The prognostic value of the urokinase-plasminogen activator system (uPA) in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC)
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
32209281
DOI
10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.002
PII: S1078-1439(20)30043-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Bladder cancer, PAI-1, Radical cystectomy, uPA, uPAR,
- MeSH
- aktivátor plazminogenu urokinázového typu analýza fyziologie MeSH
- cystektomie * metody MeSH
- inhibitor aktivátoru plazminogenu 1 analýza fyziologie MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře chemie mortalita chirurgie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- receptory urokinázového aktivátoru plazminogenu analýza fyziologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- aktivátor plazminogenu urokinázového typu MeSH
- inhibitor aktivátoru plazminogenu 1 MeSH
- PLAUR protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- receptory urokinázového aktivátoru plazminogenu MeSH
PURPOSE: Urokinase-plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR), and the plasmin-activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) have been associated with oncologic outcomes in various malignancies and could help identify bladder cancer (BC) patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) who are likely to benefit from intensification of therapy to prevent disease progression. Our aim was to assess the value of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 for prognosticating survival outcomes of patients treated with RC for BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumor specimens from 272 consecutive patients treated with RC for advanced BC were assessed with immunohistochemical staining for uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1. Overexpression was assessed by pathological image analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox-regression were used to analyze survival. Harrell's C-index was used to assess for clinical impact of the uPA system. RESULTS: uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 were overexpressed in 48.2%, 51.1%, and 52.2% of patients, respectively. uPA overexpression was associated with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.034) and nodal status (P = 0.013); PAI-1 overexpression was associated with primary muscle-invasive BC (P = 0.015) and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.024). uPA, uPAR, and the number of overexpressed markers were all 3 significantly associated with shorter overall recurrence-free-, distant recurrence-free-, and cancer-specific survival. In multivariable analyses, uPA overexpression remained associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.79; P = 0.036) in the entire cohort, in patients without lymph node metastasis (HR = 1.98; P = 0.018) and those with nonorgan-confined disease (HR = 1.98; P = 0.022). uPAR overexpression was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival in patients without lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.01; P = 0.021) and those with organ-confined disease (HR = 4.11; P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Members of the uPA system are associated with features of biologically aggressive BC and oncologic outcomes. However, their value beyond currently available information remains limited.
Department of Gynecology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Pathology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Medical University of Hamburg Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal QC Canada
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org