• This record comes from PubMed

Are Reproductive Traits Related to Pollen Limitation in Plants? A Case Study from a Central European Meadow

. 2020 May 19 ; 9 (5) : . [epub] 20200519

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Switzerland Media electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
RVO 67985939 Akademie Věd České Republiky
16-12243S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
20-16499S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
PRIMUS/17/SCI/8 Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
UNCE204069 Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova

The deficiency of pollen grains for ovule fertilization can be the main factor limiting plant reproduction and fitness. Because of the ongoing global changes, such as biodiversity loss and landscape fragmentation, a better knowledge of the prevalence and predictability of pollen limitation is challenging within current ecological research. In our study we used pollen supplementation to evaluate pollen limitation (at the level of seed number and weight) in 22 plant species growing in a wet semi-natural meadow. We investigated the correlation between the pollen limitation index (PL) and floral traits associated with plant reproduction or pollinator foraging behavior. We recorded significant pollen limitation for approximately 41% of species (9 out of 22 surveyed). Seven species had a significant positive response in seed production and two species increased in seed weight after pollen supplementation. Considering traits, PL significantly decreased with the number of pollinator functional groups. The relationship of PL with other examined traits was not supported by our results. The causes of pollen limitation may vary among species with regard to (1) different reproductive strategies and life history, and/or (2) temporary changes in influence of biotic and abiotic factors at a site.

See more in PubMed

Ashman T.-L., Knight T.M., Steets J.A., Amarasekare P., Burd M., Campbell D.R., Dudash M.R., Johnston M.O., Mazer S.J., Mitchell R.J., et al. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology. 2004;85:2408–2421. doi: 10.1890/03-8024. DOI

Potts S.G., Biesmeijer J.C., Kremen C., Neumann P., Schweiger O., Kunin W.E. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010;25:345–353. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007. PubMed DOI

Burkle L.A., Marlin J.C., Knight T.M. Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: Loss of species, co-occurrence, and function. Science. 2013;339:1611–1615. doi: 10.1126/science.1232728. PubMed DOI

Alonso C., Vamosi J.C., Knight T.M., Steets J.A., Ashman T.L. Is reproduction of endemic plant species particularly pollen limited in biodiversity hotspots? Oikos. 2010;119:1192–1200. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18026.x. DOI

Castro S., Dostálek T., van der Meer S., Oostermeijer G., Münzbergová Z. Does pollen limitation affect population growth of the endangered Dracocephalum austriacum L.? Popul. Ecol. 2015;57:105–116. doi: 10.1007/s10144-014-0458-x. DOI

Janečková P., Janeček Š., Bartoš M., Hrázský Z. Reproductive system of the critically endangered taxon Gentianella praecox subsp. bohemica. Preslia. 2019;91:77–92. doi: 10.23855/preslia.2019.077. DOI

Haig D., Westoby M. On limits to seed production. Am. Nat. 1988;131:757–759. doi: 10.1086/284817. DOI

Charnov E.L. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ, USA: 1982.

Wilson P., Thomson J.D., Stanton M.L., Rigney L.P. Beyond floral Batemania: Gender biases in selection for pollination success. Am. Nat. 1994;143:283–296. doi: 10.1086/285604. DOI

Burd M. Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction: The role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot. Rev. 1994;60:83–139. doi: 10.1007/BF02856594. DOI

Larson B.M., Barrett S.C. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2000;69:503–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01221.x. DOI

Knight T.M., Steets J.A., Vamosi J.C., Mazer S.J., Burd M., Campbell D.R., Dudash M.R., Johnston M.O., Mitchell R.J., Ashman T.L. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Pattern and process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005;36:467–497. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.115320. DOI

Bennett J.M., Thompson A., Goia I., Feldmann R., Ştefan V., Bogdan A., Rakosy D., Beloiu M., Biro I.-B., Bluemel S., et al. A review of European studies on pollination networks and pollen limitation, and a case study designed to fill in a gap. AoB Plants. 2018;10:ply068. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/ply068. PubMed DOI PMC

