Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and recommendations

. 2020 Jun ; 91 (6) : 638-649. [epub] 20200228

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32111637

Grantová podpora
CS-2014-14-016 Department of Health - United Kingdom
K23 NS045902 NINDS NIH HHS - United States

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify existing outcome measures for functional neurological disorder (FND), to inform the development of recommendations and to guide future research on FND outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify existing FND-specific outcome measures and the most common measurement domains and measures in previous treatment studies. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were conducted between January 1965 and June 2019. The findings were discussed during two international meetings of the FND-Core Outcome Measures group. RESULTS: Five FND-specific measures were identified-three clinician-rated and two patient-rated-but their measurement properties have not been rigorously evaluated. No single measure was identified for use across the range of FND symptoms in adults. Across randomised controlled trials (k=40) and observational treatment studies (k=40), outcome measures most often assessed core FND symptom change. Other domains measured commonly were additional physical and psychological symptoms, life impact (ie, quality of life, disability and general functioning) and health economics/cost-utility (eg, healthcare resource use and quality-adjusted life years). CONCLUSIONS: There are few well-validated FND-specific outcome measures. Thus, at present, we recommend that existing outcome measures, known to be reliable, valid and responsive in FND or closely related populations, are used to capture key outcome domains. Increased consistency in outcome measurement will facilitate comparison of treatment effects across FND symptom types and treatment modalities. Future work needs to more rigorously validate outcome measures used in this population.

Academic Neurology Unit University of Sheffield Royal Hallamshire Hospital Sheffield UK

Department of Clinical Neurosciences School of Molecular and Clinical Medicine Western General Hospital University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

Department of Neurological Sciences Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA

Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA

Department of Neurology Hopital Avicenne Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Paris Île de France France

Department of Neurology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Department of Neurology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour Nijmegen Netherlands

Department of Neurology Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine Stony Brook New York USA

Department of Neurology University Hospital Bern and University of Bern Bern Switzerland

Department of Neurology University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum Ruhr University Bochum Bochum Germany

Department of Neurology University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands

Department of Neuroscience Biomedicine and Movement University of Verona Verona Italy

Department of Psychiatry Austin Health University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

Department of Psychiatry Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

Department of Psychiatry Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA

Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Emory Centre for Ethics Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA

Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry Therapy Services Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA United States

Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology Rhode Island Hospital Brown Medical School Providence RI USA

Discipline of Psychiatry and Child and Adolescent Health The Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney Medical School Sydney New South Wales Australia

Donald Gordon Medical Centre University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa

Epilepsy Research Center Shiraz Medical School Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz Iran Islamic Republic of

FND Hope International Salmon Idaho USA

Gardner Family Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Department of Neurology University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA

Human Motor Control Section National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Bethesda Maryland USA

Institute of Mental Health Division of Psychiatry Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom

Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK

Jefferson Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Department of Neurology Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Mater Neurosciences Centre Brisbane Queensland Australia

Movement Disorders Clinic and the Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada

Neuroscience Research Centre Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences St George's University London UK

Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group New York New York USA

Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic Department of Neurology Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK

Therapy Services The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery London UK

University College London Institute of Neurology National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery London UK

Zobrazit více v PubMed

American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). 5th edn Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.

Espay AJ, Aybek S, Carson A, et al. . Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment of functional neurological disorders. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:1132–41. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1264 PubMed DOI PMC

Carson A, Lehn A. Epidemiology. Handb Clin Neurol 2016;139:47–60. 10.1016/B978-0-12-801772-2.00005-9 PubMed DOI

Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Hallett M, Jankovic J. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders. Neurobiol Dis 2019;127:32–44. 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.02.013 PubMed DOI

Nicholson TR, Carson A, Edwards MJ, et al. . Outcome measures for functional neurological disorder: a review of the theoretical complexities. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci:appi.neuropsych 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19060128 PubMed DOI

Kenney C, Diamond A, Mejia N, et al. . Distinguishing psychogenic and essential tremor. J Neurol Sci 2007;263:94–9. 10.1016/j.jns.2007.06.008 PubMed DOI

