Environmental pressures on stomatal size may drive plant genome size evolution: evidence from a natural experiment with Cape geophytes

. 2020 Jul 24 ; 126 (2) : 323-330.

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32474609

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The idea that genome (size) evolution in eukaryotes could be driven by environmental factors is still vigorously debated. In extant plants, genome size correlates positively with stomatal size, leading to the idea that conditions enabling the existence of large stomata in fossil plants also supported growth of their genome size. We test this inductive assumption in drought-adapted, prostrate-leaved Cape (South Africa) geophytes where, compared with their upright-leaved geophytic ancestors, stomata develop in a favourably humid microclimate formed underneath their leaves. METHODS: Stomatal parameters (leaf cuticle imprints) and genome size (flow cytometry) were measured in 16 closely related geophytic species pairs from seven plant families. In each pair, representing a different genus, we contrasted a prostrate-leaved species with its upright-leaved phylogenetic relative, the latter whose stomata are exposed to the ambient arid climate. KEY RESULTS: Except for one, all prostrate-leaves species had larger stomata, and in 13 of 16 pairs they also had larger genomes than their upright-leaved relatives. Stomatal density and theoretical maximum conductance were less in prostrate-leaved species with small guard cells (<1 pL) but showed no systematic difference in species pairs with larger guard cells (>1 pL). Giant stomata were observed in the prostrate-leaved Satyrium bicorne (89-137 µm long), despite its relatively small genome (2C = 9 Gbp). CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that climate, through selection on stomatal size, might be able to drive genome size evolution in plants. The data support the idea that plants from 'greenhouse' geological periods with large stomata might have generally had larger genome sizes when compared with extant plants, though this might not have been solely due to higher atmospheric CO2 in these periods but could also have been due to humid conditions prevailing at fossil deposit sites.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Barow M. 2006. Endopolyploidy in seed plants. Bioessays 28: 271–281. PubMed

Beaulieu JM, Leitch IJ, Patel S, Pendharkar A, Knight CA. 2008. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytologist 179: 975–986. PubMed

Bennett MD. 1987. Variation in genomic form in plants and its ecological implications. New Phytologist 106(Suppl.): 177–200.

Bennetzen JL, Ma J, Devos KM. 2005. Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 95: 127–132. PubMed PMC

de Boer HJ, Price CA, Wagner-Cremer F, Dekker SC, Franks PJ, Veneklaas EJ. 2016. Optimal allocation of leaf epidermal area for gas exchange. New Phytologist 210: 1219–1228. PubMed PMC

Cavalier-Smith T. 2005. Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Annals of Botany 95: 147–175. PubMed PMC

Cramer MD, Kleizen C, Morrow C. 2007. Does the prostrate-leaved geophyte Brunsvigia orientalis utilize soil-derived CO2 for photosynthesis? Annals of Botany 99: 835–844. PubMed PMC

Doheny-Adams T, Hunt L, Franks PJ, Beerling DJ, Gray JE. 2012. Genetic manipulation of stomatal density influences stomatal size, plant growth and tolerance to restricted water supply across a growth carbon dioxide gradient. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 547–555. PubMed PMC

Edwards D, Kerp H, Hass H. 1998. Stomata in early land plants: an anatomical and ecophysiological approach. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 255–278.

Esler KJ, Rundel PW, Vorster P. 1999. Biogeography of prostrate-leaved geophytes in semi-arid South Africa: hypotheses on functionality. Plant Ecology 142: 105–120.

Frakes LA, Francis JE, Syktus JI. 1992. Climate modes of the Phanerozoic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Franks PJ, Beerling DJ. 2009. Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effect on stomatal size and density. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 10343–10347. PubMed PMC

Franks PJ, Drake PL, Beerling DJ. 2009. Plasticity in maximum stomatal conductance constrained by negative correlation between stomatal size and density: an analysis using Eucalyptus globulus. Plant, Cell & Environment 32: 1737–1748. PubMed

Franks PJ, Freckleton RP, Beaulieu JM, Leitch IJ, Beerling DJ. 2012a Megacycles of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration correlate with fossil plant genome size. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 556–564. PubMed PMC

Franks PJ, Leitch IJ, Ruszala EM, Hetherington AM, Beerling DJ. 2012b Physiological framework for adaptation of stomata to CO2 from glacial to future concentrations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 537–546. PubMed PMC

Franks PJ, Royer DL, Beerling DJ, et al. . 2014. New constraints on atmospheric CO2 concentration for the Phanerozoic. Geophysical Research Letters 41: 4685–4694.