Knight T.M., Steets J.A., Ashman T.L. A quantitative synthesis of pollen supplementation experiments highlights the contribution of resource reallocation to estimates of pollen limitation. Am. J. Bot. 2006;93:271–277. doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.2.271. PubMed DOI

Huang Q., Burd M., Fan Z. Resource allocation and seed size selection in perennial plants under pollen limitation. Am. Nat. 2017;190:430–441. doi: 10.1086/692543. PubMed DOI

Vamosi J.C., Knight T.M., Steets J.A., Mazer S.J., Burd M., Ashman T.L. Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:956–961. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507165103. PubMed DOI PMC

García-Camacho R., Totland Ø. Pollen limitation in the alpine: A meta-analysis. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 2009;41:103–111. doi: 10.1657/1523-0430-41.1.103. DOI

Lázaro A., Lundgren R., Totland Ø. Pollen limitation, species’ floral traits and pollinator visitation: Different relationships in contrasting communities. Oikos. 2015;124:174–186. doi: 10.1111/oik.01525. DOI

Brys R., Geens B., Beeckman T., Jacquemyn H. Differences in dichogamy and herkogamy contribute to higher selfing in contrasting environments in the annual Blackstonia perfoliata (Gentianaceae) Ann. Bot. 2013;111:651–661. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct031. PubMed DOI PMC

Vallejo-Marín M., O’Brien H.E. Correlated evolution of self-incompatibility and clonal reproduction in Solanum (Solanaceae) New Phytol. 2007;173:415–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01924.x. PubMed DOI

Hegland J.S., Totland Ø. Is the magnitude of pollen limitation in a plant community affected by pollinator visitation and plant species specialisation levels? Oikos. 2008;117:883–891. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16561.x. DOI

Burd M. The Haig-Westoby model revisited. Am. Nat. 2008;171:400–404. doi: 10.1086/527499. PubMed DOI

Thomson J.D. Using pollination deficits to infer pollinator declines: Can theory guide us? Conserv. Ecol. 2001;5:6. doi: 10.5751/ES-00270-050106. DOI

Wolowski M., Ashman T.L., Freitas L. Community-wide assessment of pollen limitation in hummingbird-pollinated plants of a tropical montane rain forest. Ann. Bot. 2013;112:903–910. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct140. PubMed DOI PMC

Motten A.F. Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecol. Monogr. 1986;56:21–42. doi: 10.2307/2937269. DOI

González A.V., Pérez F. Pollen limitation and reproductive assurance in the flora of the coastal Atacama Desert. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2010;171:607–614. doi: 10.1086/653135. DOI

Auger P. Information Sources in Grey Literature. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG; Berlin, Germany: 2017.

Steffan-Dewenter I., Westphal C. The interplay of pollinator diversity, pollination services and landscape change. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008;45:737–741. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01483.x. DOI

Viana B.F., Boscolo D., Mariano Neto E., Lopes L.E., Lopes A.V., Ferreira P.A., Pigozzo C.M., Primo L.M. How well do we understand landscape effects on pollinators and pollination services? J. Pollinat. Ecol. 2012;7:31–41. doi: 10.26786/1920-7603(2012)2. DOI

Ågren J., Fortunel C., Ehrlén J. Selection on floral display in insect-pollinated Primula farinosa: Effects of vegetation height and litter accumulation. Oecologia. 2006;150:225–232. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0509-x. PubMed DOI

Aizen M.A., Harder L.D. Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: Effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology. 2007;88:271–281. doi: 10.1890/06-1017. PubMed DOI

Zimmerman M., Pyke G.H. Reproduction in Polemonium: Assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am. Nat. 1988;131:723–738. doi: 10.1086/284815. DOI

