One of the most fundamental, although controversial, questions related to the evolution of plant mating systems is the distribution of outcrossing rates. Self-compatibility, and especially autonomous self-pollination, can become particularly beneficial in anthropogenically degraded habitats with impoverished pollinator assemblages and increased pollen limitation. In a hand-pollination experiment with 46 meadow plants from the Železné hory Mts., Czech Republic, we evaluated the species' ability to adopt different mating systems. For a subset of the species, we also tested seed germination for inbreeding depression. Subsequently, we analysed relationships between the species' mating systems and 12 floral and life-history traits. We found a relatively discrete distribution of the studied species into four groups. Fully and partially self-incompatible species formed the largest group, followed by self-compatible non-selfers and mixed mating species. The germination experiment showed an absence of inbreeding depression in 19 out of 22 examined species. Nectar sugar per flower, nectar sugar per shoot and dichogamy were significant associated with the mating system. Spontaneous selfing ability and self-incompatibility in species of the meadow communities had a discrete distribution, conforming to the general distribution of mating and breeding systems in angiosperms. The low frequency of spontaneous selfers and the lack of inbreeding depression at germination suggest the existence of a selection against selfing at the later ontogenetic stages. Some floral traits, such as the level of dichogamy and amount of nectar reward, may strongly impact the balance between selfing and outcrossing rates in the self-compatible species and thus shape the evolution of mating systems.

Biology Centre Institute of Entomology The Czech Academy of Sciences České Budějovice Czech Republic

Department of Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University Praha Czech Republic

Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czech Republic

Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Třeboň Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Anderson M., Gorley R.N., Clarke R.K. (2008) Permanova+ for primer: guide to software and statisticl methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK.

Angeloni F., Ouborg N.J., Leimu R. (2011) Metaanalysis on the association of population size and life history with inbreeding depression in plants. Biological Conservation, 144, 35-43.

Barrett S.C.H. (2002) Evolution of sex: the evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 274-284.

Barrett S.C.H. (2003) Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 991-1004.

Barrett S.C. (2015) Influences of clonality on plant sexual reproduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 8859-8866.

Barrett S.C.H., Eckert C.G. (1990) Current issues in plant reproductive ecology. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 39, 5-12.

Baskin J., Baskin C. (2015) Inbreeding depression and the cost of inbreeding on seed germination. Seed Science Research, 25, 355-385.

Bertin R.I., Newman C.M. (1993) Dichogamy in angiosperms. The Botanical Review, 59, 112-152.

Blomberg S.P., Garland T., Ives A.R. (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717-745.

Brys R., Geens B., Beeckman T., Jacquemyn H. (2013) Differences in dichogamy and herkogamy contribute to higher selfing in contrasting environments in the annual Blackstonia perfoliata (Gentianaceae). Annals of Botany, 111, 651-661.

Byers D.L., Waller D.M. (1999) Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 479-513.

Campbell D.R., Forster M., Bischoff M. (2014) Selection of trait combinations through bee and fly visitation to flowers of Polemonium foliosissimum. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27, 325-336.

Chapurlat E., Ågren J., Sletvold N. (2015) Spatial variation in pollinator-mediated selection on phenology, floral display and spur length in the orchid Gymnadenia conopsea. New Phytologist, 208, 1264-1275.

Charlesworth D. (2006) Evolution of plant breeding systems. Current Biology, 16, R726-R735.

Chen L., Stace H.M., James S.H. (1997) Self-incompatibility, seed abortion and clonality in the breeding systems of several Western Australian Drosera species (Droseraceae). Australian Journal of Botany, 45, 191-201.

Clark P.J., Evans F.C. (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology, 35, 445-453.

Cramer H. (1946) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, p 575.

Darwin C. (1876) The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. J. Murray, London, UK, p 486.

Devaux C., Lepers C., Porcher E. (2014) Constraints imposed by pollinator behaviour on the ecology and evolution of plant mating systems. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27, 1413-1430.