McWhirter L, Stone J, Sandercock P, et al. . Hoover's sign for the diagnosis of functional weakness: a prospective unblinded cohort study in patients with suspected stroke. J Psychosom Res 2011;71:384–6. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.09.003 PubMed DOI

Benbadis SR. Provocative techniques should be used for the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2009;15:106–9. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.02.002 PubMed DOI

Parees I, Saifee TA, Kassavetis P, et al. . Believing is perceiving: mismatch between self-report and actigraphy in psychogenic tremor. Brain 2012;135:117–23. 10.1093/brain/awr292 PubMed DOI

Gelauff JM, Kingma EM, Kalkman JS, et al. . Fatigue, not self-rated motor symptom severity, affects quality of life in functional motor disorders. J Neurol 2018;265:1803–9. 10.1007/s00415-018-8915-7 PubMed DOI

Věchetová G, Slovák M, Kemlink D, et al. . The impact of non-motor symptoms on the health-related quality of life in patients with functional movement disorders. J Psychosom Res 2018;115:32–7. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.10.001 PubMed DOI

Barsky AJ, Orav EJ, Bates DW. Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:903–10. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.8.903 PubMed DOI

Harris AM, Orav EJ, Bates DW, et al. . Somatization increases disability independent of comorbidity. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:155–61. 10.1007/s11606-008-0845-0 PubMed DOI PMC

Bodde NMG, Janssen AMAJ, Theuns C, et al. . Factors involved in the long-term prognosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. J Psychosom Res 2007;62:545–51. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.015 PubMed DOI

Gelauff J, Stone J, Edwards M, et al. . The prognosis of functional (psychogenic) motor symptoms: a systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:220–6. 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305321 PubMed DOI

Pick S, Mellers JDC, Goldstein LH. Dissociation in patients with dissociative seizures: relationships with trauma and seizure symptoms. Psychol Med 2017;47:1215–29. 10.1017/S0033291716003093 PubMed DOI

Reuber M, Pukrop R, Bauer J, et al. . Outcome in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: 1 to 10-year follow-up in 164 patients. Ann Neurol 2003;53:305–11. 10.1002/ana.3000 PubMed DOI

LaFrance WC, Syc S. Depression and symptoms affect quality of life in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Neurology 2009;73:366–71. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b04c83 PubMed DOI PMC

Lawton G, Mayor RJ, Howlett S, et al. . Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and health-related quality of life: the relationship with psychological distress and other physical symptoms. Epilepsy Behav 2009;14:167–71. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.09.029 PubMed DOI

Feinstein A, Stergiopoulos V, Fine J, et al. . Psychiatric outcome in patients with a psychogenic movement disorder: a prospective study. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2001;14:169–76. PubMed

Rawlings GH, Brown I, Reuber M. Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2017;68:153–8. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.10.035 PubMed DOI

Williams IA, Howlett S, Levita L, et al. . Changes in emotion processing following brief augmented Psychodynamic interpersonal therapy for functional neurological symptoms. Behav Cogn Psychother 2018;46:350–66. 10.1017/S1352465817000807 PubMed DOI

Pick S, Goldstein LH, Perez DL, et al. . Emotional processing in functional neurological disorder: a review, biopsychosocial model and research agenda. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019;90:704–11. 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319201 PubMed DOI PMC

Reuber M, Mitchell AJ, Howlett S, et al. . Measuring outcome in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: how relevant is seizure remission? Epilepsia 2005;46:1788–95. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00280.x PubMed DOI

Jones B, Reuber M, Norman P. Correlates of health-related quality of life in adults with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a systematic review. Epilepsia 2016;57:171–81. 10.1111/epi.13268 PubMed DOI

Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, et al. . Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 2012;13:132 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132 PubMed DOI PMC

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PubMed DOI PMC

Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, et al. . Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health 2018;6:149 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 PubMed DOI PMC

Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. . COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018;27:1147–57. 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Prinsen CAC, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al. . How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline. Trials 2016;17:449 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. . COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018;27:1171–9. 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Hinson VK, Cubo E, Comella CL, et al. . Rating scale for psychogenic movement disorders: scale development and Clinimetric testing. Mov Disord 2005;20:1592–7. 10.1002/mds.20650 PubMed DOI

Nielsen G, Ricciardi L, Meppelink AM, et al. . A simplified version of the psychogenic movement disorders rating scale: the simplified functional movement disorders rating scale (S-FMDRS). Mov Disord Clin Pract 2017;4:710–6. 10.1002/mdc3.12475 PubMed DOI PMC

Cianci V, Ferlazzo E, Condino F, et al. . Rating scale for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: scale development and Clinimetric testing. Epilepsy Behav 2011;21:128–31. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.03.025 PubMed DOI

Sarfraz N, Ijaz T. Development of conversion disorder scale for children. J Behav Sci 2014;24:44–56.

Ijaz T, Nasir A, Sarfraz N, et al. . Psychometric properties of conversion disorder Scale- revised (CdS) for children. J Pak Med Assoc 2017;67:725–30. PubMed

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. . The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539–49. 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 PubMed DOI PMC

Ataoglu A, Ozcetin A, Icmeli C, et al. . Paradoxical therapy in conversion reaction. J Korean Med Sci 2003;18:581–4. 10.3346/jkms.2003.18.4.581 PubMed DOI PMC

Drane DL, LaRoche SM, Ganesh GA, et al. . A standardized diagnostic approach and ongoing feedback improves outcome in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2016;54:34–9. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.10.026 PubMed DOI

Goldstein LH, Chalder T, Chigwedere C, et al. . Cognitive-Behavioral therapy for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a pilot RCT. Neurology 2010;74:1986–94. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e39658 PubMed DOI PMC

Goldstein LH, Mellers JDC, Landau S, et al. . Cognitive behavioural therapy vs standardised medical care for adults with dissociative non-epileptic seizures (codes): a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Neurol 2015;15:98 10.1186/s12883-015-0350-0 PubMed DOI PMC

LaFrance WC, Keitner GI, Papandonatos GD, et al. . Pilot pharmacologic randomized controlled trial for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Neurology 2010;75:1166–73. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f4d5a9 PubMed DOI PMC

Khattak T, Farooq S, Jan B. Behavior therapy in dissociative convulsions disorder. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2006;16:359–63. PubMed

Oto M, Espie CA, Duncan R. An exploratory randomized controlled trial of immediate versus delayed withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic attacks (PNEAs). Epilepsia 2010;51:1994–9. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02696.x PubMed DOI

Chen DK, Maheshwari A, Franks R, et al. . Brief group psychoeducation for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a neurologist-initiated program in an epilepsy center. Epilepsia 2014;55:156–66. 10.1111/epi.12481 PubMed DOI

Guy W. US dept health, education and welfare publication (ADM) 76-338. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, 1976: 218–22.

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med 2002;64:258–66. 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008 PubMed DOI

Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R: symptom Checklist-90-R: administration, scoring, and procedures manual. NCS Pearson 1996.

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–70. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x PubMed DOI

Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck depression inventory-II. Pearson 1996.

Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, et al. . An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:893–7. 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893 PubMed DOI

Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960;23:56–62. 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 PubMed DOI PMC

Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959;32:50–5. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x PubMed DOI

Bernstein EVEM, Putnam FW. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986;174:727–35. 10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004 PubMed DOI

Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–33. PubMed

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The mos 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83. PubMed

Cramer JA, Perrine K, Devinsky O, et al. . Development and cross-cultural translations of a 31-Item quality of life in epilepsy inventory. Epilepsia 1998;39:81–8. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01278.x PubMed DOI

Cramer JA, Perrine K, Devinsky O, et al. . A brief questionnaire to screen for quality of life in epilepsy the QOLIE-10. Epilepsia 1996;37:577–82. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00612.x PubMed DOI

Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. . The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:461–4. 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461 PubMed DOI

American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders - fourth edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...