Gregory RT, ed.2005. The evolution of the genome. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Gregory TR, Nicol JA, Tamm H, et al. . 2007. Eukaryotic genome size databases. Nucleic Acids Research 35: D332–D338. PubMed PMC

Grover CE, Wendel JF. 2010. Recent insights into mechanisms of genome size change in plants. Journal of Botany 2010. 382732.

Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424: 901–908. PubMed

Hidalgo O, Pellicer J, Christenhusz M, Schneider H, Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. 2017. Is there an upper limit to genome size? Trends in Plant Science 22: 567–573. PubMed

Hodgson JG, Sharafi M, Jalili A, et al. . 2010. Stomatal vs. genome size in angiosperms: the somatic tail wagging the genomic dog? Annals of Botany 105: 573–584. PubMed PMC

Hoffmann V, Verboom GA, Cotterill FP. 2015. Dated plant phylogenies resolve Neogene climate and landscape evolution in the Cape Floristic Region. PLoS One 10: e0137847. PubMed PMC

Jiao Y, Liu Y-H, Song S-Y. 1999. Characteristics of the cuticle in Marattiales. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 21: 329–332.

Jordan GJ, Carpenter RJ, Koutoulis A, Price A, Brodribb TJ. 2015. Environmental adaptation in stomatal size independent of the effects of genome size. New Phytologist 205: 608–617. PubMed PMC

Katagiri Y, Hasegawa J, Fujikura U, Hoshino R, Matsunaga S, Tsukaya H. 2016. The coordination of ploidy and cell size differs between cell layers in leaves. Development 143: 1120–1125. PubMed PMC

Knight CA, Molinari NA, Petrov DA. 2005. The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype. Annals of Botany 95: 177–190. PubMed PMC

Kurzweil H, Linder H, Stern W, Pridgeon AM. 1995. Comparative vegetative anatomy and classification of Diseae (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 117: 171–220.

Lawson T, McElwain JC. 2016. Evolutionary trade-offs in stomatal spacing. New Phytologist 210: 1149–1151. PubMed

Lawson T, Vialet-Chabrand S. 2019. Speedy stomata, photosynthesis and plant water use efficiency. New Phytologist 221: 93–98. PubMed

Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. 2012. Ecological and genetic factors linked to contrasting genome dynamics in seed plants. New Phytologist 194: 629–646. PubMed

Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. 2013. Genome size diversity and evolution in land plants. In: Leitch IJ, Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Wendel J, eds. Plant genome diversity, Vol. 2 Wien: Springer, 307–322.

Leitch IJ, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD. 2005. Evolution of DNA amounts across land plants (embryophyta). Annals of Botany 95: 207–217. PubMed PMC

Linder HP. 2003. The radiation of the Cape flora, South Africa. Biological Reviews 78: 597–638. PubMed

Lomax BH, Hilton J, Bateman RM, et al. . 2014. Reconstructing relative genome size of vascular plants through geological time. New Phytologist 201: 636–644. PubMed

Lynch M. 2007. The origin of genome architecture. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Manning JC, Goldblatt P, Snijman D. 2002. The color encyclopedia of Cape bulbs. Portland, OR: Timber Press.

Manning JC, Goldblatt P. 2012. Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region 1: the core Cape flora. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.

Masterson J. 1994. Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264: 421–424. PubMed

McElwain JC, Yiotis C, Lawson T. 2016. Using modern plant trait relationships between observed and theoretical maximum stomatal conductance and vein density to examine patterns of plant macroevolution. New Phytologist 209: 94–103. PubMed PMC

Meckel T, Gall L, Semrau S, Homann U, Thiel G. 2007. Guard cells elongate: relationship of volume and surface area during stomatal movement. Biophysical Journal 92: 1072–1080. PubMed PMC

Mucina L, Rutherford MC, eds.2006. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.

