How Much Loading Does Water Resistance Voice Therapy Impose on the Vocal Folds? An Experimental Human Study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
30470593
DOI
10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.10.011
PII: S0892-1997(18)30370-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Biomechanics, Electroglottogram, High-speed imaging, Impact stress, Oral pressure, Voice therapy,
- MeSH
- Speech Acoustics * MeSH
- Video Recording MeSH
- Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Electrodiagnosis MeSH
- Phonation * MeSH
- Vocal Cords physiology MeSH
- Voice Training * MeSH
- Voice Quality * MeSH
- Laryngoscopy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pressure MeSH
- Water * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Water * MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Water resistance voice therapy applies phonation into water through a tube. This study investigates how strenuous this therapy can be for the vocal folds in terms of impact stress (IS). It further examines whether it is possible to estimate the IS using the contact quotient (CQ) and maximum derivative from an electroglottogram (EGG). STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: A male participant sustained a rounded back vowel [u:] or [o:] at a comfortable speaking pitch and loudness, and phonated into a silicone "Lax Vox" tube submerged 2 cm in water. High-speed videolaryngoscopy was performed with a rigid scope. Oral air pressure (Poral) was registered in a mouthpiece through which an endoscope was inserted into the larynx. An EGG was recorded. RESULTS: The CQEGG from the EGG and the closed quotient from the glottal width (CQarea) increased, while the maximum glottal amplitude and absolute value of derivative minimum (dmin) and also the derivative maximum from the EGG decreased for phonation into water. Normalized amplitude quotient from the glottal width variation also decreased but the change was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the glottal area findings, water resistance therapy does not seem to increase vocal fold loading (in terms of increased IS) even if the increase of CQarea, and CQEGG suggest so. CQEGG may qualitatively correspond to that of area, but the reliability of CQ (from the glottal area or the EGG) and the maximum derivative from the EGG as estimates of IS in semiocclusion exercises warrant further studies.
Ear and Oral Diseases Department of Phoniatrics Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland
Institute of Thermomechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic
Speech and Voice Research Laboratory Faculty of Education University of Tampere Tampere Finland
Unit of Logopedics Faculty of Social Sciences University of Tampere Tampere Finland
References provided by Crossref.org