A Randomized Trial Comparing Short versus Prolonged Hemostasis with Rescue Recanalization by Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression: Impact on Radial Artery Occlusion-The RESCUE-RAO Trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie
PubMed
33149729
PubMed Central
PMC7603610
DOI
10.1155/2020/7928961
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- arteria radialis * diagnostické zobrazování patologie chirurgie MeSH
- arteria ulnaris fyziologie MeSH
- arteriální okluzní nemoci * diagnóza etiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- duplexní dopplerovská ultrasonografie metody MeSH
- hemostatické techniky * normy statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče MeSH
- koronární angioplastika * škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- periferní katetrizace * škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- pletysmografie metody MeSH
- průchodnost cév MeSH
- trvání terapie * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Despite the enormous benefits of radial access, this route is associated with a risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). OBJECTIVE: We compared the incidence of RAO in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography and intervention after short versus prolonged hemostasis protocol. Also we assessed the efficacy of rescue 1-hour ipsilateral ulnar artery compression if RAO was observed after hemostasis. Material and Methods. Patients referred for elective transradial coronary procedures were eligible. After 6 F radial sheath removal, patients were randomized to short (3 hours) (n = 495) or prolonged (8 hours) (n = 503) hemostasis and a simple bandage was placed over the puncture site. After hemostasis was completed, oximetry plethysmography was used to assess the patency of the radial artery. RESULTS: One thousand patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups with average age 61.4 ± 9.4 years (71% male) and PCI performed on half of the patients. The RAO rate immediately after hemostasis was 3.2% in the short hemostasis group and 10.1% in the prolonged group (p < 0.001). Rescue recanalization was successful only in the short group in 56.2% (11/19); at hospital discharge, RAO rates were 1.4% in the short group and 10.1% in the prolonged group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Shorter hemostasis was associated with significantly less RAO compared to prolonged hemostasis. Rescue radial artery recanalization was effective in > 50%, but only in the short hemostasis group.
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik 2 Universitätsklinikum Bonn Bonn Germany
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology Ministry of Health of Russia Moscow Russia
Quebec Heart Lung Institute Quebec Canada
University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen Pilsen Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Chase A. J., Fretz E. B., Warburton W. P., et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg) Heart. 2008;94(8):1019–1025. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.136390. PubMed DOI
Kugelmass A. D., Cohen D. J., Brown P. P., Simon A. W., Becker E. R., Culler S. D. Hospital resources consumed in treating complications associated with percutaneous coronary interventions. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2006;97(3):322–327. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.047. PubMed DOI
Ferrante G., Rao S. V., Jüni P., et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016;9(14):1419–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.014. PubMed DOI
Rathore S., Stables R. H., Pauriah M., et al. A randomized comparison of TR band and radistop hemostatic compression devices after transradial coronary intervention. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2010;76(5):660–667. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22615. PubMed DOI
Plante S., Cantor W. J., Goldman L., et al. Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2010;76(5):654–658. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22610. PubMed DOI
Hahalis G., Aznaouridis K., Tsigkas G., et al. Radial artery and ulnar artery occlusions following coronary procedures and the impact of anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (radial and ulnar ARTE ry occlusion Meta-analys IS ) systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017;6(8) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005430.e005430 PubMed DOI PMC
Bertrand O. F., Rao S. V., Pancholy S., et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2010;3(10):1022–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.013. PubMed DOI
Ognerubov D. V., Provatorov S. I., Tereshchenko A. S., et al. Rate of complications at early removal of compression bandage after transradial coronary angiography. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(1):79–83. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2019.1.10218. PubMed DOI
Uhlemann M., Gielen S., Linke A., et al. The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization. European Heart Journal. 2012;32:p. 955. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.011. PubMed DOI
Chim H., Bakri K., Moran S. L. Complications related to radial artery occlusion, radial artery harvest, and arterial lines. Hand Clinics. 2015;31(1):93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2014.09.010. PubMed DOI
Aykan A. Ç., Gökdeniz T., Gül I., et al. Comparison of low dose versus standard dose heparin for radial approach in elective coronary angiography? International Journal of Cardiology. 2015;187:389–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.314. PubMed DOI
Dangoisse V., Guédès A., Chenu P., et al. Usefulness of a gentle and short hemostasis using the transradial band device after transradial access for percutaneous coronary angiography and interventions to reduce the radial artery occlusion rate (from the Prospective and Randomized CRASOC I, II, and III Studies) The American Journal of Cardiology. 2017;120(3):374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.037. PubMed DOI
Barbeau G. R., Arsenault F., Dugas L., Simard S., Larivière M. M. Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allen’s test in 1010 patients. American Heart Journal. 2004;147(3):489–493. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.038. PubMed DOI
Bertrand O. F. Acute forearm muscle swelling post transradial catheterization and compartment syndrome: prevention is better than treatment! Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2010;75(3):366–368. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22448. PubMed DOI
Pancholy S., Coppola J., Patel T., Roke-Thomas M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2008;72(3):335–340. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21639. PubMed DOI
Rashid M., Kwok C. S., Pancholy S, et al. Radial artery occlusion after transradial interventions: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016;5(1) doi: 10.1161/jaha.115.002686.e002686 PubMed DOI PMC
Pancholy S. B., Bernat I., Bertrand O. F., Patel T. M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016;9(19):1992–1999. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020. PubMed DOI
Dharma S., Kedev S., Patel T., Rao S. V., Gilchrist I. C. Different spasmolytic regimens (nitroglycerin vs verapamil) and the incidence of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2018 Dec;30(12):461–464. PubMed
Pocock S. J. Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 1983.
Aminian A., Saito S., Takahashi A., et al. Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients: a substudy from RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse lini) randomized multicenter trial. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2018;92:1–8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27526. PubMed DOI PMC
Bi X.-L., Fu X.-H., Gu X.-S., et al. Influence of puncture site on radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervention. Chinese Medical Journal. 2016;129(8):898–902. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.179795. PubMed DOI PMC
Tian J., Chu Y.-S., Sun J., Jiang T.-M. Ulnar artery compression. Chinese Medical Journal. 2015;128(6):795–798. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.152639. PubMed DOI PMC
Nagai S., Abe S., Sato T., et al. Ultrasonic assessment of vascular complications in coronary angiography and angioplasty after transradial approach. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1999;83(2):180–186. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00821-2. PubMed DOI
Zankl A. R., Andrassy M., Volz C., et al. Radial artery thrombosis following transradial coronary angiography: incidence and rationale for treatment of symptomatic patients with low-molecular-weight heparins. Clinical Research in Cardiology. 2010;99(12):841–847. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0197-8. PubMed DOI
Hirsh J., Raschke R. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin. Chest. 2004;126(3):188S–203S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.188s. PubMed DOI
Koutouzis M. J., Maniotis C. D., Avdikos G., Tsoumeleas A., Andreou C., Kyriakides Z. S. ULnar artery Transient compression facilitating Radial Artery patent hemostasis (ULTRA): a novel technique to reduce radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2016;28:451–454. PubMed
Bernat I., Bertrand O. F., Rokyta R., et al. Efficacy and safety of transient ulnar artery compression to recanalize acute radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2011;107(11):1698–1701. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.056. PubMed DOI
Pancholy S. B. Transradial access in an occluded radial artery: new technique. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2007;19:541–544. PubMed
Bernat I., Aminian A. Pancholy S., et al. “Best practices for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial diagnostic angiography and intervention. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2019;12(22):2235–2246. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.043. PubMed DOI