Alternative method to measure the VAT gap in the EU: Stochastic tax frontier model approach
Language English Country United States Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
30689663
PubMed Central
PMC6349340
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0211317
PII: PONE-D-17-44519
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Taxes * MeSH
- European Union economics MeSH
- Models, Theoretical * MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
In this paper, we pursue an alternative method to measure the Value Added Tax gap in the European Union using the stochastic tax frontier model. We use the Value Added Tax total tax liability as the input to estimate the optimal frontier of the Value Added Tax, as well as to predict technical inefficiency. Using the latest innovations of the stochastic frontier approach, we aim to obtain the accurate size of the Value Added Tax gap in the EU-26 countries and contrast them with extant estimates. The obtained estimates of the Value Added Tax gap using the stochastic tax frontier model are different from the estimates produced by the top-down method to calculate the Value Added Tax gap in the EU. Moreover, the stochastic tax frontier approach allows us to disentangle the Value Added Tax gap, which is time dependent, from the persistent Value Added Tax gap, which is country specific. The stochastic tax frontier model allows us to test the effect of exogenous factors on the technical inefficiency of the Value Added Tax and propose appropriate policy recommendations.
See more in PubMed
CASE. Study to Quantify and Analyse the VAT Gap in the EU-27 Member States Final Report. CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research; 2013. July Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/docs/body/vat-gap.pdf.
CASE. Study to Quantify and Analyse the VAT Gap in the EU Member States 2015 Report. CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research; 2015. May Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/docs/body/vat_gap2013.pdf.
CASE. Study to Quantify and Analyse the VAT Gap in the EU Member States: 2016 Final Report. CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research; 2016. August Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/2016-09_vat-gap-report_final.pdf.
CASE. Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States: 2017 Final Report, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research; 2017. September Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/study_and_reports_on_the_vat_gap_2017.pdf.
CASE. Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States: 2018 Final Report. 2018 Oct 16. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/2018_vat_gap_report_en.pdf.
Brun JF, Diakite M. Tax Potential and Tax Effort: An Empirical Estimation for Non-Resource Tax Revenue and VAT’s Revenue. CERDI—Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur le Développement International; 2016. November 10 Available at: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01332053.
Battese GE, Coelli TJ. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics. 1995. June 1;20(2):325–32.
Kumbhakar SC, Lien G, Hardaker JB. Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: a study of Norwegian grain farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2014. April 1;41(2):321–37.
Andreoni J, Erard B, Feinstein J. Tax compliance. Journal of economic literature. 1998. June 1; 36(2):818–60.
Elffers H, Weigel RH, Hessing DJ. The consequences of different strategies for measuring tax evasion behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology. 1987. September 1; 8(3):311–37.
Kirchler E. The economic psychology of tax behaviour Cambridge University Press; 2007. June 21.
Warren N and McManus J. The case for measuring tax gap?. e-Journal of Tax Research,. 2006; 4(1):61–79, Available on: https://www.business.unsw.edu.au/research-site/publications-site/ejournaloftaxresearch-site/Documents/paper3_v4n1.pd
IRS. Tax Gap for Tax Year 2006 –Overview. 2012. January Washington DC: IRS; Available at: https://www.irs.gov/pub/newsroom/overview_tax_gap_2006.pdf
HMRC. Measuring tax gaps 2018 edition—Tax gap estimates for 2016–17. 2018. London: HMRC; Available on: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/715742/HMRC-measuring-tax-gaps-2018.pdf
Murphy R. The Tax Gap. Tax Evasion in 2014—and what can be done about it. London: Public and Commercial Services Union; 2014. Available at: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/16565/.
Gemmell N, Hasseldine J. The tax gap: a methodological review In Advances in Taxation. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2012. December; 1: 203–231.
GAO. Tax Gap. IRS Needs Specific Goals and Strategies for Improving Compliance. 2017 Oct. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/688067.pdf.
Raczkowski K. Measuring the tax gap in the European economy. Journal of Economics & Management. 2015; 21:58–72.
Giles DE. Modelling the hidden economy and the tax-gap in New Zealand. Empirical Economics. 1999. November 1; 24(4):621–40.
Allingham MG, Sandmo A. Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics Vol. 1 1972; 1:323–338.
Reckers PM, Sanders DL, Roark SJ. The influence of ethical attitudes on taxpayer compliance. National Tax Journal. 1994. December; 1:825–36.
O'Doherty M. Thinking and learning in the tax evasion game. Fiscal Studies. 2014. September; 35(3):297–339.
Feinstein JS. An econometric analysis of income tax evasion and its detection. The RAND Journal of Economics. 1991. April; 1:14–35.
Feldstein M. The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: a panel study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Journal of Political Economy. 1995. June 1; 103(3):551–72.
Gemmell N, Hasseldine J. Taxpayers' Behavioural Responses and Measures of Tax Compliance ‘Gaps’: A Critique and a New Measure. Fiscal Studies. 2014. September; 35(3):275–96.
