Presbyopic lens exchange (PRELEX) cataract surgery outcomes with implantation of a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens: femtosecond laser-assisted versus manual phacoemulsification
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
RYC-2016-20471
Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España
PubMed
31168677
DOI
10.1007/s10792-019-01135-3
PII: 10.1007/s10792-019-01135-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Clear lens extraction, Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, Multifocal intraocular lens, Phacoemulsification, Presbyopia, Refractive lens extraction, Rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens,
- MeSH
- citlivost na kontrast MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fakoemulzifikace * metody MeSH
- implantace nitrooční čočky * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- multifokální intraokulární čočky * MeSH
- refrakce oka * MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- zraková ostrost MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes obtained with the implantation of a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal IOL after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional lens extraction (CLE). METHODS: A total of 78 eyes of 58 patients that had undergone conventional phacoemulsification (36 eyes, CLE group) or FLACS (37 eyes, FLACS group) with the implantation of the toric multifocal IOL LU-313 MF30T (Oculentis, Germany) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Mean age was 57.0 years at the time of surgery, ranging from 44 to 69 years. Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. Likewise, contrast sensitivity was assessed at the end of the follow-up. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed in both groups in uncorrected distance (UDVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA) at 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.001). Differences between groups in these parameters as well as in sphere and cylinder did not reach statistical significance during the whole follow-up (p ≥ 0.079), except for UNVA only at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.018). Concerning corrected near visual acuity, only significant differences between groups were found preoperatively (p = 0.020). Furthermore, only a minimal but significant difference between groups was found at 12 months postoperatively in contrast sensitivity for the spatial frequency of 18 cycles/° (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The rotationally asymmetric toric multifocal IOL LU-313 MF 30T provides good visual rehabilitation for near and distance vision after presbyopic lens extraction in eyes with preexisting astigmatism, independently whether the cataract surgery is performed with the FLACS or conventional technique.
Department of Physiology Jessenius Faculty of Medicine Comenius University Martin Slovakia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Aug;41(8):1623-30 PubMed
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 25;2018:8285637 PubMed
J Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;28(12):859-64 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1657-63 PubMed
Am J Ophthalmol. 1967 Jul;64(1):23-35 PubMed
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Aug;43(8):998-1005 PubMed
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar 30;10:555-63 PubMed
Eye Vis (Lond). 2014 Dec 10;1:10 PubMed
J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):584-8 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov;37(11):2043-52 PubMed
Ophthalmology. 2013 May;120(5):942-8 PubMed
J Refract Surg. 2012 Feb;28(2):93-9 PubMed
Surv Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(2):103-31 PubMed
Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct;123(10):2113-26 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):441-5 PubMed
J Refract Surg. 2018 Aug 1;34(8):507-514 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1477-84 PubMed
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;29(1):54-60 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1777-83 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jun;39(6):859-66 PubMed
J Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;28(9):609-13 PubMed
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):1528-1533 PubMed
J Refract Surg. 2012 Apr;28(4):259-63 PubMed
J Refract Surg. 2012 Apr;28(4):253-8 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Feb;42(2):310-28 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;39(9):1307-13 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):585-93 PubMed
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb;37(2):241-50 PubMed
Eye (Lond). 2008 May;22(5):613-9 PubMed
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 21;11(3):e0152088 PubMed
J Refract Surg. 2016 Aug 1;32(8):526-32 PubMed