During the COVID-19 pandemic, we are witnessing a surge of nationalism throughout an ostensibly globalized world. In this article, we focus on the "narrative battle" over COVID-19 that has escalated between two competing major powers - China and the US. Guided by a cultural sociological approach, we reveal the meaning-making processes behind the narrative battle through in-depth, hermeneutical reconstruction of the "reactive performance" of each country, as articulated in political speeches and mass media. We point out that, in the Chinese narrative, the country emerges from a "century of humiliation," becoming a major world power that will no longer be subject to the "bullying" of the West. In the US narrative, even though Trump initially highlights the country's "very good" relationship with China, as the storyline unfolds, China is blamed for the global pandemic, assuming again the role of a dangerous actor on the world stage. Our research shows that the current reactive communicative mechanism is not only unsustainable, but also dangerous in times of crisis. We suggest that recognition of the narrative battle and acknowledgement of its performative function in the public sphere is the first step toward mutual understanding and meaningful dialogue between these two world powers.

Department of Asian Studies Palacky University Křížkovského 14 779 00 Olomouc Czech Republic

Masaryk University 601 77 Brno Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Alexander JC. Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological Theory. 2004;22(4):527–573. doi: 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00233.x. DOI

Alexander JC. Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. In: Alexander JC, Giesen B, Mast JL, editors. Social performance: Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 29–90.

Alexander JC. Afterword. Nations and Nationalism. 2013;19(4):693–695. doi: 10.1111/nana.12041. DOI

Alexander JC, Smith P. The meanings of social life, Jeffrey C. Alexander. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. The strong program in cultural sociology: Elements of a structural hermeneutics; pp. 11–26.

Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany. 2020. Democrats and republicans have argued about China for 150 years. Axios, April 29. Retrieved from https://www.axios.com/republicans-democrats-argue-china-election-4416f23e-95b6-4fd3-bc14-7d60c910ce86.html. Accessed 30 June 2020.

Amighini A. China dream: Still coming true? Novi Ligure: Edizioni Epoké; 2016.

Anderson B. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London: Verso; 1991.

Binder W. The drama of politics: Jeffrey Alexander’s liberal sociology of political performances. Thesis Eleven. 2017;142(1):112–129. doi: 10.1177/0725513617727904. DOI

Blanchard M-MF. A primer on China–US relations, 1949–2008: A friend in need is a friend indeed. In: Blanchard J-MF, Shen S, editors. Conflict and cooperation in Sino-US relations: Change and continuity, causes and cures. Abington and New York: Routledge; 2015. pp. 25–44.

Breuer A, Johnston AI. Memes, narratives and the emergent US–China security dilemma. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2019;32(4):429–455. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1622083. DOI

Brittingham MA. The “role” of nationalism in Chinese foreign policy: A reactive model of nationalism & conflict. Journal of Chinese Political Science. 2007;12(2):147–166. doi: 10.1007/s11366-007-9005-3. DOI

Bruun O, Jacobsen M. Human rights and Asian values: Contesting national identities and cultural representations in Asia. London: Routledge; 2000.

Chan, Steve. 2008. China, the U.S., and the power-transition theory: A critique. London and New York, Routledge.

Friedberg Aaron L. Ripe for rivalry: Prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia. International Security. 1993;18(3):5–33. doi: 10.2307/2539204. DOI

Friedman E. Reconstructing China’s national identity: A southern alternative to Mao-era anti-imperialist nationalism. The Journal of Asian Studies. 1994;53(1):67–91. doi: 10.2307/2059527. DOI

Frye N. Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1957.

Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books; 1973.

Glaser BG. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1978.

Hall S. In: Introduction. In Paper voices: The popular press and social change 1935–1965. Smith ACH, Immirzi E, Blackwell T, editors. London: Chatto and Windus; 1975.

Hall S. The question of cultural identity. In: Hall S, Held D, Hubert D, Thompson K, editors. Modernity: An introduction to modern societies. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 1996. pp. 595–634.

Hutcheson J, Domke D, Billeaudeaux A, Garland P. US national identity, political elites, and a patriotic press following September 11. Political Communication. 2004;21(1):27–50. doi: 10.1080/10584600490273254. DOI

Ikenberry, G. John. 2008. The rise of China and the future of the west: Can the liberal system survive? Foreign Affair January/February 2008. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2008-01-01/rise-china-and-future-west. Accessed 8 August 2020.

