Identification of patients who will not achieve seizure remission within 5 years on AEDs
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
MR/L010909/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MR/R024847/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
PDF-2015-08-044
Department of Health - United Kingdom
PubMed
30389894
PubMed Central
PMC6282237
DOI
10.1212/wnl.0000000000006564
PII: WNL.0000000000006564
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antikonvulziva terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- multivariační analýza MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- refrakterní epilepsie diagnóza farmakoterapie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antikonvulziva MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To identify people with epilepsy who will not achieve a 12-month seizure remission within 5 years of starting treatment. METHODS: The Standard and New Antiepileptic Drug (SANAD) study is the largest prospective study in patients with epilepsy to date. We applied a recently developed multivariable approach to the SANAD dataset that takes into account not only baseline covariates describing a patient's history before diagnosis but also follow-up data as predictor variables. RESULTS: Changes in number of seizures and treatment history were the most informative time-dependent predictors and were associated with history of neurologic insult, epilepsy type, age at start of treatment, sex, and having a first-degree relative with epilepsy. Our model classified 95% of patients. Of those classified, 95% of patients observed not to achieve remission at 5 years were correctly classified (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.5%-100%), with 51% identified by 3 years and 90% within 4 years of follow-up. Ninety-seven percent (95% CI 93.3%-98.8%) of patients observed to achieve a remission within 5 years were correctly classified. Of those predicted not to achieve remission, 76% (95% CI 58.5%-88.2%) truly did not achieve remission (positive predictive value). The predictive model achieved similar accuracy levels via external validation in 2 independent United Kingdom-based datasets. CONCLUSION: Our approach generates up-to-date predictions of the patient's risk of not achieving seizure remission whenever new clinical information becomes available that could influence patient counseling and management decisions.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kwan P, Schachter SC, Brodie MJ. Drug-resistant epilepsy. N Engl J Med 2011;365:919–926. PubMed
Kwan P, Arzimanoglou A, Berg AT, et al. . Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc task force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia 2010;51:1069–1077. PubMed
Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med 2000;342:314–319. PubMed
Hitiris N, Mohanraj R, Norrie J, Sills GJ, Brodie MJ. Predictors of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2007;75:192–196. PubMed
Sillanpää M, Schmidt D. Predicting antiepileptic drug response in children with epilepsy. Expert Rev Neurother 2011;11:877. PubMed
Wassenaar M, Leijten FS, Egberts TC, Moons KG, Uijl SG. Prognostic factors for medically intractable epilepsy: a systematic review. Epilepsy Res 2013;106:301–310. PubMed
Sillanpää M, Schmidt D. Long-term outcome of medically treated epilepsy. Seizure 2017;44:211–216. PubMed
Arts WF, Brouwer OF, Peters AB, et al. . Course and prognosis of childhood epilepsy: 5-year follow-up of the Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood. Brain 2004;127:1774–1784. PubMed
Huang L, Li S, He D, Bao W, Li L. A predictive risk model for medical intractability in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2014;37:282–286. PubMed
Sillanpää M, Schmidt D. Early seizure frequency and aetiology predict long-term medical outcome in childhood-onset epilepsy. Brain 2009;132:989–998. PubMed
Marson AG, Al-Kharusi AM, Alwaidh M, et al. . The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;369:1016–1026. PubMed PMC
Marson AG, Al-Kharusi AM, Alwaidh M, et al. . The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;369:1000–1015. PubMed PMC
Bonnett L, Smith CT, Smith D, Williamson P, Chadwick D, Marson AG. Prognostic factors for time to treatment failure and time to 12 months of remission for patients with focal epilepsy: post-hoc, subgroup analyses of data from the SANAD trial. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:331–340. PubMed
Bonnett LJ, Smith CT, Smith D, Williamson PR, Chadwick D, Marson AG. Time to 12-month remission and treatment failure for generalised and unclassified epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:603–610. PubMed PMC
Marson A, Jacoby A, Johnson A, et al. . Immediate versus deferred antiepileptic drug treatment for early epilepsy and single seizures: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:2007–2013. PubMed
Hart Y, Sander J, Sharvon S. National general practice study of epilepsy and epileptic seizures: objectives and study methodology of the largest reported prospective cohort study of epilepsy: National General Practice Study of Epilepsy and Epileptic Seizures (NGPSE). Neuroepidemiology 1988;8:221–227. PubMed
Vere D. MRC guidelines for good clinical practice in clinical trials. J Med Ethics 1999;25:280.
Shukralla AA, Tudur-Smith C, Powell GA, Williamson PR, Marson AG. Reporting of adverse events in randomised controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs using the CONSORT criteria for reporting harms. Epilepsy Res 2011;97:20–29. PubMed
Hughes DM, Komárek A, Czanner G, Garcia-Fiñana M. Dynamic longitudinal discriminant analysis using multiple longitudinal markers of different types. Stat Methods Med Res 2018;27:2060–2080. PubMed PMC
Plummer M. Penalized loss functions for bayesian model comparison. Biostatistics 2008;9:523–539. PubMed
Hughes DM, Komárek A, Bonnett LJ, Czanner G, García‐Fiñana M. Dynamic classification using credible intervals in longitudinal discriminant analysis. Stat Med 2017;36:3858–3874. PubMed PMC
Steyerberg E. Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2008.
Kim LG, Johnson TL, Marson AG, Chadwick DW; MRC MESS Study Group. Prediction of risk of seizure recurrence after a single seizure and early epilepsy: further results from the MESS trial. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:317–322. PubMed
Bonnett LJ, Marson AG, Johnson A, et al. . External validation of a prognostic model for seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure and implications for driving. PLoS One 2014;9:e99063. PubMed PMC
Szaflarski JP, Martin RC, Faught E, et al. . Quality indicator for epilepsy treatment 15 (QUIET-15): intervening after recurrent seizures in the elderly. Epilepsy Behav 2017;70:253–258. PubMed PMC
Cockerell OC, Sander J, Hart YM, Shorvon SD, Johnson A. Remission of epilepsy: results from the National General Practice Study of Epilepsy. Lancet 1995;346:140–144. PubMed