EAHP European Statements survey 2015
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
31156925
PubMed Central
PMC6451568
DOI
10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000964
PII: ejhpharm-2016-000964
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- EAHP, EAHP survey, European Association of Hospital Pharmacists, European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy, healthcare survey, hospital pharmacy practice, hospital pharmacy services, implementation,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The 2015 EAHP European Statements survey was related to sections 2, 5 and 6 of the European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy (Statements). In addition to collection of statistical data about the level of implementation of the Statements, it was also intended to identify important barriers to their implementation. METHODS: The online questionnaire was sent to all hospital pharmacies in EAHP member countries. Data were analysed by researchers from Keele University School of Pharmacy, UK and the EAHP Survey Group. RESULTS: There were a total of 949 responses (response rate 18%). In the first part of the survey, data was collected on hospital pharmacy setting. While almost half of hospital pharmacies served over 500 beds, 80% of hospital pharmacies had 10 or less pharmacists. In section B, we gathered evidence about the degree of implementation of sections 2, 5 and 6 of the Statements and the main barriers to and drivers of implementation. Five questions with the lowest implementation level were then further analysed. Only five countries had 50% or more of hospital pharmacies reporting that the hospital pharmacists routinely publish hospital pharmacy practice research. 67% of participants stated that they had contingency plans for medicines shortages. The majority of countries (n=20) have less than half of respondents using computerised decision support to reduce the risk of medication errors. When asked if an audit had been undertaken in the past 3 years to identify priorities in medicines use processes, the mean percentage of positive responses for a country was 58%. CONCLUSIONS: EAHP has gained an informative overview of the implementation level as well as the barriers to and drivers of implementation in sections 2, 5 and 6. This is essential to inform the plans for EAHP to best support their implementation.
Centre for Medicines Optimisation School of Pharmacy Keele University Keele Staffs UK
Department of Pharmacy University Medical Centre Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
European Association of Hospital Pharmacists Brussels Belgium
Hospital Pharmacy University Hospital Motol Prague 5 Czech Republic
Pharmacy Department National Cancer Institute Bratislava Slovakia
Pharmacy Institute Slovak Health University Bratislava Slovakia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Frontini R. The European Summit on Hospital Pharmacy. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2014;21:255 10.1136/ejhpharm-2014-000517 DOI
Horák P, Peppard J, Sykora J, et al. . EAHP survey and European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy—can we achieve a perfect match? Eur J Hosp Pharm 2014;21:291–3. 10.1136/ejhpharm-2014-000541 DOI
Underhill J, Gibbons N. EAHP European Statements baseline survey 2015: methodology. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2016;23:65–8. 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000893 PubMed DOI PMC
Horák P, Peppard J, Sýkora J, et al. . EAHP European Statements baseline survey 2015: results. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2016;23:69–75. 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000889 PubMed DOI PMC
Ann. Medicines shortages in European hospitals. The evidence and case for action 2014. (cited 15 April 2016).
EAHP statements survey 2016: sections 1, 3 and 4 of the European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy