The paper deals with implementation of a smart learning environment, namely Blackboard, into the course of business communication. The new approach was implemented into the course and the research was conducted into the subjective satisfaction of the users of the environment. The first research was conducted in 2018 into the users´ satisfaction with the course which was taught using traditional methods, and the second research was conducted in 2019 into the users´ satisfaction with the new online course. The idea of the creator of the online course was to keep the contents and the scope of the subject as much similar as possible to create two groups of users, i.e. the first, using the traditional approaches, and the second with the modern technology-enabled class. With this intention, the Blackboard class was created, and the users were taught by using blended learning methodology. The research focused merely on personal satisfaction with the course within the intention of positive psychology, i.e. focusing on potential issues regarding personal satisfaction. It did not focus on the differences in the performance of the students as there is a lot of research into this aspect. However, it focused on the individual satisfaction and personal feelings of the users while using blended learning platforms in the context of ubiquitous computing. The findings are that the users expressed their satisfaction regarding easily accessible materials and varied learning environment; however, the dissatisfaction was created by increased screen time and reduces social contacts. The findings are very important for educators who use various mobile platforms and eLearning environments as they should be aware of the reservations of the users of these tools.

Faculty of Informatics and Management University of Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove 500 03 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Zhang D., Zhao J.L., Zhou L., Nunamaker J.F. Can E-Learning Replace Classroom Learning? Communications of the ACM. 2004;47(5):75–79. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/986213.986216, May 2004/, Online. DOI

Bates A.W. Technology, E-Learning and Distance Education. Routledge; London, New York: 2005.

Derouin R.E., Fritzsche B.A., Salas E. E-Learning in Organizations. Journal of Management. 2005;31(6):920–940. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279815. DOI

McEwen B.C. Web-assisted and Online Learning. Business Communication Quarterly. 2001;64(2):98–103. doi: 10.1177/108056990106400211. DOI

Steinweg S.B., Davis M.L., Thomson W.S. A Comparison of Traditional and Online Instruction in an Introduction to Special Education Course. Teacher Education and Special Education. 2005;28(1):62–73. doi: 10.1177/088840640502800107. DOI

Watson S., Sutton J.M. An Examination of the Effectiveness of Case Method Teaching Online: Does the Technology Matter? Journal of Management Education. 2012;36(6):802–821. doi: 10.1177/1052562912445281. DOI

Klímová B., Pikhart M. Cognitive and Applied Linguistics Aspects of Using Social Media: The Impact of the Use of Facebook on Developing Writing Skills in Learning English as a Foreign Language. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2020;10(1):110–118. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010010. PubMed DOI PMC

Kelly W.Q., Klein J.D. The Effect of Type of Podcasts and Learning Styles on Language Proficiency and Confidence. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2016;44(4):421–429. doi: 10.1177/0047239515617159. DOI

Bolliger D.U., Armier D.D. Active learning in the online environment: The integration of student-generated audio files. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2013;14(3):201–211. doi: 10.1177/1469787413498032. DOI

Hawks S.R., Judd H.A. Excellence in the Design and Delivery of an Online Global Health Survey Course: A Roadmap for Educators. Pedagogy in Health Promotion. 2020;6(1):70–76. doi: 10.1177/2373379919872781. DOI

O’Neal K., Jones W.P., Miller S.P., Campbell P., Pierce T. Comparing Web-based to Traditional Instruction for Teaching Special Education Content. Teacher Education and Special Education. 2007;30(1):34–41. doi: 10.1177/088840640703000104. DOI

Kontos G. Practical Teaching Aids for Online Classes. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2015;44(1):36–52. doi: 10.1177/0047239515598518. DOI

Young M.R. Integrating Quality Matters Into Hybrid Course Design: A Principles of Marketing Case Study. Journal of Marketing Education. 2014;36(3):233–243. doi: 10.1177/0273475314547821. DOI

Pikhart M. Interculturality in blended learning: challenges of electronic communication. In: Uskov V.L., editor. Vol. 144. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.; 2019. pp. 97–106. (Smart Education and e-Learning 2019. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies). ISBN 978-981-13-8259-8.

Pikhart, M. (2019) Intercultural Business Communication Courses in European Universities as A Way to Enhance Competitiveness, Proceedings of the 32nd International Business Information Management Association Conference p. 524-527. 15-16 November 2018 Seville, Spain. Ed. Khalid S. Soliman. International Business Information Management Association. ISBN: 978-0-9998551-1-9

Pikhart, M. (2018) Technology Enhanced Learning Experience in Intercultural Business Communication Course: A Case Study. In Emerging Technologies for Education. Third International Symposium, SETE 2018, Held in Conjunction with ICWL 2018, Chiang Mai, Thailand, August 22-24, 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Editors: Tianyong Hao, Wei Chen, Ha, Publisher: Springer International Publishing,Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03579-2,Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-03580-8.

