Timing of high-efficacy therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

. 2017 Jun ; 16 (6) : 658-665. [epub] 20170417

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid28428119
Odkazy

PubMed 28428119
DOI 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.04.010
PII: S1568-9972(17)30107-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy initiated early after first presentation of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is associated with improved long-term outcomes. One can therefore speculate that early initiation of highly effective immunotherapies, with an average efficacy that is superior to the typical first-line therapies, could further improve relapse and disability outcomes. However, the most common treatment strategy is to commence first-line therapies, followed by treatment escalation in patients who continue to experience on-treatment disease activity. While this monitoring approach is logical, the current lack of effective regenerative or remyelinating therapies behoves us to consider high-efficacy treatment strategies from disease onset (including induction therapy) in order to prevent irreversible disability. OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review, we evaluate the effect of high-efficacy immunotherapies at different stages of MS. METHODS: A systematic review of literature reporting outcomes of treatment with fingolimod, natalizumab or alemtuzumab at different stages of MS was carried out. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Twelve publications reporting relevant information were included in the systematic review. The literature suggests that treatment with high-efficacy immunotherapies is more potent in suppressing relapse activity when initiated early vs. with a delay after the MS diagnosis. The evidence reported for disability and MRI outcomes is inconclusive.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...