BACKGROUND: During recognition process, multiple parameters of the encountered stimulus may play a role. Previous studies with wild birds identified the importance of several salient features (e.g., eyes, beak, prominent elements of colouration) which birds use to recognise other bird species, such as predators or nest parasites. In the present study, we observed the responses of passerines visiting winter feeders to stimuli in the form of dummies of Eurasian sparrowhawk which were modified in body size and/or colouration but always carried the salient features of raptors (hooked beak, talons) and one species-specific feature of the sparrowhawk (yellow eyes). In the vicinity of a feeder, we placed a dummy of an unmodified sparrowhawk, life-sized sparrowhawk with pigeon, great tit, or robin colouration, a small, great tit-sized sparrowhawk dummy with unmodified or pigeon colouration, or an unmodified pigeon dummy, which functioned as a harmless control. Then we measured how it affected the number of visits. RESULTS: We found that birds were less afraid of small dummies regardless of their colouration than they were of life-sized raptor dummies or even the pigeon dummy. This contrasts with the results of a previous laboratory experiment where great tits' reaction to small dummies was comparably fearful to their response to life-size dummies. In our experiment, birds were also not afraid of life-sized dummies with modified colouration except for a robin-coloured dummy, which caused an equally significant fear reaction as an unmodified sparrowhawk dummy. It is likely that this dummy resembled the colouration of a male sparrowhawk closely enough to cause this effect. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observations, we conclude that birds use contextual features to evaluate the size of other birds. Distance and familiar reference points seem to play an important part in this process.

Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Albertov 6 12800 Praha 2 Czech Republic

Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Branišovská 1760 37005 České Budějovice Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Curio E. The ethology of predation. In: Farner DS, editor. The series zoophysiology and ecology. New York: Springer; 1976. p. 1.

Cohen H, Lefebvre C. Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. 2. Oxford: Elsevier; 2017. p. 34.

Götmark F. Predation by sparrowhawks favours early breeding and small broods in great tits. Oecologia. 2002;130:25–32. PubMed

Lorenz K. The companion in the bird's world. Auk. 1937;54:245–273.

Krätzig H. Untersuchungen zur Lebensweise des Moorschneehuhns (Lagopus l. lagopus L.) während der Jugendentwicklung. J Ornithol. 1940;88:139–165.

Tinbergen N. Social releasers and the experimental method required fortheir study. Wilson Bull. 1948;60:6–51.

Curio E. The functional organization of anti-predator behaviour in the pied flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception. Anim Behav. 1975;23:1–115. PubMed

Smith JM, Graves HB. Some factors influencing mobbing behaviour in barn swallows Hirundo rustica. Behav Biol. 1978;23:355–372.

Gill SA, Neudorf DL, Sealy SG. Host responses to cowbirds near the nest: cues for recognition. Anim Behav. 1997;53:1287–1293. PubMed

Gill SA, Grieef PM, Staib LM, Sealy SG. Does nest defence deter or facilitate cowbird parasitism? A test of the nesting-cue hypothesis. Ethology. 1997;103:56–71.

Edwards G, Hosking E, Smith S. Reactions of some passerine birds to a stuffed cuckoo. II. A detailed study of the Willow Warbler. Br Birds. 1950;43:144–150.

Tvardíková K, Fuchs R. Do birds behave according to dynamic risk assessment theory? A feeder experiment Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65:727–733.

Tvardíková K, Fuchs R. Tits recognize the potential dangers of predators and harmless birds in feeder experiments. J Ethol. 2012;30:157–165.

Strnad M, Němec M, Veselý P, Fuchs R. Red-backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) adjust the mobbing intensity, but not mobbing frequency, by assessing the potential threat to themselves from different predators. Ornis Fennica. 2012;89:206–215.

Veselý P, Buršíková M, Fuchs R. Birds at the winter feeder do not recognize an artificially coloured predator. Ethology. 2016;122:937–944.

Götmark F, Post PG. Prey selection by sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus: relative predation risk for breeding passerine birds in relation to their size, ecology and behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 1996;351:1559–1577.

Chamberlain DE, Glue Chamberalin DE, Toms MP. Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus presence and winter bird abundance. J Ornithol. 2009;150:247–254.

Fuchs R, Veselý P, Nácarová J. Predator recognition in birds: the use of key features. Cham: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12404-5

Scaife M. The response to eye-like shapes by birds. I. The effect of context: a predator and a strange bird. Anim Behav. 1976;24:195–199.

