Organic and inorganic amendment application on mercury-polluted soils: effects on soil chemical and biochemical properties
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
27053055
DOI
10.1007/s11356-016-6591-7
PII: 10.1007/s11356-016-6591-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Digestate, Fly ash, Mercury, Microbial activity, Microbial biomass, Nitrification, Soil pollution,
- MeSH
- arylsulfatasy chemie MeSH
- bakteriální proteiny chemie MeSH
- hexosaminidasy chemie MeSH
- koncentrace vodíkových iontů MeSH
- látky znečišťující půdu analýza chemie MeSH
- oxidoreduktasy chemie MeSH
- popel uhelný chemie MeSH
- půda chemie MeSH
- půdní mikrobiologie * MeSH
- regenerace a remediace životního prostředí MeSH
- rtuť analýza chemie MeSH
- znečištění životního prostředí MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- arylsulfatasy MeSH
- bakteriální proteiny MeSH
- hexosaminidasy MeSH
- látky znečišťující půdu MeSH
- oxidoreduktasy MeSH
- popel uhelný MeSH
- půda MeSH
- rtuť MeSH
On the basis of a previous study performed in our laboratory, the use of organic and inorganic amendments can significantly modify the Hg mobility in soil. We have compared the effectiveness of organic and inorganic amendments such as digestate and fly ash, respectively, reducing the Hg mobility in Chernozem and Luvisol soils differing in their physicochemical properties. Hence, the aim of this work was to compare the impact of digestate and fly ash application on the chemical and biochemical parameters in these two mercury-contaminated soils in a model batch experiment. Chernozem and Luvisol soils were artificially contaminated with Hg and then incubated under controlled conditions for 21 days. Digestate and fly ash were applied to both soils in a dose of 10 and 1.5 %, respectively, and soil samples were collected after 1, 7, 14, and 21 days of incubation. The presence of Hg in both soils negatively affected to processes such as nitrification, provoked a decline in the soil microbial biomass C (soil microbial biomass C (MBC)), and the microbial activities (arylsulfatase, and β-glucosaminidase) in both soils. Meanwhile, the digestate addition to Chernozem and Luvisol soils contaminated with Hg improved the soil chemical properties (pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), N (Ntot), inorganic-N forms (N-NH4 (+) and N-NO3 (-))), as consequence of high content in C and N contained in digestate. Likewise, the soil MBC and soil microbial activities (dehydrogenase, arylsulfatase, and β-glucosaminidase) were greatly enhanced by the digestate application in both soils. In contrast, fly ash application did not have a remarkable positive effect when compared to digestate in Chernozem and Luvisol soil contaminated with mercury. These results may indicate that the use of organic amendments such as digestate considerably improved the soil health in Chernozem and Luvisol compared with fly ash, alleviating the detrimental impact of Hg. Probably, the chemical properties present in digestate may determine its use as a suitable amendment for the assisted-natural attenuation of mercury-polluted soils.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Biosci Bioeng. 2006 Sep;102(3):157-61 PubMed
J Environ Manage. 2015 Oct 1;162:63-73 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2008 Dec;99(18):8631-6 PubMed
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:407049 PubMed
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Apr;114:257-62 PubMed
Waste Manag. 2008;28(1):215-25 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2001 Sep;79(2):135-46 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2014 Jul;107:145-62 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2005 Aug;96(12):1405-14 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2007 Jun;68(3):409-13 PubMed
J Environ Manage. 2014 Jun 15;139:146-53 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2006 Aug;64(8):1264-73 PubMed
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2010 Jul;17(6):1237-44 PubMed
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Sep;22(18):14325-36 PubMed
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Mar;24(3):634-40 PubMed
Sci Total Environ. 2008 Nov 15;406(1-2):43-56 PubMed
Sci Total Environ. 2006 Dec 1;371(1-3):110-24 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2015 Nov;139:604-8 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Nov;62(2):142-60 PubMed
Microb Ecol. 2002 Jul;44(1):49-58 PubMed
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Jan 1;502:218-23 PubMed
Environ Pollut. 2006 Nov;144(1):51-61 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2005 Dec;61(8):1175-82 PubMed
J Environ Qual. 2005 Jan-Feb;34(1):139-48 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001 Jun;36(1):1-9 PubMed
Rev Environ Health. 2003 Jan-Mar;18(1):65-73 PubMed