Bacteria but not fungi respond to soil acidification rapidly and consistently in both a spruce and beech forest
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
32815987
DOI
10.1093/femsec/fiaa174
PII: 5894924
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- amplicon sequencing, forest soil, soil acidification, soil bacteria, soil enzymatic activity, soil fungi,
- MeSH
- Bacteria genetika MeSH
- buk (rod) * MeSH
- dusík analýza MeSH
- houby MeSH
- koncentrace vodíkových iontů MeSH
- lesy MeSH
- půda * MeSH
- půdní mikrobiologie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Norsko MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dusík MeSH
- půda * MeSH
Anthropogenically enhanced atmospheric sulphur (S) and nitrogen (N) deposition has acidified and eutrophied forest ecosystems worldwide. However, both S and N mechanisms have an impact on microbial communities and the consequences for microbially driven soil functioning differ. We conducted a two-forest stand (Norway spruce and European beech) field experiment involving acidification (sulphuric acid addition) and N (ammonium nitrate) loading and their combination. For 4 years, we monitored separate responses of soil microbial communities to the treatments and investigated the relationship to changes in the activity of extracellular enzymes. We observed that acidification selected for acidotolerant and oligotrophic taxa of Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria decreased bacterial community richness and diversity in both stands in parallel, disregarding their original dissimilarities in soil chemistry and composition of microbial communities. The shifts in bacterial community influenced the stoichiometry and magnitude of enzymatic activity. The bacterial response to experimental N addition was much weaker, likely due to historically enhanced N availability. Fungi were not influenced by any treatment during 4-year manipulation. We suggest that in the onset of acidification when fungi remain irresponsive, bacterial reaction might govern the changes in soil enzymatic activity.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org