Alternative plant designs: consequences for community assembly and ecosystem functioning
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
31678986
PubMed Central
PMC7442394
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcz180
PII: 5611311
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning, ecological filters, ecophysiology, functional diversity, functional ecology, many-to-one mapping, species coexistence,
- MeSH
- biodiverzita MeSH
- ekosystém * MeSH
- fenotyp MeSH
- fyziologie rostlin MeSH
- rostliny * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Alternative organism designs (i.e. the existence of distinct combinations of traits leading to the same function or performance) are a widespread phenomenon in nature and are considered an important mechanism driving the evolution and maintenance of species trait diversity. However, alternative designs are rarely considered when investigating assembly rules and species effects on ecosystem functioning, assuming that single trait trade-offs linearly affect species fitness and niche differentiation. SCOPE: Here, we first review the concept of alternative designs, and the empirical evidence in plants indicating the importance of the complex effects of multiple traits on fitness. We then discuss how the potential decoupling of single traits from performance and function of species can compromise our ability to detect the mechanisms responsible for species coexistence and the effects of species on ecosystems. Placing traits in the continuum of organism integration level (i.e. traits hierarchically structured ranging from organ-level traits to whole-organism traits) can help in choosing traits more directly related to performance and function. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that alternative designs have important implications for the resulting trait patterning expected from different assembly processes. For instance, when only single trade-offs are considered, environmental filtering is expected to result in decreased functional diversity. Alternatively, it may result in increased functional diversity as an outcome of alternative strategies providing different solutions to local conditions and thus supporting coexistence. Additionally, alternative designs can result in higher stability of ecosystem functioning as species filtering due to environmental changes would not result in directional changes in (effect) trait values. Assessing the combined effects of multiple plant traits and their implications for plant functioning and functions will improve our mechanistic inferences about the functional significance of community trait patterning.
CIDE CSIC Montcada Valencia Spain
Department of Botany Faculty of Sciences University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Adler PB, Salguero-Gómez R, Compagnoni A, et al. . 2014. Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111: 10019–10019. PubMed PMC
Angert AL, Huxman TE, Chesson P, Venable DL. 2009. Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 11641–11645. PubMed PMC
Apgaua DMG, Ishida FY, Tng DYP, et al. . 2015. Functional traits and water transport strategies in lowland tropical rainforest trees. PLoS One 10: e0130799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130799. PubMed PMC
Arnold SJ. 1983. Morphology, performance and fitness. American Zoologist 23: 347–361.
Asbjornsen H, Goldsmith GR, Alvarado-Barrientos MS, et al. . 2011. Ecohydrological advances and applications in plant-water relations research: a review. Journal of Plant Ecology 4: 3–22.
de Bello F, Thuiller W, Lepš J, et al. . 2009. Partitioning of functional diversity reveals the scale and extent of trait convergence and divergence. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 475–486.
de Bello F, Lavorel S, Díaz S, et al. . 2010. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 2873–2893.
Bermúdez R, Retuerto R. 2013. Living the difference: alternative functional designs in five perennial herbs coexisting in a coastal dune environment. Functional Plant Biology 40: 1187–1198. PubMed
Bermúdez R, Retuerto R. 2014. Together but different: co-occurring dune plant species differ in their water- and nitrogen-use strategies. Oecologia 174: 651–663. PubMed
Carmona CP, de Bello F, Mason NWH, Leps J. 2016. Traits without borders: integrating functional diversity across scales. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 31: 382–394. PubMed
Cavender-Bares J, Kitajima K, Bazzaz FA. 2004. Multiple trait associations in relation to habitat differentiation among 17 Floridian oak species. Ecological Monographs 74: 635–662.
Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW. 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecology Letters 12: 693–715. PubMed
Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343–366.
Cornelissen JHC. 1996. An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. Journal of Ecology 84: 573–582.
Cornelissen JHC, Thompson K. 1997. Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. New Phytologist 135: 109–114. PubMed
Cornwell WK, Ackerly DD. 2009. Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecological Monographs 79: 109–126.
Díaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, et al. . 2004. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 295–304.
Díaz S, Kattge J, Cornelissen JHC, et al. . 2016. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529: 167–171. PubMed
Dwyer JM, Laughlin DC. 2017. Constraints on trait combinations explain climatic drivers of biodiversity: the importance of trait covariance in community assembly. Ecology Letters 20: 872–882. PubMed
Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T. 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 802–813. PubMed
Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nystrom M, et al. . 2003. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 488–494.
Falster DS, Westoby M. 2005. Alternative height strategies among 45 dicot rain forest species from tropical Queensland, Australia. Journal of Ecology 93: 521–535.
Fisher JB, Baldocchi DD, Misson L, Dawson TE, Goldstein AH. 2007. What the towers don’t see at night: nocturnal sap flow in trees and shrubs at two AmeriFlux sites in California. Tree Physiology 27: 597–610. PubMed
Freschet GT, Dias ATC, Ackerly DD, et al. . 2011. Global to community scale differences in the prevalence of convergent over divergent leaf trait distributions in plant assemblages. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20: 755–765.
Götzenberger L, de Bello F, Bråthen KA, et al. . 2012. Ecological assembly rules in plant communities – approaches, patterns and prospects. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 87: 111–27. PubMed
HilleRisLambers J, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Levine JM, Mayfield MM. 2012. Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 43: 227–248.
Hortal J, de Bello F, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinsohn TM, Lobo JM, Ladle RJ. 2015. Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 46: 523–549.
Kraft NJB, Adler PB, Godoy O, James EC, Fuller S, Levine JM. 2015a Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor. Functional Ecology 29: 592–599.
Kraft NJB, Godoy O, Levine JM. 2015b Plant functional traits and the multidimensional nature of species coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 112: 797–802. PubMed PMC
Lambers H, Chapin FS III, Pons TL. 2008. Plant physiological ecology. Berlin: Springer.
Laughlin DC, Messier J. 2015. Fitness of multidimensional phenotypes in dynamic adaptive landscapes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30: 487–496. PubMed
Laughlin DC, Joshi C, Richardson SJ, Peltzer DA, Mason NWH, Wardle DA. 2015. Quantifying multimodal trait distributions improves trait-based predictions of species abundances and functional diversity. Journal of Vegetation Science 26: 46–57.
Lavorel S, Garnier E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16: 545–556.
Lewontin RC. 1978. Adaptation. Scientific American 293: 212–228. PubMed
MacArthur R, Levins R. 1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. The American Naturalist 101: 377–385.
Májekova M, De Bello F, Dolezal J, Leps J. 2014. Plant functional traits as determinants of population stability. Ecology 95: 2369–2374.
Marks CO. 2007. The causes of variation in tree seedling traits: the roles of environmental selection versus chance. Evolution 61: 455–469. PubMed
Marks CO, Lechowicz MJ. 2006. Alternative designs and the evolution of functional diversity. The American Naturalist 167: 55–66. PubMed
Mayfield MM, Levine JM. 2010. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecology Letters 13: 1085–93. PubMed
McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 178–85. PubMed
van der Meijden R. 2005. Heukels’ Flora van Nederland. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Messier J, McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Lechowicz MJ. 2017. Trait variation and integration across scales: is the leaf economic spectrum present at local scales? Ecography 40: 685–697.
Meziane D, Shipley B. 2001. Direct and indirect relationships between specific leaf area, leaf nitrogen and leaf gas exchange. Effects of irradiance and nutrient supply. Annals of Botany 88: 915–927.
Moles A, Ackerly DD, Tweddle JC, et al. . 2007. Global patterns in seed size. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 109–116.
Moretti M, Dias ATC, de Bello F, et al. . 2017. Handbook of protocols for standardized measurement of terrestrial invertebrate functional traits. Functional Ecology 31: 558–567.
Naeem S, Wright JP. 2003. Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem. Ecology Letters 6: 567–579.
