Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) Versus Venlafaxine ER In The Treatment Of Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Center Study With Open-Label, Follow-Up
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Nový Zéland Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
31695391
PubMed Central
PMC6815763
DOI
10.2147/ndt.s226577
PII: 226577
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- depression, tDCS, transcranial direct-current stimulation, treatment, venlafaxine ER,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), a relatively new neuromodulation approach, provides some evidence of an antidepressant effect. This randomized, 4-week, double-blind study with 8-week, open-label, follow-up compared the efficacy and tolerability of left anodal tDCS with venlafaxine ER (VNF) in the treatment of depression and prevention of early relapse. METHODS: Subjects (n = 57) received tDCS (2 mA, 20 sessions, 30 mins) plus placebo (n = 29) or VNF plus sham tDCS (n = 28). Responders to both interventions entered the open-label follow-up. The primary outcome was score change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at week 4 of the study. Secondary outcomes were response, remission, dropout rates and relapse rates within the follow-up. UNLABELLED: The mean change in the MADRS score from baseline to week for patients treated with tDCS was 7.69 (95% CI, 5.09-10.29) points and 9.64 (95% CI, 6.20-13.09) points for patients from the VNF group, a nonsignificant difference (1.95, 95% CI -2.25-6.16; t (55) = 0.93, p= 0.36, Cohen´s d = 0.24). There were no significant between-group differences in the MADRS scores from baseline to endpoint (intention-to-treat analysis). The response/remission rate for tDCS (24%/17%) and VNF (43%/32%) as well as the dropout rate (tDCS/VNF; 6/6) did not differ significantly between groups. In the follow-up, relapse (tDCS/VNF; 1/2) and dropout (tDCS/VNF; 2/3) rates were low and comparable. LIMITATIONS: A relatively small sample size and short duration of the antidepressant treatment; no placebo arm. CONCLUSION: Overall, this study found a similar efficacy of tDCS and VNF in the acute treatment of depression and prevention of early relapse. The real clinical usefulness of tDCS and its optimal parameters in the treatment of depression should be further validated.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kessler RC, Bromet EJ. The epidemiology of depression across cultures. PubMed DOI PMC
Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. PubMed DOI
Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. PubMed DOI
Mutz J, Edgcumbe DR, Brunoni AR, Fu CHY. Efficacy and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of adult unipolar and bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised sham-controlled trials. PubMed DOI
Padberg F, Kumpf U, Mansmann U, et al. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as treatment for major depression: study design and methodology of a multicenter triple blind randomized placebo controlled trial (DepressionDC). PubMed DOI
Borrione L, Moffa AH, Martin D, Loo CK, Brunoni AR. Transcranial direct current stimulation in the acute depressive episode: a systematic review of current knowledge. PubMed DOI
Pathak Y, Kopell BH, Szabo A, Rainey C, Harsch H, Butson CR. The role of electrode location and stimulation polarity in patient response to cortical stimulation for major depressive disorder. PubMed DOI PMC
Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Fregni F, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data. PubMed DOI PMC
Meron D, Hedger N, Garner M, Baldwin DS. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability. PubMed DOI
Shiozawa P, Fregni F, Bensenor IM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed DOI
Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Sampaio-Junior B, et al. Trial of electrical direct-current therapy versus escitalopram for depression. PubMed DOI
Brunoni AR, Valiengo L, Baccaro A, et al. The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. PubMed DOI
Rigonatti SP, Boggio PS, Myczkowski ML, et al. Transcranial direct stimulation and fluoxetine for the treatment of depression. PubMed DOI
Martin DM, Alonzo A, Ho KA, et al. Continuation transcranial direct current stimulation for the prevention of relapse in major depression. PubMed DOI
Valiengo L, Bensenor IM, Goulart AC, et al. The sertraline versus electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study (select-TDCS): results of the crossover and follow-up phases. PubMed DOI
APA.
Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. PubMed
Thase ME, Rush AJ. When at first you don’t succeed: sequential strategies for antidepressant nonresponders. PubMed
Sackeim HA. The definition and meaning of treatment-resistant depression. PubMed
Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. PubMed DOI
Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology – Revised (DHEW Publ No ADM 76-338). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; Public Health Service; Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration; NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch; Division of Extramural Research Programs; 1976:218–222.
Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz MS, Rizzerio BG, Fregni F. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. PubMed DOI
Kobak KA, Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Katzelnick DJ. Computer-administered clinical rating scales. A review. PubMed DOI
Beck AT, Rial WY, Rickels K. Short form of depression inventory: cross-validation. PubMed
Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, et al. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. PubMed DOI
Matsumoto H, Ugawa Y. Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: a review. PubMed DOI PMC
Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. PubMed DOI PMC
Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). PubMed DOI
Souery D, Oswald P, Massat I, et al. Clinical factors associated with treatment resistance in major depressive disorder: results from a European multicenter study. PubMed DOI
Bauer M, Severus E, Moller HJ, Young AH, Disorders W. Pharmacological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders: summary of WFSBP guidelines. PubMed DOI
Kennedy SH, Lam RW, McIntyre RS, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: section 3. Pharmacological treatments. PubMed DOI PMC
Benkert O, Grunder G, Wetzel H, Hackett D. A randomized, double-blind comparison of a rapidly escalating dose of venlafaxine and imipramine in inpatients with major depression and melancholia. PubMed DOI
Debonnel G, Saint-Andre E, Hebert C, de MC, Lavoie N, Blier P. Differential physiological effects of a low dose and high doses of venlafaxine in major depression. PubMed DOI
Guelfi JD, White C, Hackett D, Guichoux JY, Magni G. Effectiveness of venlafaxine in patients hospitalized for major depression and melancholia. PubMed
Palm U, Hasan A, Strube W, Padberg F. tDCS for the treatment of depression: a comprehensive review. PubMed DOI
Alonzo A, Aaronson S, Bikson M, et al. Study design and methodology for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for unipolar and bipolar depression. PubMed DOI
Brunoni AR, Sampaio-Junior B, Moffa AH, et al. The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial. PubMed DOI PMC
CADTH. Aripiprazole (Abilify): depression, Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Aripiprazole (Abilify): depression, Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Ottawa (ON). 2016. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121104 Accessed October8, 2019.
Yokoi Y, Sumiyoshi T. Application of transcranial direct current stimulation to psychiatric disorders: trends and perspectives. DOI
D’Urso G, Dell’Osso B, Rossi R, et al. Clinical predictors of acute response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in major depression. PubMed DOI