Trnka A, Prokop P, Grim T. Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avianhosts recognize adult brood parasites? PLoS ONE. 2012;7:37445. PubMed PMC

Beránková J, Veselý P, Sýkorová J, Fuchs R. The role of key features in predator recognition by untrained birds. Anim Cogn. 2014;17:963–971. PubMed

Davies NB, Welbergen JA. Cuckoo–hawk mimicry? An experimental test. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 2008;275:1817–1822. PubMed PMC

Swaisgood RR, Owings DH, Rowe MP. Conflict and assessment in a predator–prey system: ground squirrels versus rattlesnakes. Anim Behav. 1999;57:1033–1044. PubMed

Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science. 2005;308:1934–1937. PubMed

Palleroni A, Hauser M, Marler P. Do responses of galliform birds vary adaptively with predator size? Anim Cogn. 2005;8:200–210. PubMed

Beránková J, Veselý P, Fuchs R. The role of body size in predator recognition by untrained birds. Behav Process. 2015;120:128–134. PubMed

Quinn JL, Cole EF, Bates J, Payne RW, Cresswell W. Personality predicts individual responsiveness to the risks of starvation and predation. Proc Royal Soc B. 2012;279:1919–1926. PubMed PMC

Nácarová J, Veselý P, Fuchs R. Effect of the exploratory behaviour on a bird's ability to categorize a predator. Behav Process. 2018;151:89–95. PubMed

Soard CM, Ritchison G. Chick-a-dee calls of Carolina chickadees convey information about degree of threat posed by avian predators. Anim Behav. 2009;78:1447–1453.

Courter JR, Ritchison G. Alarm calls of tufted titmice convey information about predator size and threat. Behav Ecol. 2010;21:936–942.

Klump GM, Curio E. Reactions of blue tits Parus caeruleus to hawk models of different sizes. Bird Behav. 1983;4:78–81.

Evans C, Macedonia J, Marler P. Effects of apparent size and speed on the response of chickens, Gallus-Gallus, to computer-generated simulations of aerial predators. Anim Behav. 1993;46:1–11.

Towe AL. A study of figural equivalence in the pigeon. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954;47:283. PubMed

Jenkins WO, Pascal GR, Walker RW. Deprivation and generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1958;56:274. PubMed

Wildemann DG, Holland JG. The effect of the blackout method on acquisition and gene-ralization. J Exp Enal Behav. 1973;19:73–80. PubMed PMC

Pisacreta R, Potter C, Lefave P. Matching of varying-size form stimuli in the pigeon. Bull Psychon Rev. 1984;22:591–593.

Peissig JJ, Kirkpatrick K, Young ME, Wasserman EE. Biederman I Effects of varying stimulus size on object recognition in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2006;32:419–430. PubMed

Vyazovska OV, Teng Y, Wasserman EA. Attentional tradeoffs in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014;101:337–354. PubMed

Welbergen JA, Davies NB. A parasite in Wolf's clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav Ecol. 2011;22:574–579.

Tvardíková K, Fuchs R. Tits use amodal completion in predator recognition: a field experiment. Anim Cogn. 2010;13:609–615. PubMed

Nováková N, Veselý P, Fuchs R. Object categorization by wild ranging birds—winter feeder experiments. Behav Process. 2017;143:7–12. PubMed

Grim T. Host recognition of brood parasites: implications for methodology in studies of enemy recognition. Auk. 2005;122:530.

Jenni L, Kéry M. Timing of autumn bird migration under climate change: advances in long–distance migrants, delays in short–distance migrants. Proc Royal Soc B. 2003;270:1467–1471. PubMed PMC

Cepák J, Klvaňa P, Škopek J, Schröpfer L, Jelínek M, Hořák D, Formánek F, Zárybnický J. Atlas migrace ptáků České republiky a Slovenska. Praha: Aventinum; 2008. pp. 524–525.

Visser ME, Perdeck AC, van Balen JH, Both C. Climate change leads to decreasing bird migration distances. Glob Change Biol. 2009;15:1859–1865.

Powell GVN. Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging. Anim Behav. 1974;22:501–505.

Elgar MA, Burren PJ, Posen M. Vigilance and perception of flock size in foraging House Sparrows (Passer domesticus L.) Behav. 1984;90:215–223.

Newton I. The adaptive radiation and feeding ecology of some British finches. Ibis. 1967;109:33–96.

Morse DH. Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecol Monogr. 1970;40:119–168.

Moreno E, Carrascal LM. Patch residence time and vigilance in birds foraging at feeders. Implications of bill shape. Ethol Ecolog Evol. 1991;3:345–350.

Zawadzka D, Zawadzki J. Breeding populations and diets of the Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus and the Hobby Falco subbuteo in the Wigry National Park (NE Poland) Acta Ornithol. 2001;36:25–31.

Bujoczek M, Ciach M. Seasonal changes in the avian diet of breeding sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus: how to fulfill the offspring's food demands. Zool Stud. 2009;48:215–222.

Němec M, Syrová M, Dokoupilová L, Veselý P, Šmilauer P, Landová E, Lišková S, Fuchs R. Surface texture and priming play important roles in predator recognition by the red-backed shrike in field experiments. Anim Cogn. 2015;18:259–268. PubMed

Nováková N, Veselý P, Fuchs R. Object categorization by wild-ranging birds in nest defence. Anim Cogn. 2020;23:203–213. PubMed

Austin GT, Smith EL. Winter foraging ecology of mixed insectivorous bird flocks in oak woodland in southern Arizona. Condor. 1972;74:17–24.

Fuller RA, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Barbosa O, Gaston KJ. Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban avian assemblages. Divers Distrib. 2008;13(1):131–137.

Wilson WE. The effects of supplemental feeding on wintering black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla) in central Maine: population and individual responses. Wilson J Ornithol. 2001;113:65–72.

Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2013.

Strange features are no better than no features: predator recognition by untrained birds

Red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo-hawk mimicry