• This record comes from PubMed

Optimization and validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction protocol for the diagnosis of human brucellosis

. 2020 Apr ; 65 (2) : 353-361. [epub] 20190731

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article

Grant support
4759 Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Research Foundation

Links

PubMed 31368088
DOI 10.1007/s12223-019-00731-1
PII: 10.1007/s12223-019-00731-1
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Due to limitations in commercial diagnostic methods, this study aimed to develop a reliable real-time polymerase chain reaction (Rt-PCR) assay for early diagnosis of brucellosis. Optimization of the Rt-PCR method was performed on serum samples spiked by Brucella melitensis with different densities ranging from 101 to 108 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL; each density was prepared in ten samples. The limit of detection was investigated by using Thermo DNA extraction kit with Maxima SYBR Green Rt-PCR and two TaqMan probe-based Rt-PCR protocols performed by QuantiTect and TEMPase multiplex PCR master mixes in two thermal cyclers, which were Rotor-Gene and Bio-Rad. The validation of the optimized protocol was carried on 20 brucellosis-negative samples and 20 samples spiked with B. melitensis by using a combination of Thermo DNA extraction kit with TEMPase PCR master mix. SYBR Green Rt-PCR yielded positive results on all samples having ≥ 104 cfu/mL of B. melitensis in both thermal cyclers. Its limit of detection was 112 DNA copies per reaction. The positivity of both probe-based Rt-PCR protocols was 100% and 80% on the samples having 103 cfu/mL and 102 cfu/mL of B. melitensis, respectively. The limit of detection of probe-based protocols was defined as 4 DNA copies per reaction. The optimized Rt-PCR protocol showed high-level accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity, each having a rate of 100%. The current study indicated that the TaqMan probe-based Rt-PCR protocol optimized and validated with serum samples can be reliably used for early diagnosis of brucellosis.

See more in PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Mar;42(3):1290-3 PubMed

Adv Biomed Res. 2014 Feb 28;3:85 PubMed

Iran J Pathol. 2016 Spring;11(2):144-50 PubMed

Indian J Med Res. 2016 May;143(5):652-8 PubMed

J Appl Microbiol. 2018 Sep;125(3):646-654 PubMed

Mikrobiyol Bul. 2018 Apr;52(2):135-146 PubMed

J Infect Public Health. 2019 May - Jun;12(3):337-342 PubMed

J Clin Virol. 2014 May;60(1):11-5 PubMed

Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015 Aug;15(8):468-72 PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Sep;11(9):713-8 PubMed

Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008 Feb;15(2):293-6 PubMed

Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9306564 PubMed

AMB Express. 2017 Sep 19;7(1):179 PubMed

BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 24;17(1):230 PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Dec;14(12):1128-34 PubMed

J Clin Virol. 2007 Oct;40(2):93-8 PubMed

J Infect Public Health. 2018 Jul - Aug;11(4):514-520 PubMed

Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul;23(3):550-76 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jan;46(1):385-7 PubMed

BMC Vet Res. 2009 Jul 14;5:22 PubMed

Vet Microbiol. 2009 May 28;137(1-2):156-64 PubMed

Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Jun;469:1-9 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Dec;52(12):4239-43 PubMed

J Clin Lab Anal. 2009;23(3):145-51 PubMed

BMC Res Notes. 2018 Nov 8;11(1):803 PubMed

Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jan 15;40(2):260-4 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Aug;69(8):4753-9 PubMed

J Lab Physicians. 2010 Jul;2(2):55-60 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Mar 26;56(4): PubMed

Braz J Microbiol. 2014 Aug 29;45(2):533-8 PubMed

Electron Physician. 2016 Nov 25;8(11):3222-3227 PubMed

Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 14;3(2): PubMed

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Apr;81(4):227-33 PubMed

Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014 Aug 01;13:31 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2019 Mar 2;292:39-47 PubMed

BMC Res Notes. 2012 Dec 03;5:668 PubMed

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(9):e0062 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...