Wesselingh R.A. Pollen limitation meets resource allocation: Towards a comprehensive methodology. New Phytol. 2007;174:26–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01997.x. PubMed DOI

Schaeffler I., Balao F., Dötterl S. Floral and vegetative cues in oil-secreting and non-oil-secreting Lysimachia species. Ann. Bot. 2012;110:125–138. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs101. PubMed DOI PMC

Jersáková J., Johnson S.D., Kindlmann P. Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids. Biol. Rev. 2006;81:219–235. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006986. PubMed DOI

Schemske D.W., Willson M.F., Melampy M.N., Miller L.J., Verner L., Schemske K.M., Best L.B. Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology. 1978;59:351–366. doi: 10.2307/1936379. DOI

Wolowski M., Ashman T.L., Freitas L. Meta-analysis of pollen limitation reveals the relevance of pollination generalization in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089498. PubMed DOI PMC

Rodger J.G., Ellis A.G. Distinct effects of pollinator dependence and self-incompatibility on pollen limitation in South African biodiversity hotspots. Biol. Lett. 2016;12:20160253. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0253. PubMed DOI PMC

Gómez J.M., Abdelaziz M., Lorite J., Jesús Muñoz-Pajares A., Perfectti F. Changes in pollinator fauna cause spatial variation in pollen limitation. J. Ecol. 2010;98:1243–1252. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01691.x. DOI

Young H.J. Differential importance of beetle species pollinating Dieffenbachia longispatha (Araceae) Ecology. 1988;69:832–844. doi: 10.2307/1941033. DOI

Morris W.F., Vázquez D.P., Chacoff N.P. Benefit and cost curves for typical pollination mutualisms. Ecology. 2010;91:1276–1285. doi: 10.1890/08-2278.1. PubMed DOI

Moravec J., Balaťová-Tuláčková E., Blažková D., Hadač E., Hejný S., Husák Š., Jenıík J., Kolbek J., Krahulec F., Kropáč Z., et al. Rostlinná společenstva České republiky a jejich ohrožení [Red list of plant communities of the Czech Republic and their endangerment]. Ed. 2. Severočes. Přír. Suppl. 1995;28:1–206.

Bartoš M., Janeček Š., Janečková P., Padyšáková E., Tropek R., Götzenberger L., Klomberg Y., Jersáková J. Self-compatibility and autonomous selfing of plants in meadow communities. Plant Biol. 2020;22:120–128. doi: 10.1111/plb.13049. PubMed DOI

Klotz S., Kühn I., Durka W. BIOFLOR—A database on biological and ecological traits of vascular plants in Germany. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde. 2002;38:1–334.

Klimešová J., Danihelka J., Chrtek J., de Bello F., Herben T. CLO-PLA: A database of clonal and bud bank traits of Central European flora. Ecology. 2017;98:1179. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1745. PubMed DOI

Morrant D.S., Schumann R., Petit S. Field methods for sampling and storing nectar from flowers with low nectar volumes. Ann. Bot. 2009;103:533–542. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn241. PubMed DOI PMC

Anderson M.J., Gorley R.N., Clarke K.R. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. PRIMER-E; Plymouth, UK: 2008.

Baskin J.M., Baskin C.C. Pollen limitation and its effect on seed germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2018;28:253–260. doi: 10.1017/S0960258518000272. DOI

Young H.J., Young T.P. Alternative outcomes of natural and experimental high pollen loads. Ecology. 1992;73:639–647. doi: 10.2307/1940770. DOI

Thomson D.M. Effects of long-term variation in pollinator abundance and diversity on reproduction of a generalist plant. J. Ecol. 2019;107:491–502. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13055. DOI

R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2019. Version 3.5.3.

Vamosi J.C., Steets J.A., Ashman T.L. Drivers of pollen limitation: Macroecological interactions between breeding system, rarity, and diversity. Plant. Ecol. Divers. 2013;6:171–180. doi: 10.1080/17550874.2013.769130. DOI

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...