In Chan S, Song W. Telling the China story well: A discursive approach to the analysis of Chinese foreign policy in the “belt and road” initiative. Chinese Political Science Review. 2020;5:417–437. doi: 10.1007/s41111-020-00146-1. DOI

James H. Deglobalization: The rise of disembedded unilateralism. Annual Review of Financial Economics. 2018;10:219–237. doi: 10.1146/annurev-financial-110217-022625. DOI

Jerdėn B. The assertive China narrative: Why it is wrong and how so many still bought into it. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2014;7(1):47–88. doi: 10.1093/cjip/pot019. DOI

Kil SH. Fearing yellow, imagining white: Media analysis of the Chinese exclusion act of 1882. Social Identities. 2012;18(6):663–677. doi: 10.1080/13504630.2012.708995. DOI

Lampton DM. A new type of major-power relationship: Seeking a durable foundation for US-China ties. Asia Policy. 2013;16:51–68. doi: 10.1353/asp.2013.0025. DOI

Latham AA. China in the contemporary American geopolitical imagination. Asian Affairs: An American Review. 2001;28(3):138–145. doi: 10.1080/00927670109601492. DOI

Liff AP, John Ikenberry G. Racing toward tragedy? China’s rise, military competition in the Asia Pacific, and the security dilemma. International Security. 2014;39(2):52–91. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00176. DOI

Lisk, Franklyn and Annamarie Bindenagel Šehović. 2020. Rethinking global health governance in a changing world order for achieving sustainable development: The role and potential of the “Rising Powers” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 13 (1): 45–65

McLuhan M, Fiore Q, Agel J. The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects. New York: Bantam Books; 1967.

Mearsheimer J. The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia. International Politics. 2010;3(4):381–396.

Nye, Joseph S. 2018. A time for positive-sum power. Wilson Quarterly Fall 2018. https://www.wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/the-fate-of-the-international-order/a-time-for-positive-sum-power/. Accessed 8 August 2020.

Rapley T. Sampling strategies in qualitative research. In: Flick U, editor. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. Dorchester: Henry Ling Limited; 2014. pp. 49–64.

Reilly J. Strong society, smart state: The rise of public opinion in China’s Japan policy. New York: Columbia University Press; 2012.

Reny, Tyler T., and Matt A. Barreto. 2020. Xenophobia in the time of pandemic: Othering, anti-Asian attitudes, and COVID-19. Politics, Groups, and Identities: 1–24. 10.1080/21565503.2020.1769693.

Scherzer, Robert and Eric Taylor Woods. 2020. How nationalism can be a force for good in the struggle against Covid-19. USApp-American Politics and Policy Blog. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/104406/. Accessed 10 July 2020.

Scheuerman, William. 2018. Globalization. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (winter), ed. Edward N. Zalta, Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/globalization/. Accessed 30 June 2020.

Smith P. Why war? The cultural logic of Iraq, the Gulf war, and Suez. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.

Sutter RG. US-China relations: Perilous past, uncertain present. 3. Landham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2018.

Timmermans S, Tavory I. Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory. 2012;30(3):167–186. doi: 10.1177/0735275112457914. DOI

Tisdall, Simon. 2020. Power, equality, nationalism: How the pandemic will reshape the world. The Guardian, March 28. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/28/power-equality-nationalism-how-the-pandemic-will-reshape-the-world. Accessed 13 June 2020.

Turcsányi RQ. Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea: Power sources, domestic politics, and reactive foreign policy. Cham: Springer; 2018.

Walt, Stephen M. 2020. How the world will look after the coronavirus pandemic. Foreign Policy, March 20. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/20/world-order-after-coroanvirus-pandemic/. Accessed 2 June 2020.

Wang Z. Never forget national humiliation: Historical memory in Chinese politics and foreign relations. New York: Columbia University Press; 2012.

Wang Z, Zeng J. From economic cooperation to strategic competition: Understanding the US-China trade disputes through the transformed relations. Journal of Chinese Political Science. 2020;25(1):49–69. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09652-0. DOI

Weintraub, Rebecca, Asaf Bitton, and Mark L. Rosenberg. 2020. The danger of vaccine nationalism. Harvard Business Review, May 22. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2020/05/the-danger-of-vaccine-nationalism. Accessed 30 June 2020.

Xu B. Chinese populist nationalism: Its intellectual politics and moral dilemma. Representations. 2001;76(1):120–140. doi: 10.1525/rep.2001.76.1.120. DOI

Xu, Qinyi and Chuanjing Guan. 2020. Escalated policy space conflict: Tracing institutional contestations between China and the United States. Chinese Political Science Review.

Yacoub, Amin R. and Mohamed S. El-Zomor. 2020. Would COVID-19 be the turning point in history for the globalization era? The short-term and long-term impact of COVID-19 on globalization. April 6. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3570142 or 10.2139/ssrn.3570142. Accessed 10 July 2020.

Yu H. Glorious memories of imperial China and the rise of Chinese populist nationalism. Journal of Contemporary China. 2014;23(90):1174–1187. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2014.898907. DOI

Zeng J. Constructing a “new type of great power relations”: The state of debate in China (1998-2014) The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2016;18(2):422–442. doi: 10.1177/1369148115620991. DOI

Zhang, Chenchen. 2020. Covid-19 in China: From “Chernobyl moment” to impetus for nationalism. Made in China Journal, May 4. Retrieved from https://madeinchinajournal.com/2020/05/04/covid-19-in-china-from-chernobyl-moment-to-impetus-for-nationalism. Accessed 25 May 2020.

Everything's going according to Plan(demic): a cultural sociological approach to conspiracy theorizing

Diffusion of Influence? Detecting China's Footprint in Foreign Policies of Other Countries

Studying Chinese Foreign Policy Narratives: Introducing the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Press Conferences Corpus