Transcriptional analysis of wheat seedlings inoculated with Fusarium culmorum under continual exposure to disease defence inductors
Language English Country United States Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
32045412
PubMed Central
PMC7012390
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0224413
PII: PONE-D-19-28330
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Fusarium immunology MeSH
- Sodium Bicarbonate pharmacology MeSH
- Plant Diseases genetics immunology microbiology MeSH
- Disease Resistance genetics MeSH
- Triticum genetics MeSH
- Seedlings genetics microbiology MeSH
- Gene Expression Profiling * MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Sodium Bicarbonate MeSH
A facultative parasite of cereals, Fusarium culmorum is a soil-, air- and seed-borne fungus causing foot and root rot, fusarium seedling blight, and especially Fusarium head blight, a spike disease leading to decreased yield and mycotoxin contamination of grain. In the present study, we tested changes in expression of wheat genes (B2H2, ICS, PAL, and PR2) involved in defence against diseases. We first compared expression of the analysed genes in seedlings of non-inoculated and artificially inoculated wheat (variety Bohemia). The second part of the experiment compared expression of these genes in seedlings grown under various treatment conditions. These treatments were chosen to determine the effects of prochloraz, sodium bicarbonate, ergosterol, aescin and potassium iodide on expression of the analysed defence genes. In addition to the inoculated and non-inoculated cultivar Bohemia, we additionally examined two other varieties of wheat with contrasting resistance to Fusarium sp. infection. These were the blue aleurone layer variety Scorpion that is susceptible to Fusarium sp. infection and variety V2-49-17 with yellow endosperm and partial resistance to Fusarium sp. infection. In this manner, we were able to compare potential effects of inductors upon defence gene expression among three varieties with different susceptibility to infection but also between inoculated and non-inoculated seedlings of a single variety. The lowest infection levels were detected in the sodium bicarbonate treatment. Sodium bicarbonate had not only negative influence on Fusarium growth but also positively affected expression of plant defence genes. Expression of the four marker genes shown to be important in plant defence was significantly affected by the treatments. The greatest upregulation in comparison to the water control was identified under all treatments for the B2H2 gene. Only expression of PAL under the ergosterol and prochloraz treatments were not statistically significant.
Department of Botany Faculty of Science Palacký University in Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Experimental Biology Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics Agrotest Fyto Ltd Kroměříž Czech Republic
Department of Plant Pathology Agrotest Fyto Ltd Kroměříž Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Parry DW, Jenkinson P, McLeod L. Fusarium ear blight in small grain cereals–a review. Plant Pathol. 1995; 44:207–238. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02773.x DOI
Khan MR, Fischer S, Egan D, Doohan FM. Biological control of Fusarium seedling blight disease of wheat and barley. Phytopathology. 2006; 96:386–394. 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0386 PubMed DOI
Wong LSL, Tekauz A, Leslie D, Abramson D, McKenzie RIH. Prevalence, distribution and importance of Fusarium head blight in winter in Manitoba. Can J Plant Pathol. 1992; 14:233–238. 10.1080/07060669209500882 DOI
Bai G, Shaner G. Management and resistance in wheat and barley to fusarium head blight. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004; 42:135–161. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140340 PubMed DOI
Wagacha JM, Muthomi JW. Fusarium culmorum: Infection process, mechanisms of mycotoxin production and their role in pathogenesis in wheat. Crop Protection. 2007; 26(7):877–885. 10.1016/j.cropro.2006.09.003 DOI
Jørgensen LN, Nielsen LK, Nielsen BJ. Control of seedling blight in winter wheat by seed treatments–impact on emergence, crop stand, yield and deoxynivalenol. Acta Agr Scand B-Sp. 2012; 62:431–440. 10.1080/09064710.2011.641028 DOI
D’Angelo DL, Bradley CA, Ames KA, Willyerd KT, Madden LV, Paul PA. Efficacy of fungicide applications during and after anthesis against Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol in soft red winter wheat. Plant Dis. 2014; 98:1387–1397. 10.1094/PDIS-01-14-0091-RE PubMed DOI