Durka W., Michalski S.G. (2012) Daphne: a dated phylogeny of a large European flora for phylogenetically informed ecological analyses. Ecology, 93, 2297-2297.

Eckert C.G. (2000) Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a mass-flowering, clonal plant. Ecology, 81, 532-542.

Eckert C.G., Kalisz S., Geber M.A., Sargent R., Elle E., Cheptou P.O., Goodwillie C., Johnston M.O., Kelly J.K., Moeller D.A., Porcher E., Ree R.H., Vallejo-Marín M., Winn A.A. (2010) Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 35-43.

Faegri K., van der Pijl L. (1979) The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, p 256.

Fisogni A., Cristofolini G., Rossi M., Galloni M. (2011) Pollinator directionality as a response to nectar gradient: promoting outcrossing while avoiding geitonogamy. Plant Biology, 13, 848-856.

Fryxell P.A. (1957) Mode of reproduction of higher plants. The Botanical Review, 23, 135-233.

Glémin S., Ronfort J. (2013) Adaptation and maladaptation in selfing and outcrossing species: new mutations versus standing variation. Evolution, 67, 225-240.

Goldberg E.E., Kohn J.R., Lande R., Robertson K.A., Smith S.A., Igić B. (2010) Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science, 330, 493-495.

Goodwillie C., Kalisz S., Eckert C.G. (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 47-79.

Goodwillie C., Sargent R.D., Eckert C.G., Elle E., Geber M.A., Johnston M.O., Kalisz S., Moeller D.A., Ree R.H., Vallejo-Marin M., Winn A.A. (2010) Correlated evolution of mating system and floral display traits in flowering plants and its implications for the distribution of mating system variation. New Phytologist, 185, 311-321.

Haddadchi A., Fatemi M. (2015) Self-compatibility and floral traits adapted for self-pollination allow homostylous Nymphoides geminata (Menyanthaceae) to persist in marginal habitats. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 301, 239-250.

Harper J.L. (1957) Biological Flora of the British Isles: Ranunculus acris L. (Ranunculus acer auct. plur.). Journal of Ecology, 45, 289-314.

Holsinger K.E. (1991) Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. The American Naturalist, 138, 606-622.

Hörandl E. (2008) Evolutionary implications of self-compatibility and reproductive fitness in the apomictic Ranunculus auricomus polyploid complex (Ranunculaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 169, 1219-1228.

Hu Y., Barrett S.C.H., Zhang D.Y., Liao W.J. (2015) Experimental analysis of mating patterns in a clonal plant reveals contrasting modes of self-pollination. Ecology and Evolution, 5, 5423-5431.

Husband B.C., Schemske D.W. (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution, 50, 54-70.

Jersakova J., Johnson S.D. (2006) Lack of floral nectar reduces self-pollination in a fly-pollinated orchid. Oecologia, 147, 60-68.

Johnson S.D., Peter C.I., Agren J. (2004) The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B: Biological Sciences, 271, 803-809.

de Jong T.J., Waser N.M., Klinkhamer P.G.L. (1993) Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 321-325.

Kalisz S., Vogler D.W. (2003) Benefits of autonomous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments. Ecology, 84, 2928-2942.

Kalisz S., Vogler D.W., Hanley K.M. (2004) Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature, 430, 884-887.

Karrenberg S., Jensen K. (2012) Effects of pollination and pollen source on the seed set of Pedicularis palustris. Folia Geobotanica, 35, 191-202.

Karron J.D., Jackson R.T., Thumser N.N., Schlicht S.L. (1997) Outcrossing rates of individual Mimulus ringens genets are correlated with anther-stigma separation. Heredity, 79, 365-370.

Karron J.D., Ivey C.T., Mitchell R.J., Whitehead M.R., Peakall R., Case A.L. (2012) New perspectives on the evolution of plant mating systems. Annals of Botany, 109, 493-503.

Kearns C.A., Inouye D.W., Waser N.M. (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 83-112.

