A recent study published in Human Reproduction claimed that uterine lavage offers a non-surgical, minimally invasive strategy for the recovery of human embryos from fertile women who do not want or need IVF for medical reasons but who desire preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for embryos. To prove this hypothesis, the researchers recruited dozens of young Mexican women. The prospective oocyte donors underwent ovarian stimulation to induce the production of multiple mature oocytes. Subsequently, these women were inseminated by donor semen. A few days later, the developing embryos were collected by uterine lavage (uterine flushing) and subjected to genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Oocyte donors with persistently elevated hCG levels, indicating the implantation of one or more embryos after uterine lavage, had to undergo uterine curettage and/or treatment with methotrexate. A critical opinion paper discussing the aforementioned study was published by De Santis and colleagues and has raised critical issues that are largely technical in nature. However, this opinion paper neglects-from our point of view-critical issues of the Mexican study regarding ethical principles and moral standards in human research. These aspects are summarized below.

EuBios Centri Fivet Prof Zech Merano Italy

IVF Zentren Prof Zech Pilsen Pilsen Czech Republic

IVF Zentren Prof Zech Salzburg Salzburg Austria

Medical Department Kinderwunsch MVZ Ulm Ulm Germany

MVZ Kinderwunsch Münsterland Bocholt Germany

MVZ NEXTCLINICS Kinderwunschzentrum Köln Cologne Germany

NEXTCLINIC IVF Zentren Prof Zech Bregenz Bregenz Austria

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Munné S, Nakajima ST, Najmabadi S, Sauer MV, Angle MJ, Rivas JL, Mendieta LV, Macaso TM, Sawarkar S, Nadal A, Choudhary K, Nezhat C, Carson SA, Buster JE. First PGT-A using human in vivo blastocysts recovered by uterine lavage: comparison with matched IVF embryo controls. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:70–80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez242. PubMed DOI PMC

Oron G. How far should we go in the name of science? Hum Reprod. 2020;35:3–4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez249. PubMed DOI

Lambalk CB, Van Wely M, Kirkegaard K, De Geyter C. Ethics beyond ethics. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:1–2. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez250. PubMed DOI

De Santis L, Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Di Pietro C, Zuccarello D, Anastasi A, et al. IUI and uterine lavage of in vivo-produced blastocysts for PGT purposes: is it a technically and ethically reasonable perspective? Is it actually needed? J Assist Reprod Genet. 10.1007/s10815-020-01813-7In Press. PubMed PMC

Landy U, Darney PG. Pregnancy termination and potential psychiatric outcomes. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/pregnancy-termination-and-potential-psychiatric-outcomes . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Sorhaindo AM, Juárez-Ramírez C, Díaz Olavarrieta C, Aldaz E, Mejía Piñeros MC, Garcia S. Qualitative evidence on abortion stigma from Mexico City and five states in Mexico. Women Health. 2014;54:622–640. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2014.919983. PubMed DOI

Mexican News Daily. In at least 11 states, decriminalization of abortion not on the agenda. Available from: https://mexiconewsdaily.com/news/decriminalization-of-abortion-not-on-the-agenda/. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

WHO. Global Abortion Policies Database. https://abortion-policies.srhr.org/country/mexico/?zone=nayarit . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

CÓDIGO PENAL PARA EL ESTADO DE NAYARIT ÚLTIMA REFORMA PUBLICADA EN EL PERIÓDICO OFICIAL: 23 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2016. [N. DE E. CONTIENE LA FE DE ERRATAS PUBLICADA EN EL PERIÓDICO OFICIAL DEL 1 DE FEBRERO DE 2017. https://abortion-policies.srhr.org/documents/countries/12-Mexico-Nayarit-Penal-Code.pdf#page=111 . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Jares SE. A UCLA doctor, first to transplant human embryos, Offers Hope to Infertile Women https://people.com/archive/a-ucla-doctor-first-to-transplant-human-embryos-offers-hope-to-infertile-women-vol-20-no-6/ . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Nadal A, Najmabadi S, Addis B, Buster JE. Novel uterine lavage system for recovery of human embryos fertilized and matured in vivo. Med Devices (Auckl) 2019;12:133–141. PubMed PMC

Homedes N, Ugalde A. Health and ethical consequences of outsourcing pivotal clinical trials to Latin America: a cross-sectional, Descriptive Study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157756. PubMed DOI PMC

Germán NH, Rosemarie B. A survey in Mexico about ethics dumping in clinical research. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20:38. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0378-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Aguila E, Cervera MD, Martinez H, Weidmer BA. Norms and Regulations for Human-Subject Research in Mexico and the United States. In: Developing and Testing Informed-Consent Methods in a Study of the Elderly in Mexico. Rand cooperation. 2015. pp. 5–12 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt14bs1hg?refreqid=excelsior%3A23cc63fabeef613a1a5d32ae5732f7f2 Accessed 20 Jul 2020. DOI

Palacios-González C, Medina-Arellano MJ. Mitochondrial replacement techniques and Mexico's rule of law: on the legality of the first maternal spindle transfer case. J Law Biosci. 2017;4:50–69. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsw065. PubMed DOI PMC

Pennings G. Uterine lavage: ethics of research and clinical applications. Hum Reprod. 2020. 10.1093/humrep/deaa140. In Press. PubMed

CONSTITUCIÓN POLÍTICA DEL ESTADO LIBRE Y SOBERANO DE NAYARIT. http://tepic.gob.mx/archivos/transparencia/xxvii/constitucion_del_estado.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Pandya M, Desai C. Compensation in clinical research: the debate continues. Perspect Clin Res. 2013;4:70–74. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.106394. PubMed DOI PMC

