On the basis of a previous study performed in our laboratory, the use of organic and inorganic amendments can significantly modify the Hg mobility in soil. We have compared the effectiveness of organic and inorganic amendments such as digestate and fly ash, respectively, reducing the Hg mobility in Chernozem and Luvisol soils differing in their physicochemical properties. Hence, the aim of this work was to compare the impact of digestate and fly ash application on the chemical and biochemical parameters in these two mercury-contaminated soils in a model batch experiment. Chernozem and Luvisol soils were artificially contaminated with Hg and then incubated under controlled conditions for 21 days. Digestate and fly ash were applied to both soils in a dose of 10 and 1.5 %, respectively, and soil samples were collected after 1, 7, 14, and 21 days of incubation. The presence of Hg in both soils negatively affected to processes such as nitrification, provoked a decline in the soil microbial biomass C (soil microbial biomass C (MBC)), and the microbial activities (arylsulfatase, and β-glucosaminidase) in both soils. Meanwhile, the digestate addition to Chernozem and Luvisol soils contaminated with Hg improved the soil chemical properties (pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), N (Ntot), inorganic-N forms (N-NH4 (+) and N-NO3 (-))), as consequence of high content in C and N contained in digestate. Likewise, the soil MBC and soil microbial activities (dehydrogenase, arylsulfatase, and β-glucosaminidase) were greatly enhanced by the digestate application in both soils. In contrast, fly ash application did not have a remarkable positive effect when compared to digestate in Chernozem and Luvisol soil contaminated with mercury. These results may indicate that the use of organic amendments such as digestate considerably improved the soil health in Chernozem and Luvisol compared with fly ash, alleviating the detrimental impact of Hg. Probably, the chemical properties present in digestate may determine its use as a suitable amendment for the assisted-natural attenuation of mercury-polluted soils.

Department of Agro Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Kamýcká 129 Prague 6 Suchdol Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

J Biosci Bioeng. 2006 Sep;102(3):157-61 PubMed

J Environ Manage. 2015 Oct 1;162:63-73 PubMed

Bioresour Technol. 2008 Dec;99(18):8631-6 PubMed

ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:407049 PubMed

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Apr;114:257-62 PubMed

Waste Manag. 2008;28(1):215-25 PubMed

Bioresour Technol. 2001 Sep;79(2):135-46 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2014 Jul;107:145-62 PubMed

Bioresour Technol. 2005 Aug;96(12):1405-14 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2007 Jun;68(3):409-13 PubMed

J Environ Manage. 2014 Jun 15;139:146-53 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2006 Aug;64(8):1264-73 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2010 Jul;17(6):1237-44 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Sep;22(18):14325-36 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Mar;24(3):634-40 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2008 Nov 15;406(1-2):43-56 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2006 Dec 1;371(1-3):110-24 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2015 Nov;139:604-8 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Nov;62(2):142-60 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2002 Jul;44(1):49-58 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2015 Jan 1;502:218-23 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2006 Nov;144(1):51-61 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2005 Dec;61(8):1175-82 PubMed

J Environ Qual. 2005 Jan-Feb;34(1):139-48 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001 Jun;36(1):1-9 PubMed

Rev Environ Health. 2003 Jan-Mar;18(1):65-73 PubMed