Psychometric testing of perceived implicit rationing of nursing care (PIRNCA)
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
32180252
DOI
10.1111/jan.14351
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- PIRNCA instrument, Rasch analysis, faculty hospitals, nurses, psychometric properties, rationing of care, university hospitals,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ošetřovatelská péče organizace a řízení statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- personál sesterský nemocniční organizace a řízení statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- přidělování zdravotní péče organizace a řízení statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- psychometrie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- sociální validita - výzkum * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Slovenská republika MeSH
AIMS: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care (PIRNCA) instrument and to report the prevalence of rationed care at university and faculty hospitals. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study was carried out at two university and five faculty hospitals in the Slovak Republic. Participants were 895 Registered Nurses recruited by the purposive sampling method between December 2017-July 2018. Data were collected using the PIRNCA instrument. Construct validity and reliability of the instrument were tested. RESULTS: The prevalence of rationed care at university and faculty hospitals was identified as being 42.1%. Furthermore, 87.6% of nurses reported rationing one or more nursing care activities. Using both statistical methods when evaluating the PIRNCA resulted in the confirmation that the tool is valid and reliable. CONCLUSION: Rationed care is a common phenomenon at university and faculty hospitals. The PIRNCA is a suitable instrument to measure the phenomenon in adult acute care units because of its high reliability and validity. We recommend using the instrument in different contexts, not only for specific conditions that were presented for this study. IMPACT: Rationed care at university and faculty hospitals has never been reported. Psychometric properties of the instrument that measures nurses´ perception of rationed care have never been evaluated by using different approaches. The most frequently rationed nursing care activities are those that nurses are competent to initiate on the basis of their knowledge and skills - the independent ones. The PIRNCA is a valid and reliable instrument. Hospital management can use the instrument to explore the prevalence of rationed care, followed by the application of prevention strategies. Our findings represent the base for further exploration of rationed care using the PIRNCA.
目的: 评价感知式内隐护理配给(PIRNCA)工具的心理测量特性,并汇报大学和学院附属医院的配给护理情况。 设计: 横断面研究。 方法: 在斯洛伐克共和国的两所大学和五所学院附属医院进行此项研究。受试者为895名注册护士(于2017年12月至2018年7月采用目的抽样法招募)。采用感知式内隐护理配给工具来收集数据。检验了该工具的结构效度和信度。 结果: 大学和学院附属医院的配给式护理普及率被确定为42.1%。此外,87.6%的护士汇报了一次或多次配给式护理活动。在评估感知式内隐护理配给时,采用这两种统计方法,可以确认工具是有效的、可靠的。 结论: 在大学和学院附属医院,配给式护理是一种普遍现象。由于具有较高的信度和效度,感知式内隐护理配给工具可用于测量成人急症监护室中这类现象。我们建议在不同的环境中使用该工具,而不仅仅是针对本研究中提出的特定条件。 影响: 从未报道过大学和学院附属医院的配给式护理现象。从未使用不同方法评价心理测量特性工具(该工具用于计量护士对配给式护理的感知情况)。最常见的配给式护理活动是护士有能力根据他们的知识和技能发起的活动(独立活动)。感知式内隐护理配给是一种有效且可靠的工具。医院管理人员可以利用这一工具来探讨配给式护理的普及情况,然后施行预防策略。研究成果为采用感知式内隐护理配给工具进一步探索配给式护理奠定了基础。.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Turku Turku Finland
Department of Nursing Faculty of Health Sciences Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Nursing Science University of Turku Turku Finland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
Cho, E., Lee, N.-J., Kim, E.-Y., Kim, S., Lee, K., Park, K.-O., & Sung, Y. H. (2016). Nurse staffing level and overtime associated with patient safety, quality of care and care left undone in hospitals: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 60(2016), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.05.009
Dhaini, S. R., Zúñiga, F., Ausserhofer, D., Simon, M., Kunz, R., De Geest, S., & Schwendimann, R. (2017). Are nursing home care workers’ health and presenteeism associated with implicit rationing of care? A cross-sectional multi-site Study. Geriatric Nursing, 38(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.07.003
Gurková, E., Adamkovič, M., Jones, T., Kurucová, R., Kalánková, D., & Žiaková, K. (2019). Factor analysis, validity of the Perceived implicit rationing of nursing care instrument and prevalence, patterns of unfinished nursing care in Slovakia. Journal of Nursing Management, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12887
Gurková, E., Zeleníková, R., & Žiaková, K. (2018). Rationing/missed/unfinished nursing care and patient safety in Slovakia - a pilot study. Conference proceedings: Profesionalita v ošetřovatelství III/1 (pp. 26-28). Olomouc, Czech Rpublik: Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University in Olomouc.
Herlitz, A. (2016). The limited impact of indeterminacy for healthcare rationing: How indeterminacy problems show the need for a hybrid theory, but nothing more. Journal of Medical Ethics, 42(1), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-102937
Jones, T. L. (2014). Validation of the perceived implicit rationing of nursing care (PIRNCA) instrument. Nursing Forum, 49(2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12076
Jones, T. L. (2015). A descriptive analysis of implicit rationing of nursing care: Frequency and patterns in Texas. Nursing Economics, 33(3), 144-154.