O’Brien JJ, Oberbauer SF, Clark DB. 2004. Whole tree xylem sap flow responses to multiple environmental variables in a wet tropical forest. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 551–567.
Parker GA, Smith JM. 1990. Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348: 27–33.
Pearson RG, Stanton JC, Shoemaker KT, et al. . 2014. Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change. Nature Climate Change 4: 217–221.
Pistón N, de Bello F, Dias ATC, et al. . 2019. Multidimensional ecological analyses demonstrate how interactions between functional traits shape fitness and life history strategies. Journal of Ecology 107: 2317–2328.
Pivovaroff AL, Pasquini SC, De Guzman ME, Alstad KP, Stemke JS, Santiago LS. 2016. Multiple strategies for drought survival among woody plant species. Functional Ecology 30: 517–526.
Reich PB. 2014. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology 102: 275–301.
Rosado BHP, de Mattos EA. 2010. Interspecific variation of functional traits in a CAM-tree dominated sandy coastal plain. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 43–54.
Rosado BHP, de Mattos EA. 2017. On the relative importance of CSR ecological strategies and integrative traits to explain species dominance at local scales. Functional Ecology 31: 1969–1974.
Rosado BHP, de Mattos EA.. 2018. Data from: On the relative importance of CSR ecological strategies and integrative traits to explain species dominance at local scales, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.h67kv
Rosado BHP, Dias ATC, De Mattos EA. 2013. Going back to basics: importance of ecophysiology when choosing functional traits for studying communities and ecosystems. Natureza & Conservação 11: 1–8.
Rosado BHP, Figueiredo MSL, de Mattos EA, Grelle CEV. 2016. Eltonian shortfall due to the Grinnellian view: functional ecology between the mismatch of niche concepts. Ecography 39: 1034–1041.
Sevanto S, McDowell NG, Dickman LT, Pangle R, Pockman WT. 2014. How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses. Plant, Cell & Environment 37: 153–161. PubMed PMC
Shipley B, de Bello F, Cornelissen JHC, Laliberté E, Laughlin DC, Reich PB. 2016. Reinforcing loose foundation stones in trait-based plant ecology. Oecologia 180: 923–931. PubMed
Shoval O, Sheftel H, Shinar G, et al. . 2013. Evolutionary trade-offs, pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space. Science 339: 757–757. PubMed
Silva JB, Sfair JC, dos Santos ND, Pôrto KC. 2018. Different trait arrangements can blur the significance of ecological drivers of community assembly of mosses from rocky outcrops. Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 238: 43–50.
Stubbs WJ, Wilson BJ. 2004. Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community. Journal of Ecology 92: 557–567.
Suding KN, Lavorel S, Chapin FS, et al. . 2008. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biology 14: 1125–1140.
Valladares F, Skillman JB, Pearcy RW. 2002. Convergence in light capture efficiencies among tropical forest understory plants with contrasting crown architectures: a case of morphological compensation. American Journal of Botany 89: 1275–1284. PubMed
Vellend M. 2010. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 85: 183–206. PubMed
Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, et al. . 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116: 882–892.
Wainwright PC. 2007. Functional versus morphological diversity in macroevolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38: 381–401.
Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J. 1999. Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2: 95–113.
Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk P a., Wright IJ. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 125–159.
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, et al. . 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821–7. PubMed
Wright IJ, Falster DS, Pickup M, Westoby M. 2006. Cross-species patterns in the coordination between leaf and stem traits, and their implications for plant hydraulics. Physiologia Plantarum 127: 445–456.
Wright JP, Sutton-Grier A. 2012. Does the leaf economic spectrum hold within local species pools across varying environmental conditions? Functional Ecology 26: 1390–1398.
Wullschleger SD, Meinzer FC, Vertessy RA. 1988. A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees. Tree Physiology 18: 499–512. PubMed
Yang J, Cao M, Swenson NG. 2018. Why functional traits do not predict tree demographic rates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 33: 326–336. PubMed