A Systematic Review and International Web-Based Survey of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative and Critical Care Setting: Interventions Reducing Mortality
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled
PubMed
30600204
DOI
10.1053/j.jvca.2018.11.026
PII: S1053-0770(18)31044-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- anesthesia, consensus conference, critically ill, democracy-based medicine, intensive care, mortality, perioperative, survival,
- MeSH
- internet * trendy MeSH
- jednotky intenzivní péče trendy MeSH
- kritický stav mortalita terapie MeSH
- lékaři * trendy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mortalita trendy MeSH
- péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu metody trendy MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky * MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
The authors aimed to identify interventions documented by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reduce mortality in adult critically ill and perioperative patients, followed by a survey of clinicians' opinions and routine practices to understand the clinicians' response to such evidence. The authors performed a comprehensive literature review to identify all topics reported to reduce mortality in perioperative and critical care settings according to at least 2 RCTs or to a multicenter RCT or to a single-center RCT plus guidelines. The authors generated position statements that were voted on online by physicians worldwide for agreement, use, and willingness to include in international guidelines. From 262 RCT manuscripts reporting mortality differences in the perioperative and critically ill settings, the authors selected 27 drugs, techniques, and strategies (66 RCTs, most frequently published by the New England Journal of Medicine [13 papers], Lancet [7], and Journal of the American Medical Association [5]) with an agreement ≥67% from over 250 physicians (46 countries). Noninvasive ventilation was the intervention supported by the largest number of RCTs (n = 13). The concordance between agreement and use (a positive answer both to "do you agree" and "do you use") showed differences between Western and other countries and between anesthesiologists and intensive care unit physicians. The authors identified 27 clinical interventions with randomized evidence of survival benefit and strong clinician support in support of their potential life-saving properties in perioperative and critically ill patients with noninvasive ventilation having the highest level of support. However, clinician views appear affected by specialty and geographical location.
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Hospital Pulau Pinang Georgetown Malaysia
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care San Carlo Hospital Potenza Italy
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Anesthesia and Intensive Care Azienda Ospedale San Camillo Rome
Anesthesia and Intensive Care Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini Rome Italy
AOU Mater Domini Germaneto Catanzaro Italy
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre
Center for Anesthesiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Ospedale Cardinal Massaia di Asti Asti Italy
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care A O U Città della Salute e della Scienza Turin Italy
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit Policlinico Duilio Casula AOU Cagliari Italy
Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health University of Cagliari Monserrato Italy
Division of Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit AORN dei Colli Monaldi Hospital Naples Italy
E Meshalkin National Medical Research Center Novosibirsk Russia
E O Ospedali Galliera Genova Italy and Università degli Studi di Pisa Italy
Hospital Santa Chiara Pisa Italy
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Barcelona Spain
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje Belgrade Serbia
Instituto do Coracao do Hospital das Clinicas Sao Paulo Brazil
IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini Ospedale Pediatrico Genoa Italy
S Antonio Hospital Padova Italy
Saint Petersburg State University Saint Petersburg Russia
San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org