Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and recommendations
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, systematický přehled
Grantová podpora
CS-2014-14-016
Department of Health - United Kingdom
K23 NS045902
NINDS NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
32111637
PubMed Central
PMC7279198
DOI
10.1136/jnnp-2019-322180
PII: jnnp-2019-322180
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- clinical neurology, conversion disorder, functional neurological disorder, movement disorders, neuropsychiatry,
- MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoci nervového systému diagnóza terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify existing outcome measures for functional neurological disorder (FND), to inform the development of recommendations and to guide future research on FND outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify existing FND-specific outcome measures and the most common measurement domains and measures in previous treatment studies. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were conducted between January 1965 and June 2019. The findings were discussed during two international meetings of the FND-Core Outcome Measures group. RESULTS: Five FND-specific measures were identified-three clinician-rated and two patient-rated-but their measurement properties have not been rigorously evaluated. No single measure was identified for use across the range of FND symptoms in adults. Across randomised controlled trials (k=40) and observational treatment studies (k=40), outcome measures most often assessed core FND symptom change. Other domains measured commonly were additional physical and psychological symptoms, life impact (ie, quality of life, disability and general functioning) and health economics/cost-utility (eg, healthcare resource use and quality-adjusted life years). CONCLUSIONS: There are few well-validated FND-specific outcome measures. Thus, at present, we recommend that existing outcome measures, known to be reliable, valid and responsive in FND or closely related populations, are used to capture key outcome domains. Increased consistency in outcome measurement will facilitate comparison of treatment effects across FND symptom types and treatment modalities. Future work needs to more rigorously validate outcome measures used in this population.
Academic Neurology Unit University of Sheffield Royal Hallamshire Hospital Sheffield UK
Department of Neurological Sciences Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA
Department of Neurology Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
Department of Neurology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
Department of Neurology University Hospital Bern and University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Department of Neuroscience Biomedicine and Movement University of Verona Verona Italy
Department of Psychiatry Austin Health University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
Department of Psychiatry Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA
Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology Rhode Island Hospital Brown Medical School Providence RI USA
Donald Gordon Medical Centre University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
FND Hope International Salmon Idaho USA
Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK
Mater Neurosciences Centre Brisbane Queensland Australia
Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group New York New York USA
School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK
Therapy Services The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery London UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). 5th edn Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
Espay AJ, Aybek S, Carson A, et al. . Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment of functional neurological disorders. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:1132–41. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1264 PubMed DOI PMC
Carson A, Lehn A. Epidemiology. Handb Clin Neurol 2016;139:47–60. 10.1016/B978-0-12-801772-2.00005-9 PubMed DOI
Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Hallett M, Jankovic J. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders. Neurobiol Dis 2019;127:32–44. 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.02.013 PubMed DOI
Nicholson TR, Carson A, Edwards MJ, et al. . Outcome measures for functional neurological disorder: a review of the theoretical complexities. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci:appi.neuropsych 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19060128 PubMed DOI
Kenney C, Diamond A, Mejia N, et al. . Distinguishing psychogenic and essential tremor. J Neurol Sci 2007;263:94–9. 10.1016/j.jns.2007.06.008 PubMed DOI
McWhirter L, Stone J, Sandercock P, et al. . Hoover's sign for the diagnosis of functional weakness: a prospective unblinded cohort study in patients with suspected stroke. J Psychosom Res 2011;71:384–6. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.09.003 PubMed DOI
Benbadis SR. Provocative techniques should be used for the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2009;15:106–9. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.02.002 PubMed DOI
Parees I, Saifee TA, Kassavetis P, et al. . Believing is perceiving: mismatch between self-report and actigraphy in psychogenic tremor. Brain 2012;135:117–23. 10.1093/brain/awr292 PubMed DOI
Gelauff JM, Kingma EM, Kalkman JS, et al. . Fatigue, not self-rated motor symptom severity, affects quality of life in functional motor disorders. J Neurol 2018;265:1803–9. 10.1007/s00415-018-8915-7 PubMed DOI
Věchetová G, Slovák M, Kemlink D, et al. . The impact of non-motor symptoms on the health-related quality of life in patients with functional movement disorders. J Psychosom Res 2018;115:32–7. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.10.001 PubMed DOI
Barsky AJ, Orav EJ, Bates DW. Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:903–10. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.8.903 PubMed DOI
Harris AM, Orav EJ, Bates DW, et al. . Somatization increases disability independent of comorbidity. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:155–61. 10.1007/s11606-008-0845-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Bodde NMG, Janssen AMAJ, Theuns C, et al. . Factors involved in the long-term prognosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. J Psychosom Res 2007;62:545–51. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.015 PubMed DOI
Gelauff J, Stone J, Edwards M, et al. . The prognosis of functional (psychogenic) motor symptoms: a systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:220–6. 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305321 PubMed DOI
Pick S, Mellers JDC, Goldstein LH. Dissociation in patients with dissociative seizures: relationships with trauma and seizure symptoms. Psychol Med 2017;47:1215–29. 10.1017/S0033291716003093 PubMed DOI
Reuber M, Pukrop R, Bauer J, et al. . Outcome in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: 1 to 10-year follow-up in 164 patients. Ann Neurol 2003;53:305–11. 10.1002/ana.3000 PubMed DOI
LaFrance WC, Syc S. Depression and symptoms affect quality of life in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Neurology 2009;73:366–71. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b04c83 PubMed DOI PMC
Lawton G, Mayor RJ, Howlett S, et al. . Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and health-related quality of life: the relationship with psychological distress and other physical symptoms. Epilepsy Behav 2009;14:167–71. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.09.029 PubMed DOI