Jones, T. L., Gemeinhardt, G., Thompson, J. A., & Hamilton, P. (2016). Measuring unfinished nursing care: What to consider when choosing and scoring surveys. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 31(1), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000143
Jones, T. L., Hamilton, P., & Murry, N. (2015). Unfinished nursing care, missed care, and implicitly rationed care: State of the science review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(6), 1121-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.012
Kalánková, D., Gurková, E., Zeleníková, R., & Žiaková, K. (2019). Application of measuring tools in the assessment of the phenomenon of rationing/missed/unfinished care. Kontakt, 21(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2018.001
Kalisch, B. J., & Williams, R. A. (2009). Development and psychometric testing of a tool to measure missed nursing care. Journal of Nursing Administration, 39(5), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181a23cf5
Kottorp, A., Bernspång, B., & Fisher, A. G. (2003). Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(Pt 8), 597-605. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00475.x
Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
Papastavrou, E., Andreou, P., & Efstathiou, G. (2014). Rationing of nursing care and nurse-patient outcomes: A systematic review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 29(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2160
Patomella, A. H., Tham, K., & Kottorp, A. (2005). P-drive: Assessment of driving performance after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(5), 273-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970600632594
Raiche, G. (2005). Critical eigenvalue sizes in standardized residual principal component analysis. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19, 1012.
Rochefort, C. M., & Clarke, S. P. (2010). Nurses’ work environments, care rationing, job outcomes and quality of care on neonatal units. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(10), 2213-2224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05376.x
Rochefort, C. M., Ratwell, B. A., & Clarke, S. P. (2016). Rationing of nursing care interventions and its association with nurse-reported outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Nursing, 2016(15), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0169-z
Schubert, M., Ausserhofer, D., Desmedt, M., Schwendimann, R., Lesaffre, E., Li, B., & De Geest, S. (2013). Levels and correlated of implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss acute care hospitals - a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(2), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.016
Schubert, M., Clarke, S. P., Aiken, L. H., & De Geest, S. (2012). Associations between rationing of nursing care and inpatient mortality in Swiss hospitals. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 24(3), 230-238. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzs009
Schubert, M., Clarke, S. P., Glass, T. R., Schaffert-Witvliet, B., & De Geest, S. (2009). Identifying thresholds for relationships between impacts of rationing of nursing care and nurse- and patient-reported outcomes in Swiss hospitals: A correlational study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(7), 884-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.008
Schubert, M., Glass, T. R., Clarke, S. P., Aiken, L. H., Schaffert-Witvliet, B., Sloane, D. M., & De Geest, S. (2008). Rationing of nursing care and its relationship to patient outcomes: The Swiss extension of the International Hospital Outcomes Study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(4), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzn017
Schubert, M., Glass, T. R., Clarke, S. P., Schaffert-Witvliet, B., & De Geest, S. (2007). Validation of the Basel extent of rationing of nursing care instrument. Nursing Research, 56(6), 416-424. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000299853.52429.62
Scott, A. P., Harvey, C., Felzmann, H., Suhonen, R., Habermann, M., Halvorsen, K., … Papastavrou, E. (2018). Resource allocation and rationing in nursing care: A discussion paper. Nursing Ethics, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733018759831
Smith, R. M., & Miao, C. Y. (1994). Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice (p. 1994). Greenwich: Ablex.
Strech, D., & Danis, M. (2014). How can bedside rationing be justified despite coexisting inefficiency? The need for ‘benchmarks of efficiency’. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(2), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100769
Suhonen, R., Stolt, M., Habermann, M., Hjatadottir, I., Vryonides, S., Tonnessen, S., … Scott, P. A. (2018). Ethical elements in priority setting in nursing care: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 88(2018), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.006
Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis and Rheumatism, 57(8), 1358-1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108
VanFosson, C. A., Jones, T. L., & Yoder, L. H. (2018). Monthly variation of unfinished nursing care at the US Army Burn Center. Burns, 44(8), 1910-1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.008
Williams, R. G. A. (1980). Rationing: How it is done with community services for the older disabled. International Rehabilitation Medicine, 2(4), 160-166.
Zeleníková, R., Gurková, E., Friganovic, A., Uchmanowicz, I., Jarošová, D., Žiaková, K., … Papastvarou, E. (2019). Unfinished nursing care in four central European countries. Journal of Nursing Management, 2019(00), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12896
Zúñiga, F., Ausserhofer, D., Hamers, J. P. H., Engberg, S., Simon, M., & Schwendimann, R. (2015). The relationship of staffing and work environment with implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss nursing homes - A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(9), 1463-1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.05.005
Zúñiga, F., Schubert, M., Hamers, J. P. H., Simon, M., Schwendimann, R., Engberg, S., & Ausserhofer, D. (2016). Evidence on the validity and reliability of the German, French and Italian nursing home version of the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care instrument. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(8), 1948-1963. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12975