Despite object categorization being an important ability for the survival of wild animals, the principles behind this ability have been only scarcely studied using wild-ranging, untrained animals. Reiterating our previous study undertaken with wild-ranging titmice on winter feeders (Nováková et al. Behav Process 143:7-12, 2017), we aimed to test two hypotheses of object recognition proposed by animal psychology studies: the particulate feature theory and recognition by components in the methodological paradigm of nest defence. We tested whether the parents of the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) recognize the dummies of the common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus), which is a potential predator of large chicks or fledglings, as a threat in case when their body parts are scrambled. The kestrel dummy was presented with the head at the top, in the middle, and at the bottom of the body. We showed that the shrikes did not consider dummies of a kestrel with an inappropriately placed head as a threat to the nest and attacked it equally scarcely as the harmless control. These results support the theory of recognition by components, presuming that the mutual position of body parts is essential for appropriate recognition of the object. When the body parts were scrambled, most of shrikes were not able to identify the kestrel in such an object despite all local features (eye, beak, colouration, and claws) being present. Nevertheless, shrikes did not consider the scrambled dummies as completely harmless, because they fed their chicks in their presence significantly less often than in the presence of harmless control.

Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Branišovská 1760 37005 České Budějovice Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Aust U, Huber L (2003) Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 31(3):213–224 DOI

Beránková J, Veselý P, Sýkorová J, Fuchs R (2014) The role of key features in predator recognition by untrained birds. Anim Cogn 17:963–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0728-1 PubMed DOI

Beránková J, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2015) The role of body size in predator recognition by untrained birds. Behav Process 120:128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.015 DOI

Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115–147 DOI

Caro TM (2005) Antipredator defences in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, London

Cerella J (1980) The pigeon’s analysis of pictures. Pattern Recogn 12:1–6 DOI

Cook RG, Wright AA, Drachman EE (2013) Categorization of birds, mammals, and chimeras by pigeons. Behav Process 93:98–110 DOI

Curio E (1975) The functional organization of anti-predator behaviour in the pied flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception. Anim Behav 23:1–115 DOI

Davies NB, Welbergen JA (2008) Cuckoo-hawk mimicry? An experimental test. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 275:1817–1822. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0331 DOI

Deppe C, Holt D, Tewksbury J, Broberg L, Petersen J, Wood K (2003) Effect of northern pygmy-owl (Glaucidium gnoma) eyespots on avian mobbing. Auk 120(3):765–771 DOI

Edwards G, Hosking E, Smith S (1950) Reactions of some passerine birds to a stuffed cuckoo. II. A detailed study of the willow-warbler. Br Birds 43:144–150

Gill SA, Neudorf DL, Sealy SG (1997) Host responses to cowbirds near the nest: for recognition. Anim Behav 53:1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0362 PubMed DOI

Goławski A, Mitrus C (2008) What is more important: nest-site concealment or aggressive behaviour? A case study of the red-backed shrike, Lanius collurio. Folia Zool 57(4):403–410

Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (1996) Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 65:465–475 DOI

Korpimäki E (1985) Diet of the kestrel Falco tinnunculus in the breeding season. Ornis Fenn 62:130–137

Krätzig H (1940) Untersuchungen zur Lebensweise des Moorschneehuhns (Lagopus l. lagopus L.) während der Jugendentwicklung. J Ornithol 88:139–165 DOI

Krebs JR, Davies NB (1993) An introduction to behaviour ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

Lefranc N (1997) Shrikes: a guide to the shrikes of the world. A&C Black, London

Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Bülthoff HH, Poggio T (1994) View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Curr Biol 4:401–414 DOI

Martin TE (1993) Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. Am Nat 141:897–913 DOI

Matsukawa A, Inoue S, Jitsumori M (2004) Pigeon’s recognition of cartoons: effects of fragmentation, scrambling, and deletion of elements. Behav Process 65:25–34 DOI

Nácarová J, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2018) Effect of the exploratory behaviour on a bird’s ability to categorize a predator. Behav Process 151:89–95 DOI

Němec M, Fuchs R (2014) Nest defense of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio against five corvid species. Acta Ethol 17(3):149–154 DOI

Němec M, Syrová M, Dokoupilová L, Veselý P, Šmilauer P, Landová E, Fuchs R et al (2015) Surface texture and priming play important roles in predator recognition by the red-backed shrike in field experiments. Anim Cogn 18(1):259–268 DOI

Nice MM, Pelkwyk JT (1941) Enemy recognition by the song sparrow. Auk 58:195–214 DOI

Nováková N, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2017) Object categorization by wild ranging birds—winter feeder experiments. Behav Process 143:7–12 DOI

Patterson TL, Petrinovich L, James DK (1980) Reproductive value and appropriateness of response to predators by white-crowned sparrows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:227–231 DOI

Peissig JJ, Young ME, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (2000) Seeing things from a different angle: the pigeon’s recognition of single geons rotated in depth. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 26(2):115 DOI

Rock I, DiVita J (1987) A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cogn Psychol 19:280–293 DOI

Scaife M (1976) The response to eye-like shapes by birds. I. The effect of context: a predator and a strange bird. Anim Behav 24:195–199 DOI

Šimek J (2001) Patterns of breeding fidelity in the Red-backed Shrike (Lanius collurio). Ornis Fennica 78:61–71

Smith MJ, Graves HB (1978) Some factors influencing mobbing behavior in Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica). Behav Biol 23(3):355–372 DOI

Strnad M, Němec M, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2012) Red-backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) adjust the mobbing intensity, but not mobbing frequency, by assessing the potential threat to themselves from different predators. Ornis Fennica 89:206–215

Strnadová I, Němec M, Strnad M, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2018) The nest defence by the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio—support for the vulnerability hypothesis. J Avian Biol 49(5):jav-01726 DOI

Syrová M (2011) Artificial dummies as stimuli in field mobbing experiments—Bc. Thesis, Faculty of Sciences, The University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Syrová M, Němec M, Veselý P, Landová E, Fuchs R, Moskát C (2016) Facing a clever predator demands clever responses - Red-Backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) vs. Eurasian Magpies (Pica pica). PloS one 11(7):e0159432 DOI

Trnka A, Prokop P (2012) The effectiveness of hawk mimicry in protecting cuckoos from aggressive hosts. Anim Behav 83:263–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.036 DOI

Tryjanowski P, Goławski A (2004) Sex differences in nest defence by the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio: effects of offspring age, brood size, and stage of breeding season. J Ethol 22(1):13–16 DOI

Tvardíková K, Fuchs R (2011) Do birds behave according to dynamic risk assessment theory? A feeder experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:727–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1075-0 DOI

Van Hamme LJ, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (1992) Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 18:387–399 DOI

Veselý P, Buršíková M, Fuchs R (2016) Birds at the winter feeder do not recognize an artificially coloured predator. Ethology 122:937–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12565 DOI

Wacker DW, Coverdill AJ, Bauer CM, Wingfield JC (2009) Male territorial aggression and androgen modulation in high latitude populations of the Sooty, Passerella iliaca sinuosa, and Red Fox Sparrow, Passerella iliaca zaboria. J Ornithol 151:79–86 DOI

Wasserman EA, Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Van Hamme LJ, Biederman I (1993) Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychol Sci 4:336–341 DOI

Watanabe S (2010) Pigeons can discriminate “good” and “bad” paintings by children. Anim Cogn 13(1):75 DOI

Welbergen JA, Davies NB (2011) A parasite in wolf’s clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav Ecol 22:574–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr008 DOI

Red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo-hawk mimicry

Untrained birds' ability to recognise predators with changed body size and colouration in a field experiment