PURPOSE: To compare bony nasolacrimal duct anatomy between ethnic groups. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patients of four ethnic groups who had high-resolution CTs between 2004 and 2019 covering the full length of their nasolacrimal ducts in two hospitals in Essex, England. Only normal ducts were included; patients with tearing or radiological abnormalities were excluded. Measurements were taken of the nasolacrimal duct and surrounding anatomy based on measurements found in the existing literature. RESULTS: More females (n = 114) than males (n = 40) were included. South Asian (Indian subcontinent), Afro-Caribbean and European groups were equivocal demographically (n = 25-29, mean age 40-45); however, the Oriental group was fewer in number (n = 13) and slightly older (mean age 51). South Asian and European ducts had no significant differences. Afro-Caribbean ducts were wider and shorter than European. Afro-Caribbean faces are wider and their noses flatter and wider than European. Oriental ducts were wider and longer than European, but Europeans have taller noses. CONCLUSION: The results from our Oriental group fits with the published data in Orientals. The bony nasolacrimal duct is greater in calibre (inner diameter) if the patient is of Afro-Caribbean or Oriental origin compared to European or South Asian. Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Afro-Caribbean or Oriental patients may be more likely due to secondary causes.

East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust Colchester UK

Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Southend on Sea UK

See more in PubMed

2011 census: ethnic group, local authorities in England and Wales. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/2011censuskeystatisticsforlocalauthoritiesinenglandandwales . Accessed February 22, 2020

Ali MJ, Paulsen F (2019) Etiopathogenesis of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: what we know and what we need to know. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 35:426–433. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000001310 PubMed DOI

Bulbul E, Yazici A, Yanik B, Yazici H, Demirpolat G (2016) Morphometric evaluation of bony nasolacrimal canal in a caucasian population with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a multidetector computed tomography study. Korean J Radiol 17:271–276. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.2.271 PubMed DOI PMC

Estes JL, Tsiouris AJ, Christos PJ, Lelli GJ (2015) Three-dimensional volumetric assessment of the nasolacrimal duct in patients with obstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 31:211–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000259 PubMed DOI PMC

Fasina O, Ogbole GI (2013) CT assessment of the nasolacrimal canal in a black African population. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 29:231–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e3182873d2e PubMed DOI

Gore SK, Naveed H, Hamilton J, Rene C, Rose GE, Davagnanam I (2015) Radiological comparison of the lacrimal sac fossa anatomy between black Africans and Caucasians. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 31:328–331. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000457 PubMed DOI

Groell R, Schaffler GJ, Uggowitzer M, Szolar DH, Muellner K (1997) CT-anatomy of the nasolacrimal sac and duct. Surg Radiol Anat 19:189–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01627974 PubMed DOI

Groessl SA, Sires BS, Lemke BN (1997) An anatomical basis for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago III 1960) 115:71–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150073012 DOI

Janssen AG, Mansour K, Bos JJ, Castelijns JA (2001) Diameter of the bony lacrimal canal: normal values and values related to nasolacrimal duct obstruction: assessment with CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:845–850 PubMed

Kang D, Park J, Na J, Lee H, Baek S (2017) Measurement of lacrimal sac fossa using orbital computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg 28:125–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003262 PubMed DOI

Lee H, Ha S, Lee Y, Park M, Baek S (2012) Anatomical and morphometric study of the bony nasolacrimal canal using computed tomography. Ophthalmologica 227:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1159/000331986 PubMed DOI

Lin Z, Kamath N, Malik A (2020) High-resolution computed tomography assessment of bony nasolacrimal parameters: variations due to age, sex, and facial features. Orbit. https://doi.org/10.1080/016768301793374 PubMed DOI

Linberg JV, McCormick SA (1986) Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 93:1055–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33620-0 PubMed DOI

McCormick A, Sloan B (2009) The diameter of the nasolacrimal canal measured by computed tomography: gender and racial differences. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37:357–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02042.x PubMed DOI

Park JH, Huh JA, Piao JF, Lee H, Baek SH (2019) Measuring nasolacrimal duct volume using computed tomography images in nasolacrimal duct obstruction patients in Korean. Int J Ophthalmol 12:100–105. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.01.16 PubMed DOI PMC

Paulsen FP, Thale AB, Maune S, Tillmann BN (2001) New insights into the pathophysiology of primary acquired dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology 108:2329–2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00946-0 PubMed DOI

Post RH (1969) Tear duct size differences of age, sex and race. Am J Phys Anthropol 30:85–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330300109 PubMed DOI

Ramey NA, Hoang JK, Richard MJ (2013) Multidetector CT of nasolacrimal canal morphology: normal variation by age, gender, and race. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 29:475–480. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e3182a230b0 PubMed DOI

Samarei R, Samarei V, Aidenloo NS, Fateh N (2020) Sinonasal anatomical variations and primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a single centre, case−control investigation. Eurasian J Med 52:21–24. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2019.19034 PubMed DOI PMC

Shigeta K, Takegoshi H, Kikuchi S (2007) Sex and age differences in the bony nasolacrimal canal: an anatomical study. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago III 1960) 125:1677–1681. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.12.1677 DOI

Sibley D, Norris JH, Malhotra R (2013) Management and outcomes of patients with epiphora referred to a specialist ophthalmic plastic unit. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 41:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02866.x PubMed DOI

Takahashi Y, Nakata K, Miyazaki H, Ichinose A, Kakizaki H (2014) Comparison of bony nasolacrimal canal narrowing with or without primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a Japanese population. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 30:434–438. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000238 PubMed DOI

Wilhelm KE, Rudorf H, Greschus S, Garbe S, Lussem M, Lischka T, Schild HH, Gerstner AO (2009) Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dacryocystography for imaging of the nasolacrimal duct system. Klin Neuroradiol 19:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-009-9025-9 PubMed DOI

Woo KI, Maeng HS, Kim YD (2011) Characteristics of intranasal structures for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in asians. Am J Ophthalmol 152(491–498):e491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.02.019 DOI

Yazici H, Bulbul E, Yazici A, Kaymakci M, Tiskaoglu N, Yanik B, Ermis S (2015) Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: is it really related to paranasal abnormalities? Surg Radiol Anat 37:579–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1391-6 PubMed DOI

Yong AM, Zhao DB, Siew SC, Goh PS, Liao J, Amrith S (2014) Assessment of bony nasolacrimal parameters among Asians. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 30:322–327. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000101 PubMed DOI