BRAF V600E status may facilitate decision-making on active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
31790974
DOI
10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.017
PII: S0959-8049(19)30780-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Active surveillance, BRAF V600E mutation, Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, Prognosis, Risk stratification,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Thyroid Neoplasms genetics MeSH
- Carcinoma, Papillary genetics MeSH
- Watchful Waiting methods MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf genetics MeSH
- Decision Making MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Conservative active surveillance has been proposed for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), defined as ≤1.0 cm and lacking clinical aggressive features, but controversy exists with accepting it as not all such PTMCs are uniformly destined for benign prognosis. This study investigated whether BRAF V600E status could further risk stratify PTMC, particularly low-risk PTMC, and can thus help with more accurate case selection for conservative management. METHODS: This international multicenter study included 743 patients treated with total thyroidectomy for PTMC (584 women and 159 men), with a median age of 49 years (interquartile range [IQR], 39-59 years) and a median follow-up time of 53 months (IQR, 25-93 months). RESULTS: On overall analyses of all PTMCs, tumour recurrences were 6.4% (32/502) versus 10.8% (26/241) in BRAF mutation-negative versus BRAF mutation-positive patients (P = 0.041), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.44 (95% CI (confidence interval), 1.15-5.20) after multivariate adjustment for confounding clinical factors. On the analyses of low-risk PTMC, recurrences were 1.3% (5/383) versus 4.3% (6/139) in BRAF mutation-negative versus BRAF mutation-positive patients, with an HR of 6.65 (95% CI, 1.80-24.65) after adjustment for confounding clinical factors. BRAF mutation was associated with a significant decline in the Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival curve in low-risk PTMC. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF V600E differentiates the recurrence risk of PTMC, particularly low-risk PTMC. Given the robust negative predictive value, conservative active surveillance of BRAF mutation-negative low-risk PTMC is reasonable whereas the increased recurrence risk and other well-known adverse effects of BRAF V600E make the feasibility of long-term conservative surveillance uncertain for BRAF mutation-positive PTMC.
Department of Internal Medicine University of Perugia Perugia Italy
Department of Medicine Endocrinology Unit University of Padua Italy
Department of Molecular Endocrinology Institute of Endocrinology Prague Czech Republic
Endocrine Surgical Unit The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
Maria Sklodowska Curie Institute Oncology Center Gliwice Branch Gliwice Poland
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA
References provided by Crossref.org