Cook M. Ethical questions over IVF research outsourced to Mexico. BioEdge. 2020. https://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/ethical-questions-over-ivf-research-outsourced-to-mexico/13295. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans, Fourth Edition. 2016. https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Geo-Mexico, the geography and dynamics of modern Mexico. Poverty on the rise in some states in Mexico. 2014. ISSN: 1927–1549. https://geo-mexico.com/?p=10694 . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

The World Bank. Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines (% of population) – Mexico. The World Bank Group 2020. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.NAHC?end=2018&locations=MX&start=2016&view=chart . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Stein R. Embryo research to reduce need for in vitro fertilization raises ethical concerns. NPR. https://www.kcur.org/2020-01-16/embryo-research-to-reduce-need-for-in-vitro-fertilization-raises-ethical-concerns . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). ClinicalTrials.gov. Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and Human Uterine Lavage. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03426007 . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Previvo. [cited 2020 July 20]. https://www.previvo.com/ . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Ellot C, Lemmens T. Ethics for Sale. For-profit ethical review, coming to a clinical trial near you. Slate. 2005. https://slate.com/technology/2005/12/ethics-for-sale.html . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Evans D, Smith M, Willen L. Big pharma’s shameful secret. Bloomberg Markets. 2005;14:36–62.

Emanuel EJ, Lemmens T, Elliot C. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises? PLoS Med. 2006;3:e309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030309. PubMed DOI PMC

Human Reproduction. Journals policies and procedures. https://academic.oup.com/humrep/pages/Policies . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Papanikolaou EG, Tournaye H, Verpoest W, Camus M, Vernaeve V, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: early pregnancy outcome and profile. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:636–641. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh638. PubMed DOI

Sekhon L, Shaia K, Santistevan A, Cohn KH, Lee JA, Beim PY, Copperman AB. The cumulative dose of gonadotropins used for controlled ovarian stimulation does not influence the odds of embryonic aneuploidy in patients with normal ovarian response. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:749–758. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0909-3. PubMed DOI PMC

McCoy RC. Mosaicism in preimplantation human embryos: when chromosomal abnormalities are the norm. Trends Genet. 2017;33:448–463. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.04.001. PubMed DOI PMC

Kermi C, Aze A, Maiorano D. Preserving genome integrity during the early embryonic DNA replication cycles. Genes (Basel) 2019;10:398. doi: 10.3390/genes10050398. PubMed DOI PMC

Homer HA. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): the biology, the technology and the clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:317–324. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12960. PubMed DOI

Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. How PGS/PGT-A laboratories succeeded in losing all credibility. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;37:242–245. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.06.019. PubMed DOI

Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:454–466. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr003. PubMed DOI

Munné S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, Child T, Nakhuda G, Shamma FN, Silverberg K, Kalista T, Handyside AH, Katz-Jaffe M, Wells D, Gordon T, Stock-Myer S, Willman S. STAR Study Group. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:1071–1079.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346. PubMed DOI

Bolton H, Graham SJL, Van der Aa N, Kumar P, Theunis K, Fernandez Gallardo E, Voet T, Zernicka-Goetz M. Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11165. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11165. PubMed DOI PMC

Gleicher N, Metzger J, Croft G, Kushnir VA, Albertini DF, Barad DH. A single trophectoderm biopsy at blastocyst stage is mathematically unable to determine embryo ploidy accurately enough for clinical use. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15:33. doi: 10.1186/s12958-017-0251-8. PubMed DOI PMC

EggDonationFriends. IVF and Egg Donation Cost – Worldwide Guide. https://www.eggdonationfriends.com/egg-donation-guide/egg-donation-costs-worldwide-map/ . Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

Berntsen S, Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB, Laivuori H, Loft A, Oldereid NB, Romundstad LB, Bergh C, Pinborg A. The health of children conceived by ART: 'the chicken or the egg? Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:137–158. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz001. PubMed DOI

Zandstra H, Van Montfoort AP, Dumoulin JC. Does the type of culture medium used influence birthweight of children born after IVF? Hum Reprod. 2015;30:530–542. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu346. PubMed DOI

Goisis A, Remes H, Martikainen P, Klemetti R, Myrskylä M. Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. Lancet. 2019;393:1225–1232. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31863-4. PubMed DOI

Al-Jebari Y, Elenkov A, Wirestrand E, Schütz I, Giwercman A, Lundberg Giwercman Y. Risk of prostate cancer for men fathering through assisted reproduction: nationwide population based register study. BMJ. 2019;366:l5214. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5214. PubMed DOI PMC

Arellano M. The rise of stem cell therapies in Mexico: inadequate regulation or unsuccessful oversight. Revista Redbioética/UNESCO. 2012;3:63–78.

Reardon R. Mexico proposal to ban human-embryo research would stifle science. Nature. 2016;540:180–181. doi: 10.1038/540180a. DOI

World Medical Association (WMA). WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles For Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. July 2018. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ . Accessed 25 May 2020.

Grodin MA. Historical origins of the Nuremberg code. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code: human rights in human experimentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.

Military Government for Germany. United States of America vs. Karl Brandt, et al. (Case No. 1). (“The doctors trial”) https://legal-tools.org/doc/c18557 Accessed 25 May 2020.

Benedict S, Georges JM. Nurses and the sterilization experiments of Auschwitz: a postmodernist perspective. Nurs Inq. 2006;13:277–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2006.00330.x. PubMed DOI

World Health Organization: HANDBOOK FOR GOOD CLINICAL RESEARCH PRACTICE (GCP). 2002 https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_efficacy/gcp1.pdf Accessed 25 May 2020.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. THE BELMONT REPORT. 1979. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2020.