Pereyra SA, Dill-Macky R, Sims AL. Survival and inoculum production of Gibberella zeae in wheat residue. Plant Dis. 2004; 88:724–730. 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.7.724 PubMed DOI
Duba A, Goriewa-Duba K, Wachowska U. A review of the interactions between wheat and wheat pathogens: Zymoseptoria tritici, Fusarium spp. and Parastagonospora nodorum. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(4). 10.3390/ijms19041138 PubMed DOI PMC
Kage U, Karre S, Kushalappa AC, McCartney C. Identification and characterization of a fusarium head blight resistance gene TaACT in wheat QTL-2DL. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15(4):447–457. 10.1111/pbi.12641 PubMed DOI PMC
Rawat N, Pumphrey MO, Liu S, Zhang X, Tiwari VK, Ando K, et al. Wheat Fhb1 encodes a chimeric lectin with agglutinin domains and a pore-forming toxin-like domain conferring resistance to Fusarium head blight. Nat Genet. 2016; 48:1576 10.1038/ng.3706 PubMed DOI
Cuthbert PA, Somers DJ, Thomas J, Cloutier S, Brulé-Babel A. Fine mapping Fhb1, a major gene controlling fusarium head blight resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 112(8):1465 10.1007/s00122-006-0249-7 PubMed DOI
Buerstmayr H, Ban T, Anderson A. QTL mapping and marker-assisted selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat: a review. Plant Breeding. 2009; 128:1–26. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01550.x DOI
Pritsch C, Muehlbauer GJ, Bushnell WR, Somers DA, Vance CP. Fungal development and induction of defense response genes during early infection of wheat spikes by Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000; 13(2):159–69. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.2.159 PubMed DOI
Kang Z, Buchenauer H, Huang L, Han Q, Zhang H. Cytological and immunocytochemical studies on responses of wheat spikes of the resistant Chinese cv. Sumai 3 and the susceptible cv. Xiaoyan 22 to infection by Fusarium graminearum. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2007; 120(4):383–396. 10.1007/s10658-007-9230-9 DOI
Wiesel L, Newton AC, Elliott I, Booty D, Gilroy EM, Birch PR, et al. Molecular effects of resistance elicitors from biological origin and their potential for crop protection. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5:655 10.3389/fpls.2014.00655 PubMed DOI PMC
Chakraborty N, Chandra S, Acharya K. Biochemical basis of improvement of defense in tomato plant against Fusarium wilt by CaCl2. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2017; 23(3):581–596. 10.1007/s12298-017-0450-y PubMed DOI PMC
Cardoza RE, McCormick SP, Malmierca MG, Olivera ER, Alexander NJ, Monte E, et al. Effects of trichothecene production on the plant defense response and fungal physiology: overexpression of the trichoderma arundinaceum tri4 gene in T. harzianum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015; 81(18): 6355–6366. 10.1128/AEM.01626-15 PubMed DOI PMC
Tugizimana F, Steenkamp PA, Piater LA, Dubery IA. Ergosterol-induced sesquiterpenoid synthesis in tobacco cells. Molecules. 2012; 17(2):1698–1715. 10.3390/molecules17021698 PubMed DOI PMC
Matušinsky P, Polišenská I, Kadlíková M, Tvarůžek L, Spitzerová D, Spitzer T. Dynamics of T-2 toxin synthesis on barley ears. J Food Agr Environ. 2013; 11(3–4):1114–1122.
Travella S, Klimm TE, Keller B. RNA interference-based gene silencing as an efficient tool for functional genomics in hexaploid bread wheat. Plant Physiol. 2006; 142:6–20. 10.1104/pp.106.084517 PubMed DOI PMC
Sun H, Guo Z, Gao L, Zhao G, Zhang W, Zhou R, et al. DNA methylation pattern of Photoperiod-B1 is associated with photoperiod insensitivity in wheat (Triticum aestivum). New Phytol. 2014; 204(3): 682–692. 10.1111/nph.12948 PubMed DOI
Fahmy AH, Hassanein RA, Hashem HA, Ibrahim AS, El Shihy OM, Qaid EA. Developing of transgenic wheat cultivars for improved disease resistance. J App Biol Biotech. 2018; 6(2):31–40. 10.7324/JABB.2018.60206 DOI
Shin S, Mackintosh CA, Lewis J, Heinen SJ, Radmer L, Dill-Macky R, et al. Transgenic wheat expressing a barley class II chitinase gene has enhanced resistance against Fusarium graminearum. J Exp Bot. 2008; 59(9):2371–2378. 10.1093/jxb/ern103 PubMed DOI PMC
Bliffeld M, Mundy J, Potrykus I, Futterer J. Genetic engineering of wheat for increased resistance to powdery mildew disease. Theor Appl Genet. 1999; 98:1079–1086. 10.1007/s001220051170 DOI