Nadeau JA, Sack FD. 2002. Control of stomatal distribution on the Arabidopsis leaf surface. Science 296: 1697–1700. PubMed

Ohri D. 2005. Climate and growth form: the consequences for genome size in plants. Plant Biology 7: 449–458. PubMed

Oliver MJ, Petrov D, Ackerly D, Falkowski P, Schofield OM. 2007. The mode and tempo of genome size evolution in eukaryotes. Genome Research 17: 594–601. PubMed PMC

Pellicer J, Fay MF, Leitch IJ. 2010. The largest eukaryotic genome of them all? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 164: 10–15.

Petrov DA. 2001. Evolution of genome size: new approaches to an old problem. Trends in Genetics 17: 23–28. PubMed

Procheş S, Cowling RM, du Preez DR. 2005. Patterns of geophyte diversity and storage organ size in the winter-rainfall region of southern Africa. Diversity and Distributions 11: 101–109.

Raven JA. 2014. Speedy small stomata? Journal of Experimental Botany 65: 1415–1424. PubMed

R Core Team 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; http://www.R-project.org/.

Royer DL, Berner RA, Montanes IP, Tabor NJ, Beerling DJ. 2004. CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate. GSA Today 14: 4–10.

Royer DL. 2001. Stomatal density and stomatal index as indicators of paleoatmospheric CO2 concentration. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 114: 1–28. PubMed

Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. . 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 676–682. PubMed PMC

Schubert I, Vu GTH. 2016. Genome stability and evolution: attempting a holistic view. Trends in Plant Science 21: 749–757. PubMed

Singh H. 1981. Development and organization of stomata in Orchidaceae. Acta Botanica Indica 9: 94–100.

Slavík B. 1974. Methods of studying plant water relations. Praha, Czech Republic: Academia.

Šmarda P, Bureš P. 2010. Understanding intraspecific variation in genome size in plants. Preslia 82: 41–61.

Šmarda P, Bureš P, Horová L, et al. . 2014. Ecological and evolutionary significance of genomic GC content diversity in monocots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111: E4096–E4102. PubMed PMC

Stern WL. 2014. Anatomy of the monocotyledons. Vol. 10. Orchidaceae. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Sun Y, Yan F, Cui X, Liu F. 2014. Plasticity in stomatal size and density of potato leaves under different irrigation and phosphorus regimes. Journal of Plant Physiology 171: 1248–1255. PubMed

Taylor TN, Taylor EL, Krings M. 2009. Paleobotany. The biology and evolution of fossil plants. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Tichá I. 1982. Photosynthetic characteristics during ontogenesis of leaves 7. Stomata density and sizes. Photosynthetica 16: 375–471.

Trávníček P, Ponert J, Urfus T, et al. . 2015. Challenges of flow-cytometric estimation of nuclear genome size in orchids, a plant group with both whole-genome and progressively partial endoreplication. Cytometry 87A: 958–966. PubMed

Verboom GA, Archibald JK, Bakker FT, et al. . 2009. Origin and diversification of the Greater Cape flora: ancient species repository, hot-bed of recent radiation, or both? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51: 44–53. PubMed

Veselý P, Bureš P, Šmarda P, Pavlíček T. 2012. Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology? Annals of Botany 109: 65–75. PubMed PMC

Vinogradov AE. 2003. Selfish DNA is maladaptive: evidence from the plant Red List. Trends in Genetics 19: 609–614. PubMed

Vinogradov AE. 2004. Evolution of genome size: multilevel selection, mutation bias or dynamical chaos? Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 14: 620–626. PubMed

Wang R, Yu G, He N, et al. . 2015. Latitudinal variation of leaf stomatal traits from species to community level in forests: linkage with ecosystem productivity. Scientific Reports 5: 14454. PubMed PMC

Willmer C, Fricker M. 1996. Stomata. London: Chapman & Hall.

Zalenskii V. 1904. Materials for the study of the quantitative anatomy of different leaves of the same plant. Izvestija Kievskogo Politechničeskogo Instituta 4: 1–203. [in Russian]

Zarinkamar F. 2006. Density, size and distribution of stomata in different monocotyledons. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 9: 1650–1659.

Zarinkamar F. 2007. Stomatal observations in dicotyledons. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10: 199–219. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...