Indications and outcomes of duodenum-preserving resection of the pancreatic head in children
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
30386905
DOI
10.1007/s00383-018-4410-6
PII: 10.1007/s00383-018-4410-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Children, Duodenum-preserving resection of the pancreatic head, Pancreatic insufficiency, Pancreatic surgery,
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Duodenum surgery MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Pancreatic Neoplasms surgery MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Pancreas surgery MeSH
- Pancreatectomy methods MeSH
- Pancreaticojejunostomy methods MeSH
- Postoperative Complications prevention & control MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
AIM OF STUDY: Duodenum-preserving resection of the pancreatic head (DPRPH) with Roux-en-Y pancreatojejunostomy is a procedure used to remove focal pathological lesions of the pancreatic head. Although predominantly used in adult patients, it is both safe and effective in children. The aim of this study was to review our experience with this procedure, with focus on its indications, complications and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of pediatric patients who underwent DPRPH between 1994 and 2015 was performed. Patient files were reviewed for demographic, diagnostic, operative and histological details, postoperative complications. Patients were contacted telephonically and sent questionnaires to determine long-term outcomes. RESULTS: The study cohort consists of 21 patients, 14 girls and 7 boys, with an average age of 11.72 years (range 3 months to 18.6 years), who underwent DPRPH with end-to-end anastomosis of the jejunum to the pancreatic body (Roux-en-Y anastomosis). In four cases the head and also part of the body of the pancreas was resected. In the remaining 17 cases, only the head of the pancreas was resected. Indications for DPRPH were solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (n = 10), trauma (n = 8), pancreas divisum (n = 1), focal congenital hyperinsulinism (n = 1) and pancreatic cyst (n = 1). The length of follow-up ranged from 1 to 22 years (average 9.66). One patient developed a biliary fistula, which closed spontaneously within 2 weeks after stent insertion. A recurrence of abdominal pain was reported in two patients, occurring at 7 months after the operation in one patient and at 1 year in the other. Pancreatic endocrine insufficiency did not occur in any of the 21 patients. Seven patients currently require a low fat diet, five of which need pancreatic enzyme supplementation. An additional two patients need enzyme supplementation without dietary restriction. CONCLUSION: DPRPH is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of large focal pathological lesions of the pancreatic head in children. As a less invasive procedure than pancreatoduodenectomy, it is more appropriate for the developing child.
Department of Anatomy 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Surgery University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1999 Dec;9(6):416-9 PubMed
Ann Surg. 2000 Jun;231(6):890-8 PubMed
Ann Surg. 2000 Jun;231(6):899-908 PubMed
J Surg Oncol. 2001 Apr;76(4):289-96 PubMed
Ann Surg. 1992 Dec;216(6):656-62 PubMed
Surgery. 2004 Sep;136(3):617-23 PubMed
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 2004;49:53-60 PubMed
Br J Surg. 2005 Apr;92(4):467-70 PubMed
J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 May-Jun;9(5):710-5 PubMed
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Aug;201(2):239-44 PubMed
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2006 Mar;12(1):31-3 PubMed
Am Surg. 2006 Jul;72(7):641-3 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Dec;41(12):1992-5 PubMed
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Oct;17(5):317-21 PubMed
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Jun;12(6):1127-32 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Apr;43(4):634-43 PubMed
Ann Surg. 2008 Jun;247(6):950-61 PubMed
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jul;13(7):1321-7 PubMed
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Dec;19(6):354-7 PubMed
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2011 Feb;20(1):50-3 PubMed
World J Surg. 2011 Jun;35(6):1360-6 PubMed
Am Surg. 2011 May;77(5):612-20 PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 2011 Dec;27(12):1271-5 PubMed
Pancreatology. 2011;11(4):383-9 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jan;47(1):130-5 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jun;47(6):1217-22 PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 2012 Sep;28(9):935-7 PubMed
World J Surg. 1990 Jan-Feb;14(1):83-7 PubMed
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 May;95(4):241-5 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 May;48(5):1060-4 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Oct;48(10):2054-60 PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Mar;30(3):253-7 PubMed
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5(9):567-70 PubMed
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Oct;59(4):e38-40 PubMed
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Sep 15;7(10):6889-97 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Dec;49(12):1730-3 PubMed
World J Surg. 2015 Jun;39(6):1557-66 PubMed
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Mar;78(3):649-51 PubMed
Am Surg. 2015 Sep;81(9):909-14 PubMed
Panminerva Med. 2016 Jun;58(2):151-9 PubMed
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Jun;28(3):250-254 PubMed
J Visc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(3):173-181 PubMed
Surgery. 1985 Apr;97(4):467-73 PubMed
Chirurg. 1980 May;51(5):303-7 PubMed
Chirurg. 1995 Apr;66(4):350-9 PubMed
Ann Surg. 1995 Apr;221(4):350-8 PubMed
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1994;83(3):191-5 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Jan;33(1):42-4 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 1998 May;33(5):789-91 PubMed