A large European, multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem, validační studie
PubMed
31255394
DOI
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.05.006
PII: S0924-977X(19)30254-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Avolition, BNSS, Functional outcome, Negative symptoms, PANSS-negative subscale,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- psychiatrické posuzovací škály * MeSH
- schizofrenie (psychologie) MeSH
- schizofrenie diagnóza MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
Negative symptoms represent an unmet need of treatment in schizophrenia. Although a consensus exists on negative symptom construct, and second generation assessment instruments reflecting the consensus are available, studies still rely upon old assessment instruments, that do not reflect recent conceptualizations and might limit progress in the search for effective treatments. This is often the case in the European context, where one of the challenges encountered in designing large studies is the availability of validated instruments in the many languages of the continent. To address this challenge and promote sound research on negative symptoms in Europe, the ECNP Schizophrenia Network coordinated a large multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). Clinically-stable subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ, N = 249) were recruited from 10 European Countries. Apart from BNSS, subjects were administered the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and standardized instruments for depression, extrapyramidal symptoms and psychosocial functioning. Results showed an excellent internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of BNSS and replicated a 5 factor-model. A larger number of subjects with predominant negative symptoms, i.e. the target population for clinical trials, was identified by using the BNSS compared to the PANSS. Regression analysis showed that BNSS-avolition, a key negative symptom poorly assessed by PANSS, explained 23.9% of psychosocial functioning, while no combination of the PANSS core negative symptoms showed the same impact on functioning. The study demonstrated that BNSS has substantial advantages with respect to PANSS for the identification of the avolition domain and subjects with predominant negative symptoms.
6th Psychiatric Department Otto Wagner Spital Vienna Austria
Adult Psychiatry Division Department of Psychiatry University of Geneva Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
Department of Adult Psychiatry Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poznan Poland
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Psychiatric Research Unit Psychiatry Region Zealand Hillerød Denmark
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org