Heterogeneity of Bile Duct Management in the Development of Ischemic Cholangiopathy After Liver Transplantation: Results of a European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association Survey
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article
PubMed
31301856
DOI
10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.018
PII: S0041-1345(19)30203-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cholangitis etiology MeSH
- Ischemia etiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Tissue and Organ Harvesting adverse effects methods MeSH
- Perfusion adverse effects methods MeSH
- Postoperative Complications etiology MeSH
- Graft Survival MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Reperfusion adverse effects methods MeSH
- Liver Transplantation adverse effects MeSH
- Organ Preservation adverse effects methods MeSH
- Bile Ducts blood supply transplantation MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Evaluation Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
BACKGROUND: Surgical factors and direct cytotoxicity of bile salts on cholangiocytes may play a role in the development of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) after liver transplantation (LTx). There is no validated consensus on how to protect the bile ducts during procurement, static preservation, and LTx. Meanwhile, IC remains the most troublesome complication after LTx. AIM: To characterize bile duct management techniques during the LTx process among European transplant centers in cases of donation after brain death (DBD) and circulatory death (DCD). METHOD: An European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association-European Liver Transplant Registry web survey designed to conceal respondents' personal information was sent to surgeons procuring and/or transplanting livers in Europe. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of responses came from large transplant centers (>50 procurements/y). In 8% of DBDs and 14% of DCDs the bile duct is not rinsed. In 46% of DBDs and 52% of DCDs surgeons prefer to remove the gallbladder after graft reperfusion. Protocols concerning preservation solutions (nature, pressure, volume) are extremely heterogeneous. In 54% of DBDs and 61% of DCDs an arterial back table pressure perfusion is performed. Steroids (20%-10%), heparin (72%-60%), prostacyclin (3%-7%), and fibrinolytics (4%-11%) are used as donor-protective interventions in DBD and DCD cases, respectively. In 2% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases a hepatic artery reperfusion is performed first. In 4% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases, fibrinolytics are administered through the hepatic artery during the bench and/or implantation. CONCLUSION: This European web survey shows for the first time the heterogeneity in the management of bile ducts during procurement, preservation, and transplantation in Europe. In the context of sharing more marginal liver grafts, an expert meeting must be organized to formulate guidelines to be applied to protect liver grafts against IC.
APHP Hospital Paul Brousse Inserm U985 University Paris Sud Paris France
Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery University Hospitals Leuven KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
Division of Transplantation Department of Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Liver Unit University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom
References provided by Crossref.org