Klimešová J., Danihelka J., Chrtek J., de Bello F., Herben T. (2017) CLO-PLA: a database of clonal and bud bank traits of Central European flora. Ecology, 98, 1179.

Klinkhamer P.G., de Jong T.J. (1993) Attractiveness to pollinators: a plant's dilemma. Oikos, 66, 180-184.

Klotz S., Kühn I., Durka W. (2002) BIOFLOR - a database on biological and ecological traits of vascular plants in Germany. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde, 38, 1-334.

Lande R., Schemske D.W. (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution, 39, 24-40.

Lepers C., Dufay M., Billiard S. (2014) How does pollination mutualism affect the evolution of prior self-fertilization? A model. Evolution, 68, 3581-3598.

Lloyd D.G., Schoen D.J. (1992) Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 153, 358-369.

Matallana G., Godinho M.A.S., Guilherme F.A.G., Belisario M., Coser T.S., Wendt T. (2010) Breeding systems of Bromeliaceae species: evolution of selfing in the context of sympatric occurrence. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 289, 57-65.

Morrant D.S., Schumann R., Petit S. (2008) Field methods for sampling and storing nectar from flowers with low nectar volumes. Annals of Botany, 103, 533-542.

Motten A.F., Stone J.L. (2000) Heritability of stigma position and the effect of stigma-anther separation on outcrossing in a predominantly self-fertilizing weed, Datura stramonium (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany, 87, 339-347.

Munoz F., Violle C., Cheptou P.-O. (2016) CSR ecological strategies and plant mating systems: outcrossing increases with competitiveness but stress-tolerance is related to mixed mating. Oikos, 125, 1296-1303.

Pagel M. (1999) The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Systematic Biology, 48, 612-622.

Pappers S.M., de Jong T.J., Klinkhamer P.G., Meelis E. (1999) Effects of nectar content on the number of bumblebee approaches and the length of visitation sequences in Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Oikos, 87, 580-586.

Raduski A.R., Haney E.B., Igić B. (2012) The expression of self-incompatibility in angiosperms is bimodal. Evolution, 66, 1275-1283.

Richards C.M. (2000) Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. The American Naturalist, 155, 383-394.

Richards A.J. (2003) Apomixis in flowering plants: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 1085-1093.

Roldán-Serrano A.S., Guerra-Sanz J.M. (2005) Reward attractions of zucchini flowers (Cucurbita pepo L.) to bumblebees (Bombus terrestris L.). European Journal of Horticultural Science, 70, 23-28.

Sargent R.D., Goodwillie C., Kalisz S., Ree R.H. (2007) Phylogenetic evidence for a flower size and number trade-off. American Journal of Botany, 94, 2059-2062.

Sletvold N., Ågren J. (2011) Nonadditive effects of floral display and spur length on reproductive success in a deceptive orchid. Ecology, 92, 2167-2174.

Stebbins G.L. (1957) Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. The American Naturalist, 91, 337-354.

Thomann M., Imbert E., Devaux C., Cheptou P.O. (2013) Flowering plants under global pollinator decline. Trends in Plant Science, 18, 353-359.

Vogler D.W., Kalisz S. (2001) Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution, 55, 202-204.

Voillemot M., Pannell J.R. (2017) Inbreeding depression is high in a self-incompatible perennial herb population but absent in a self-compatible population showing mixed mating. Ecology and Evolution, 7, 8535-8544.

Winn A.A., Elle E., Kalisz S., Cheptou P., Eckert C.G., Goodwillie C., Johnston M.O., Moeller D.A., Ree R.H., Sargent R.D., Vallejo-Marín M. (2011) Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating. Evolution: International Journal of Organic. Evolution, 65, 3339-3359.

Wright S.I., Kalisz S., Slotte T. (2013) Evolutionary consequences of self-fertilization in plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20130133.

Elevational and seasonal patterns of butterflies and hawkmoths in plant-pollinator networks in tropical rainforests of Mount Cameroon

Are Reproductive Traits Related to Pollen Limitation in Plants? A Case Study from a Central European Meadow