Kenzig M.J. Lost in Translation: Adapting a Face-to-Face Course Into an Online Learning Experience. Health Promotion Practice. 2015;16(5):625–628. doi: 10.1177/1524839915588295. PubMed DOI

Walker K. Applying Distributed Learning Theory in Online Business Communication Courses. Business Communication Quarterly. 2003;66(2):55–67. doi: 10.1177/108056990306600205. DOI

Journell W. Walk, Don’t Run - to Online Learning. Phi Delta Kappan. 2012;93(7):46–50. doi: 10.1177/003172171209300711. DOI

Abd-Hamid N.H., Walkner L. Evidence-Based Best Practices in Designing and Developing Quality eLearning for the Public Health and Health Care Workforce. Pedagogy in Health Promotion. 2017;3(1_suppl):35S–39S. doi: 10.1177/2373379917692818. DOI

Larbi-Apau J.A., Guerra-Lopez I., Moseley J.L., Spannaus T., Yaprak A. Educational Technology-Related Performance of Teaching Faculty in Higher Education: Implications for eLearning Management. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2017;46(1):61–79. doi: 10.1177/0047239516685849. DOI

Guidera S.G. Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Online Instruction in Terms of the Seven Principles of Effective Undergraduate Education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2003;32(2-3):139–178. doi: 10.2190/K148-9EDA-B842-U3PA. DOI

House-Peters L.A., Del Casino V.J., Brooks C.F. Dialogue, inquiry, and encounter: Critical geographies of online higher education. Progress in Human Geography. 2019;43(1):81–103. doi: 10.1177/0309132517735705. DOI

Blackburn G. Effectiveness of eLearning in statistics: Pictures and stories. E-Learning and Digital Media. 2015;12(5-6):459–480. doi: 10.1177/2042753016653704. DOI

Ditter U., editor. Walter de Gruyter; Berlin: 2017. (E-Learning 4.0).

Chambers J.C., Richardson F.C., Slife B.D. Thinking through Positive Psychology. Theory & Psychology. 2008;18(5):555–561.

Jeyaraj J.J., Harland T. Transforming Teaching and Learning in ELT Through Critical Pedagogy: An International Study. Journal of Transformative Education. 2014;12(4):343–355. doi: 10.1177/1541344614550042. DOI

Gable S.L., Haidt J. What (and Why) is Positive Psychology? Review of General Psychology. 2005;9(2):103–110. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103. DOI

Seligman M.E.P. Positive Social Science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 1999;1(3):181–182. doi: 10.1177/109830079900100306. DOI

Pikhart M., Klímová B. Utilization of Linguistic Aspects of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Blended Learning. Education Sciences. 2019;9(3):235. doi: 10.3390/educsci9030235ISSN2227-7102. DOI

Klímová B., Pikhart M. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer; Cham: 2019. Blended Learning Approach in English Language Teaching - Its Benefits, Challenges, and Perspectives; pp. 229–293. DOI

Klímová, B., Pikhart, M. (2019) Mobile Applications and their Role in Teaching English - Methodological Basis. ICERI2019 Proceedings. 2th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation 11-13 November, 2019, Seville, Spain. pp. 986-990. ISBN: 978-84-09-14755-7. ISSN: 2340-1095. doi: 10.21125/iceri.2019.0306

Pikhart, M., Klímová, B. (2019) Digital transformation of intercultural communication. ICERI2019 Proceedings 2th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation 11-13 November, 2019, Seville, Spain, pp. 991-994. ISBN: 978-84-09-14755-7. ISSN: 2340-1095. doi: 10.21125/iceri.2019.0308

Pikhart M. Aspects of Intercultural Communication in IT: Convergence of Communication and Computing in the Global World of Interconnectedness. In: Park J.J., editor. Lnee 590. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.; 2020. pp. 251–256. DOI

Pikhart, M.; Klímová, B. eLearning 4.0 as a Sustainability Strategy for Generation Z Language Learners: Applied Linguistics of Second Language Acquisition in Younger Adults. Societies 2020, 10, 38.

Klimova B. Mobile learning and its impact on learning English vocabulary. In: Park J., Yang L., Jeong Y.S., Hao F., editors. Vol. 590. Springer; Singapore: 2020. pp. 271–276. (Advanced Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering. MUE 2019, FutureTech 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering). ISBN 978-981-32-9243-7.

Klimova B. Impact of Mobile Learning on Students’. Achievement Results. Educ. Sci. 2019;9(2):90. doi: 10.3390/educsci9020090. DOI

Kacetl J., Klímová B. Use of smartphone applications in English language learning - A challenge for foreign language education. Educ. Sci. 2019;9:179. doi: 10.3390/educsci9030179. DOI

Poláková P., Klímová B. Mobile technology and generation Z in the English language classroom - A preliminary study. Educ. Sci. 2019;9(3):203. doi: 10.3390/educsci9030203. DOI