Oldach KH, Becker D, Lörz H. Heterologous expression of genes mediating enhanced fungal resistance in transgenic wheat. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 14(7):832–838. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.7.832 PubMed DOI
Selitrennikoff CP. Antifungal proteins. Appl Environ Microb. 2001; 67(7):2883–2894. 10.1128/AEM.67.7.2883-2894.2001 PubMed DOI PMC
Li WL, Faris JD, Muthukrishnan S, Liu DJ, Chen PD, Gill BS. Isolation and characterization of novel cDNA clones of acidic chitinases and β−1,3-glucanases from wheat spikes infected by Fusarium graminearum. Theor Appl Genet. 2000; 102:353–362. 10.1007/s001220051653 DOI
Pritsch C, Muehlbauer GJ, Bushnell WR, Somer DA, Vance CP. Fungal development and induction of defense response genes during early infection of wheat spikes by Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000; 13:159–169. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.2.159 PubMed DOI
Brenchley WE. The effect of iodine on soils and plants. Ann Appl Biol. 1924; 11:86–112. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1924.tb05695.x DOI
Umaly RC, Poel LW. Effects of iodine in various formulations on the growth of barley and pea plants in nutrient solution culture. Ann Bot-London. 1971; 35:127–131. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084451 DOI
Duborská E, Urík M, Kubová J. Interaction with soil enhances the toxic effect of iodide and iodate on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) compared to artificial culture media during initial growth stage. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2018; 64(1):46–57. 10.1080/03650340.2017.1328104 DOI
Merhej J, Boutigny AL, Pinson-Gadais L, Richard-Forget F, Barreau C. Acidic pH as a determinant of TRI gene expression and trichothecene B biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2010; 27(5):710–717. 10.1080/19440040903514531 PubMed DOI
Merhej J., Richard-Forget F., Barreau Ch. The pH regulatory factor Pad1 regulates Tri gene expression and trichothecene production in Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011; 48(3): 275–284. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.11.008 PubMed DOI
Merhej J., Urban M., Dufresne M., Hammond-Kosack KE, Richard-Forget F., Barreau Ch. The velvet gene, FgVe1, affects fungal development and positively regulates trichothecene biosynthesis and pathogenicity in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012; 13(4):363–374. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00755.x PubMed DOI PMC
Jansen C, von Wettstein D, Schäfer W, Kogel KH, Felk A, Maier FJ. Infection patterns in barley and wheat spikes inoculated with wild-type and trichodiene synthase gene disrupted Fusarium graminearum. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102(46):16892–16897. 10.1073/pnas.0508467102 PubMed DOI PMC
Proctor RH, Hohn TM, McCormick SP. Reduced virulence of Gibberella zeae caused by disruption of a trichothecene toxin biosynthetic gene. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1995; 8:593–601. 10.1094/mpmi-8-0593 PubMed DOI
Hang YD, Woodams EE. Control of Fusarium oxysporum by baking soda. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2003; 36(8):803–805. 10.1016/S0023-6438(03)00095-1 DOI
Zaker M. Antifungal evaluation of some inorganic salts against three phytopathogenic fungi. Int J Agr Crop Sci. 2014; 7(14):1352–1358.
Hao J, Pétriacq P, de Bont L, Hodges M, Gakière B. Characterization of L-aspartate oxidase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2018; 271:133–142. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.03.016 PubMed DOI
Wildermuth MC, Dewdney J, Wu G, Ausubel FM. Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature. 2001; 414(6863):562–565. 10.1038/35107108 PubMed DOI
Kong L, Anderson JM, Ohm HW. Induction of wheat defense and stress-related genes in response to Fusarium graminearum. Genome. 2005; 48(1): 29–40. 10.1139/g04-097 PubMed DOI
Gao CS, Kou XJ, Li HP, Zhang JB, Saad ASI, Liao YC. Inverse effects of Arabidopsis NPR1 gene on fusarium seedling blight and fusarium head blight in transgenic wheat. Plant Pathology. 2013; 62(2): 383–392. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02656.x DOI
Ding L, Xu H, Yi H, Yang L, Kong Z, Zhang L. et al. Resistance to hemi-biotrophic F. graminearum infection is associated with coordinated and ordered expression of diverse defense signaling pathways. PLoS One. 2011; 6(4), e19008 10.1371/journal.pone.0019008 PubMed DOI PMC