Predictors of vaginal delivery after cervical ripening using a synthetic osmotic dilator
Language English Country Ireland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Observational Study
PubMed
32028144
DOI
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.048
PII: S0301-2115(20)30057-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Cervical ripening, Dilapan, Induction, Labor, Mechanical,
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Cesarean Section statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Gestational Age MeSH
- Labor, Induced methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Polymers therapeutic use MeSH
- Proportional Hazards Models MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Delivery, Obstetric statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Cervical Ripening * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- dilapan MeSH Browser
- Polymers MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the determinants of vaginal delivery and safety in women undergoing cervical ripening with a synthetic osmotic dilator (Dilapan-S) prior to induction of labor. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of an international multicenter prospective observational study of Dilapan-S for cervical ripening in pregnancies greater than 32 weeks. Data were obtained in a standardized fashion and entered into a centralized electronic data capture system. The association between Bishop score and vaginal delivery was further evaluated with a multivariate receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A Wilcoxon rank test and multivariable logistic regression were used for statistical analysis (significance: P < .05). RESULTS: Between May 2015 and July 2016, 444 pregnant women were included. Three hundred ten (70 %) delivered vaginally. Compared to patients who underwent cesarean delivery, those who delivered vaginally were more likely to have a history of prior vaginal delivery. Vaginal delivery rates were significantly correlated with Bishop scores of pre and post Dilapan-S and difference. After adjusting for age, BMI, number of dilators, cervical ripening time, and gestational age, both prior vaginal delivery and post-Dilapan-S Bishop scores were strong predictors of vaginal delivery (estimate coefficient: 0.1275 ± 0.03 P = .0002; 0.049 ± 0.01 P = .0001; respectively). Aggregate ROC accounting for these variables further supported these findings (AUC = 0.734). The lower confidence interval limit of vaginal delivery rates was above 50 % when post-Dilapan-S Bishop scores were ≥ 5. Cox regression analyses demonstrated that the duration of labor was significant shorter in women that had vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: Bishop scores after cervical ripening with Dilapan-S are good predictors of vaginal delivery. Bishop scores < 5 post Dilapan-S may warrant further cervical ripening. Further level 1 trials are needed to compare osmotic dilators to other ripening methods.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Masaryk University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston TX USA
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
References provided by Crossref.org