Malik S, Mihm B, Timme F. An experimental analysis of tax avoidance policies. International Tax and Public Finance. 2018. February 1; 25(1):200–39.
Barthelemy P. The macroeconomic estimates of the hidden economy: a critical analysis. Review of Income and Wealth. 1988. June;34(2):183–208.
IRS. Federal Tax Compliance Research: Tax Gap Estimates for Tax Years 2008–2010. Publication No. 1415. Washington, DC. 2016 May. Available at: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/p1415.pdf.
European Commission. Tax Policies in the European Union 2016 Survey. Brussels: European Commission, 2016. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/tax_policies_survey_2016.pdf.
OECD. Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies, Paris. 2015. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/tax-administration-2015_tax_admin-2015-en.
Murphy R. Why bother with the tax gap? An introduction to modern taxation theory, London: City Political Economy Research; 2017. Available at: https://www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/348856/CITYPERC-WPS-201704.pdf
Ebrill LP, editor. The modern VAT. International Monetary Fund; 2001. November 5 Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/nft/2001/VAT/.
OECD. Consumption Tax Trends. Paris. 2012. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/ctt-2012-en.pdf?expires=1545400189&id=id&accname=ocid72027156&checksum=3ADA3260EED05240199C4E226E69AC85.
Skatteverket. The development of the tax gap in Sweden 2007–12. 2014. Available at: https://www.skatteverket.se/download/18.15532c7b1442f256baeae28/1395223863657/The+development+of+the+tax+gap+in+Sweden+2007-12.pdf.
Reckon LLP. Study to quantify and analyse the VAT gap in the EU-25 Member States. Report for DG Taxation and Customs Union. 2009 Sep 21. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/docs/body/reckon_report_sep2009.pdf.
Keen MM. The Anatomy of the VAT. International Monetary Fund. 2013 May 16. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/The-Anatomy-of-the-VAT-40543.
Aigner D, Lovell CK, Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics. 1977. July 1;6(1):21–37.
Alfirman L. Estimating stochastic frontier tax potential: Can Indonesian local governments increase tax revenues under decentralization. Center for Economic Analysis, University of Colorado at Boulder. Working paper. 2003 Nov 11:03–19. Available at: https://www.colorado.edu/economics/papers/WPs-03/wp03-19/wp03-19.pdf
Pessino C, Fenochietto R. Determining Countries' Tax Effort. Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economía Pública, 2010. November 2; 195-(4/2010): 65–87.
Fenochietto R, Pessino C. Understanding Countries’ Tax Effort. IMF Working Paper No. 13/244. 2013 December. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/Understanding-Countries-Tax-Effort-41132.
Cyan M, Martinez-Vazquez J, Vulovic V. Measuring tax effort: Does the estimation approach matter and should effort be linked to expenditure goals? International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series. 39. 2013. Available at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/icepp/39.
Garg S, Goyal A, Pal R. Why Tax Effort Falls Short of Tax Capacity in Indian States: A Stochastic Frontier Approach. Public Finance Review. 2017. March; 45(2):232–259.
Alm J, Duncan D. Estimating tax agency efficiency. Public Budgeting & Finance. 2014. September 1;34(3):92–110.
Langford B, Ohlenburg T. Tax revenue potential and effort. International Growth Centre Working Paper. 2015. Available at: https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Langford-Ohlenburg-2016-Working-paper.pdf.
Schneider F. The Shadow Economy and Work in the Shadow: What Do We (Not) Know?. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6423. 2012 March. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp6423.pdf
Schneider F. Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 Other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2014: Different Developments?. Journal of Self-Governance & Management Economics. 2015. October 1; 3(4).
Belotti F, Daidone S, Ilardi G, Atella V. Stochastic frontier analysis using Stata. The Stata Journal. 2013;13(4):719–58.
Kumbhakar SC, Wang HJ, Horncastle AP. A practitioner's guide to stochastic frontier analysis using Stata. Cambridge University Press; 2015. February 2.
Meeusen W, van Den Broeck J. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review. 1977. June 1:435–44.
Jondrow J, Lovell CK, Materov IS, Schmidt P. On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics. 1982. August 1; 19(2–3):233–8.
Battese GE, Coelli TJ. Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. Journal of Econometrics. 1988. July 1;38(3):387–99.
Greene WH. The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. 2008. February 4; 1:92–250.
Mundlak Y. Aggregation over time in distributed lag models. International Economic Review. 1961. May 1; 2(2):154–63.
Schmidt P, Lin TF. Simple tests of alternative specifications in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Econometrics. 1984. March 31; 24(3):349–61.
Wang HJ, Schmidt P. One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2002. September 1;18(2):129–44.
Karakaplan MU, Kutlu L. Endogeneity in panel stochastic frontier models: an application to the Japanese cotton spinning industry. Applied Economics. 2017. December 20; 49(59):5935–9.
Karakaplan MU, Kutlu L. School district consolidation policies: endogenous cost inefficiency and saving reversals. Empirical Economics. 2017. December 29; 1:1–40.