Sibling relatedness rather than father absence predicts earlier age at menarche in ELSPAC cohort
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
G9815508
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MC_PC_19009
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
PubMed
31164060
PubMed Central
PMC6597510
DOI
10.1098/rsbl.2019.0091
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- ELSPAC, father absence, inclusive fitness, menarche, sibling relatedness,
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- longitudinální studie MeSH
- menarche * MeSH
- otcové * MeSH
- sourozenci MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Many studies during the past 50 years have found an association between father absence and earlier menarche. In connection with these findings, several evolutionary theories assume that father absence is a causal factor accelerating reproductive development. However, a recent study analysing data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) found that father absence does not predict age at menarche when adjusted for sibling relatedness. In this study, we have replicated these results in the Czech section of the European Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood (ELSPAC), which used the same questionnaires as ALSPAC to study a geographically distinct population. Our results support the conclusion that sibling relatedness rather than father absence predicts age at menarche. Furthermore, our results show that age at menarche in 1990s UK and Czech cohorts is very similar despite socioeconomic differences between the two countries.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Charalampopoulos D, McLoughlin A, Elks CE, Ong KK. 2014. Age at menarche and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 180, 29–40. (10.1093/aje/kwu113) PubMed DOI PMC
Morris DH, Jones ME, Schoemaker MJ, Ashworth A, Swerdlow AJ. 2010. Determinants of age at menarche in the UK: analyses from the breakthrough generations study. Br. J. Cancer 103, 1760–1764. (10.1038/sj.bjc.6605978) PubMed DOI PMC
Gill D, Brewer CF, Fabiola Del Greco M, Sivakumaran P, Bowden J, Sheehan NA, Minelli C. 2018. Age at menarche and adult body mass index: a Mendelian randomization study. Int. J. Obes. 42, 1574 (10.1038/s41366-018-0048-7) PubMed DOI
Stöckl D, et al. 2011. Age at menarche and its association with the metabolic syndrome and its components: results from the KORA F4 study. PLoS ONE 6, e26076 (10.1371/journal.pone.0026076) PubMed DOI PMC
Dvornyk V, Waqar-ul-Haq. 2012. Genetics of age at menarche: a systematic review. Hum. Reprod. Update 18, 198–210. (10.1093/humupd/dmr050) PubMed DOI
Medawar PB. 1952. An unsolved problem of biology: an inaugural lecture delivered at University College, London, 6 December, 1951. London, UK: H. K. Lewis and Company.
Williams GC. 1957. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11, 398–411. (10.2307/2406060) DOI
Frisch RE, Revelle R. 1970. Height and weight at menarche and a hypothesis of critical body weights and adolescent events. Science 169, 397–399. (10.1126/science.169.3943.397) PubMed DOI
Wu T, Mendola P, Buck GM. 2002. Ethnic differences in the presence of secondary sex characteristics and menarche among US girls: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Pediatrics 110, 752–757. (10.1542/peds.110.4.752) PubMed DOI
Wronka I, Pawlińska-Chmara R. 2005. Menarcheal age and socio-economic factors in Poland. Ann. Hum. Biol. 32, 630–638. (10.1080/03014460500204478) PubMed DOI
Karapanou O, Papadimitriou A. 2010. Determinants of menarche. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 8, 115 (10.1186/1477-7827-8-115) PubMed DOI PMC
Ellis BJ. 2004. Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: an integrated life history approach. Psychol. Bull. 130, 920–958. (10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.920) PubMed DOI
Quinlan RJ. 2003. Father absence, parental care, and female reproductive development. Evol. Hum. Behav. 24, 376–390. (10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00039-4) DOI
Culpin I, Heron J, Araya R, Melotti R, Lewis G, Joinson C. 2014. Father absence and timing of menarche in adolescent girls from a UK cohort: the mediating role of maternal depression and major financial problems. J. Adolesc. 37, 291–301. (10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.003) PubMed DOI
Webster GD, Graber JA, Gesselman AN, Crosier BS, Schember TO. 2014. A life history theory of father absence and menarche: a meta-analysis. Evol. Psychol. 12, 147470491401200200 (10.1177/147470491401200202) PubMed DOI
Chisholm JS, et al. 1993. Death, hope, and sex: life-history theory and the development of reproductive strategies [and comments and reply]. Curr. Anthropol. 34, 1–24. (10.1086/204131) DOI
Belsky J, Steinberg L, Draper P. 1991. Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: an evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Dev. 62, 647–670. (10.2307/1131166) PubMed DOI
Boyd A, et al. 2013. Cohort profile: the ‘children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Int. J. Epidemiol. 42, 111–127. (10.1093/ije/dys064) PubMed DOI PMC
Smith D. 2017. O brother, where art thou? Investment in siblings for inclusive fitness benefits, not father absence, predicts earlier age at menarche. Biol. Lett. 13, 20170464 (10.1098/rsbl.2017.0464) PubMed DOI PMC
Hamilton WD. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 17–52. (10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6) PubMed DOI
Moya C, Sear R. 2014. Intergenerational conflicts may help explain parental absence effects on reproductive timing: a model of age at first birth in humans. PeerJ 2, e512 (10.7717/peerj.512) PubMed DOI PMC
Szwed A, John A, Czapla Z, Kosińska M. 2013. Influence of socioeconomic factors on age at menarche of Polish girls. Anthropol. Anz. 70, 455–470. (10.1127/0003-5548/2013/0338) PubMed DOI
Thomas F, Renaud F, Benefice E, de Meeus T, Guegan J-F. 2001. International variability of ages at menarche and menopause: patterns and main determinants. Hum. Biol. 73, 271–290. (10.1353/hub.2001.0029) PubMed DOI
James-Todd T, Tehranifar P, Rich-Edwards J, Titievsky L, Terry MB. 2010. The impact of socioeconomic status across early life on age at menarche among a racially diverse population of girls. Ann. Epidemiol. 20, 836–842. (10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.006) PubMed DOI PMC
1989. European longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood (ELSPAC). Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 3, 460–469. (10.1111/j.1365-3016.1989.tb00533.x) PubMed DOI
Piler P, et al. 2017. Cohort profile: the European longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood (ELSPAC) in the Czech Republic. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, dyw091 (10.1093/ije/dyw091) PubMed DOI PMC
Eurostat. 2018 Glossary: equivalised income Statistics explained. Luxembourg: European Commission. See https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Equivalised_income (accessed 3 April 2019).
Bobak M, Marmot M. 1996. East-West mortality divide and its potential explanations: proposed research agenda. BMJ 312, 421–425. (10.1136/bmj.312.7028.421) PubMed DOI PMC
Teilmann G, Pedersen CB, Skakkebaek NE, Jensen TK. 2006. Increased risk of precocious puberty in internationally adopted children in Denmark. Pediatrics 118, e391–e399. (10.1542/peds.2005-2939) PubMed DOI
Pesonen A-K, Räikkönen K, Heinonen K, Kajantie E, Forsén T, Eriksson JG. 2008. Reproductive traits following a parent-child separation trauma during childhood: a natural experiment during World War II. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 20, 345–351. (10.1002/ajhb.20735) PubMed DOI
Jorm AF, Christensen H, Rodgers B, Jacomb PA, Easteal S. 2004. Association of adverse childhood experiences, age of menarche, and adult reproductive behavior: does the androgen receptor gene play a role? Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 125B, 105–111. (10.1002/ajmg.b.20114) PubMed DOI
Pollet TV. 2007. Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28, 176–185. (10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.10.001) DOI
figshare
10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4513274