Feinstein A, Stergiopoulos V, Fine J, et al. . Psychiatric outcome in patients with a psychogenic movement disorder: a prospective study. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2001;14:169–76. PubMed
Rawlings GH, Brown I, Reuber M. Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2017;68:153–8. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.10.035 PubMed DOI
Williams IA, Howlett S, Levita L, et al. . Changes in emotion processing following brief augmented Psychodynamic interpersonal therapy for functional neurological symptoms. Behav Cogn Psychother 2018;46:350–66. 10.1017/S1352465817000807 PubMed DOI
Pick S, Goldstein LH, Perez DL, et al. . Emotional processing in functional neurological disorder: a review, biopsychosocial model and research agenda. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019;90:704–11. 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319201 PubMed DOI PMC
Reuber M, Mitchell AJ, Howlett S, et al. . Measuring outcome in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: how relevant is seizure remission? Epilepsia 2005;46:1788–95. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00280.x PubMed DOI
Jones B, Reuber M, Norman P. Correlates of health-related quality of life in adults with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a systematic review. Epilepsia 2016;57:171–81. 10.1111/epi.13268 PubMed DOI
Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, et al. . Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 2012;13:132 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132 PubMed DOI PMC
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PubMed DOI PMC
Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, et al. . Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health 2018;6:149 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 PubMed DOI PMC
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. . COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018;27:1147–57. 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 PubMed DOI PMC
Prinsen CAC, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al. . How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline. Trials 2016;17:449 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. . COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018;27:1171–9. 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4 PubMed DOI PMC
Hinson VK, Cubo E, Comella CL, et al. . Rating scale for psychogenic movement disorders: scale development and Clinimetric testing. Mov Disord 2005;20:1592–7. 10.1002/mds.20650 PubMed DOI
Nielsen G, Ricciardi L, Meppelink AM, et al. . A simplified version of the psychogenic movement disorders rating scale: the simplified functional movement disorders rating scale (S-FMDRS). Mov Disord Clin Pract 2017;4:710–6. 10.1002/mdc3.12475 PubMed DOI PMC
Cianci V, Ferlazzo E, Condino F, et al. . Rating scale for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: scale development and Clinimetric testing. Epilepsy Behav 2011;21:128–31. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.03.025 PubMed DOI
Sarfraz N, Ijaz T. Development of conversion disorder scale for children. J Behav Sci 2014;24:44–56.
Ijaz T, Nasir A, Sarfraz N, et al. . Psychometric properties of conversion disorder Scale- revised (CdS) for children. J Pak Med Assoc 2017;67:725–30. PubMed
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. . The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539–49. 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 PubMed DOI PMC
Ataoglu A, Ozcetin A, Icmeli C, et al. . Paradoxical therapy in conversion reaction. J Korean Med Sci 2003;18:581–4. 10.3346/jkms.2003.18.4.581 PubMed DOI PMC
Drane DL, LaRoche SM, Ganesh GA, et al. . A standardized diagnostic approach and ongoing feedback improves outcome in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2016;54:34–9. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.10.026 PubMed DOI
Goldstein LH, Chalder T, Chigwedere C, et al. . Cognitive-Behavioral therapy for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a pilot RCT. Neurology 2010;74:1986–94. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e39658 PubMed DOI PMC
Goldstein LH, Mellers JDC, Landau S, et al. . Cognitive behavioural therapy vs standardised medical care for adults with dissociative non-epileptic seizures (codes): a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Neurol 2015;15:98 10.1186/s12883-015-0350-0 PubMed DOI PMC
LaFrance WC, Keitner GI, Papandonatos GD, et al. . Pilot pharmacologic randomized controlled trial for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Neurology 2010;75:1166–73. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f4d5a9 PubMed DOI PMC
Khattak T, Farooq S, Jan B. Behavior therapy in dissociative convulsions disorder. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2006;16:359–63. PubMed
Oto M, Espie CA, Duncan R. An exploratory randomized controlled trial of immediate versus delayed withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic attacks (PNEAs). Epilepsia 2010;51:1994–9. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02696.x PubMed DOI
Chen DK, Maheshwari A, Franks R, et al. . Brief group psychoeducation for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a neurologist-initiated program in an epilepsy center. Epilepsia 2014;55:156–66. 10.1111/epi.12481 PubMed DOI
Guy W. US dept health, education and welfare publication (ADM) 76-338. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, 1976: 218–22.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med 2002;64:258–66. 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008 PubMed DOI
Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R: symptom Checklist-90-R: administration, scoring, and procedures manual. NCS Pearson 1996.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–70. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x PubMed DOI
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck depression inventory-II. Pearson 1996.
Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, et al. . An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:893–7. 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893 PubMed DOI
Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960;23:56–62. 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 PubMed DOI PMC
Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959;32:50–5. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x PubMed DOI
Bernstein EVEM, Putnam FW. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986;174:727–35. 10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004 PubMed DOI
Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–33. PubMed
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The mos 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83. PubMed
Cramer JA, Perrine K, Devinsky O, et al. . Development and cross-cultural translations of a 31-Item quality of life in epilepsy inventory. Epilepsia 1998;39:81–8. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01278.x PubMed DOI
Cramer JA, Perrine K, Devinsky O, et al. . A brief questionnaire to screen for quality of life in epilepsy the QOLIE-10. Epilepsia 1996;37:577–82. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00612.x PubMed DOI
Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. . The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:461–4. 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461 PubMed DOI
American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders - fourth edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
Attention impairment in motor functional neurological disorders: a neuropsychological study
Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda