores EA, de Jesus Flores-Rivera J, et al. Cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and overweight in multiple sclerosis: Disability progression. Arch Med Res 2017; 48: 113–120. PubMed
Kappus N, Weinstock-Guttman B, Hagemeier J, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with increased lesion burden and brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87: 181–187. PubMed
Marrie RA. Comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: Implications for patient care. Nat Rev Neurol 2017; 13: 375–382. PubMed
Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 20–27. PubMed
Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, et al. Get With the Guidelines-Stroke is associated with sustained improvement in care for patients hospitalized with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. Circulation 2009; 119: 107–115. PubMed
Hsu C-C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 2007; 12: 1–8.
Multiple Sclerosis International Federation. Atlas of MS 2013: Mapping multiple sclerosis around the world, https://www.msif.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Atlas-of-MS.pdf (2013, accessed 14 December 2017).
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Multiple sclerosis in adults: Management. NICE Clinical Guideline, CG. 186, London, UK: NICE, October 2014.
Reen GK, Silber E, Langdon DW. Multiple sclerosis patients’ understanding and preferences for risks and benefits of disease-modifying drugs: A systematic review. J Neurol Sci 2017; 375: 107–122. PubMed
Montalban X, Gold R, Thompson AJ, et al. ECTRIMS/EAN guideline on the pharmacological treatment of people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2018; 24: 96–120. PubMed
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns that gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are retained in the body; requires new class warnings, https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm589213.htm (2017, accessed 8 January 2018).
Ruet A, Deloire MS, Charre-Morin J, et al. A new computerised cognitive test for the detection of information processing speed impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013; 19: 1665–1672. PubMed
Benedict RH, DeLuca J, Phillips G, et al. Validity of the symbol digit modalities test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2017; 23: 721–733. PubMed PMC
Langdon DW, Amato MP, Boringa J, et al. Recommendations for a brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Mult Scler 2012; 18: 891–898. PubMed PMC
American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, Association of Rehabilitation Nurses and International Organization of Multiple Sclerosis Nurses. Nursing management of the patient with multiple sclerosis: AANN, ARN, and IOMSN clinical practice guideline series. AANN, Chicago, IL, USA, 2011.
Yamout B, Alroughani R, Al-Jumah M, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: The Middle East North Africa Committee for Treatment and Research In Multiple Sclerosis (MENACTRIMS). Curr Med Res Opin 2015; 31: 1349–1361. PubMed
Rae-Grant A, Day GS, Marrie RA, et al. Practice guideline recommendations summary: Disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis: Report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2018; 90: 777–788. PubMed
Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 162–173. PubMed
Traboulsee A, Simon JH, Stone L, et al. Revised recommendations of the Consortium of MS Centers Task Force for a standardized MRI protocol and clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 394–401. PubMed PMC
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Multiple sclerosis. NICE Quality Standard, QS. 108, London, UK: NICE, January 2016.
Diagnostic delay of multiple sclerosis: prevalence, determinants and consequences